Haze in the digital library: design issues hampering accessibility for blind users
Citations
25 citations
15 citations
Cites background from "Haze in the digital library: design..."
...Xie and Babu (2015) and Babu and Xie (2017) provide concrete ideas about how to enhance metadata for digitized and borndigital objects to enhance their accessibility....
[...]
...While there remains a heavy focus on library websites in the accessibility literature, other types of online resources have come into question as well, including research databases (Blechner, 2015); online exhibits and collections of digitized and born-digital materials (Walker and Keenan, 2015; Xie and Babu, 2015; Sorrell et al., 2017; Babu and Xie, 2017); instructional objects (Oud, 2011; Wakimoto and Soules, 2011; Wray, 2013; Clossen, 2014; Clossen and Proces, 2017); archival finding aids (Southwell and Slater, 2012 and 2013); e-books and ereaders (Maatta and Bonnici, 2014; Mune and Agee, 2016; Dobson and McNaught, 2017; Kahler 2017; McNaught et al....
[...]
...…2015); online exhibits and collections of digitized and born-digital materials (Walker and Keenan, 2015; Xie and Babu, 2015; Sorrell et al., 2017; Babu and Xie, 2017); instructional objects (Oud, 2011; Wakimoto and Soules, 2011; Wray, 2013; Clossen, 2014; Clossen and Proces, 2017); archival…...
[...]
11 citations
Cites background from "Haze in the digital library: design..."
...…within a DL. Existing DLs are sight-centered by design and characterized by complex structures, heterogeneous content formats, and layered system dimensions, which run counter to the nonvisual, linear interaction approach of blind DL users (Babu & Xie, 2017; Xie, Babu, Lee, Castillo, et al., 2020)....
[...]
4 citations
Cites background from "Haze in the digital library: design..."
...Babu and Xie [7] recommend that academic libraries be innovative to help disabled patrons meet their information needs, whereas practitioners ask academic libraries to adopt combinations of new ideas, processes, teams, and work practices...
[...]
..., JAWS), can help visually impaired students read PDF documents [7]....
[...]
...Babu R and Xie I. Haze in the digital library: Design issues hampering accessibility for blind users....
[...]
...Babu and Xie [7] recommend that academic libraries be innovative to help disabled patrons meet their information needs, whereas practitioners ask academic libraries to adopt combinations of new ideas, processes, teams, and work practices [19] to improve information services....
[...]
...Xie I, Babu R, Joo S, Fuller P....
[...]
3 citations
References
18,082 citations
5,864 citations
300 citations
"Haze in the digital library: design..." refers background in this paper
...Lazar et al. (2007) identified six design problems that can frustrate blindWeb users: (1) complex page layout generating erratic SR feedback; (2) SR-incompatible Web applications; (3) unlabelled and unorganized forms; (4) visual items without alternative text descriptions; (5) misleading links; and…...
[...]
154 citations
"Haze in the digital library: design..." refers methods in this paper
...Bigham et al. (2007) described dynamic technologies including AJAX, JavaScript and Flash as problematic....
[...]
94 citations
"Haze in the digital library: design..." refers background in this paper
...Numerous other commands are available for a multitude of operations, but blind users typically use just a handful of them (Leuthold et al., 2008)....
[...]
...…(3) unlabelled and unorganized forms; (4) visual items without alternative text descriptions; (5) misleading links; and (6) inaccessible PDFs. Leuthold et al. (2008) pointed out four issues that hamperWeb navigation: (1) visual orientation of navigation elements; (2) navigation and…...
[...]
...Accessibility problems of digital resources It is widely believed that the Web is sight-centred by design and, thereby, it presents significant problems for blind users (Babu, 2013; Leuthold et al., 2008)....
[...]
...Lazar et al. (2007) identified six design problems that can frustrate blindWeb users: (1) complex page layout generating erratic SR feedback; (2) SR-incompatible Web applications; (3) unlabelled and unorganized forms; (4) visual items without alternative text descriptions; (5) misleading links; and (6) inaccessible PDFs. Leuthold et al. (2008) pointed out four issues that hamperWeb navigation: (1) visual orientation of navigation elements; (2) navigation and interpretation cues conveyed via colour, graphic or video; (3) navigation options repeated across pages; and (4) multiplicity of navigation options....
[...]