scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy

17 Jun 2016-Journal of The Philosophy of History (Brill)-Vol. 10, Iss: 2, pp 211-234
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein, and consider some of the debates generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock.
Abstract: This article has three main interconnected aims. First, I illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein. Second, I consider some of the historiographical debates that have been generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock, in particular. Third, I discuss Arthur Danto’s Analytic Philosophy of History, published 50 years ago, and argue for a reinvigorated analytic philosophy of history.

Summary (1 min read)

Jump to: [Introduction][Author Contributions] and [Notes]

Introduction

  • This document is confidential and is proprietary to the American Chemical Society and its authors.
  • Do not copy or disclose without written permission.
  • If you have received this item in error, notify the sender and delete all copies.

Author Contributions

  • The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.
  • All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Notes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interest.
  • Irma Flores would like to acknowledge CONACYT for the Ph.D. grant awarded.
  • 3D image of Candida antarctica Lipase B (CALB) was taken from Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 4K6G).
  • Authors are also thankful to Novozymes for providing the Novozym 435 sample used throughout in this work.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

King’s Research Portal
DOI:
10.1163/18722636-12341321
Document Version
Peer reviewed version
Link to publication record in King's Research Portal
Citation for published version (APA):
Beaney, M. A. (2016). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy.
Journal of the Philosophy of History. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341321
Citing this paper
Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may
differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination,
volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are
again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright
owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
•Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.
•You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
•You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact librarypure@kcl.ac.uk providing details, and we will remove access to
the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Download date: 09. Aug. 2022

! "#!!"#$%&'(")(*+,(- + .'"/"0 +1 (")(2 ./*" $1!$%&'()*!+,"!'&-''(./'01 % % ( .(2'%.3'.%'!
!
456!78#9:!;<=:8>9?8@#!8A!9B98:9=:6!9?*!CCC-=D8::->@E/F@<D#9:2;58:@A@;5G258A?@DG!
Historiography,-Philosophy-of-Histor y -
and-the-Historical-Turn-in-Analytic-Philosophy-
Michael-Beaney-
!
Abstract-
458A!9D?8>:6!59A!?5D66!E98#!8#?6D>@##6>?6H!98EA-!I8DA?J!"!8::<A?D9?6!?56!58A?@D8@KD9;58>9:!
>@#>6;?8@#A! @7! ?5D66! 69D:G! 9#9:G?8>! ;58:@A@;56DA*! ID6K6J! L<AA6::! 9#H! M8??K6#A?68#-!
N6>@#HJ!"!>@#A8H6D!A@E6!@7!?56!58A?@D8@KD9;58>9:!H6=9?6A!?59?!59B6!=66#!K6#6D9?6H!=G!
?56!D6>6#?!58A?@D8>9:!?<D# !8#!9# 9:G?8>!; 58:@A@ ;5G J!:@@O8# K!9?!?56 !C@ DO!@ 7!N>@??!N@ 9E 6 A!9#H !
P9#A2Q@59##!R:@>OJ!8#!; 9 D?8> < :9D -!458DHJ!"!H8A> < AA!SD?5<D !+9#?@TA!3%&'1*.4(-+.'"/"0+1(")(
2./*"$1J! ;<=:8 A56H! U & ! G69DA! 9K@J! 9 # H ! 9DK<6 ! 7 @ D ! 9 ! D68#B8K @ D 9 ? 6 H ! 9 #9:G?8> ! ;58:@A @ ; 5G! @7!
58A?@DG-!
!
!
Keywords-
58A?@D8@KD9;5G! @7! 9#9:G?8>! ;58:@A@;5GJ! 58A?@D8>9:! ?<D#! 8#! 9#9:G?8>! ;58:@A@;5GJ! 9#9:G?8>!
;58:@A@;5G!@7!58A?@DGJ!ID6K6J!L<AA6::J!M8??K6#A?68#J!+9#?@!
!
!
Contents-
'! "#?D@H<>?8@# !
%!! ID6K6!9#H!?56!D@:6!@7!58A?@D8>9:!6:<>8H9?8@#!
.! L<AA6::!9#H!?56!<A6!@7!D9?8@#9:!D6>@#A?D<>?8@#!
3! M8??K6#A?68#!9#H!?56!>D8?8V<6!@7!:9#K<9K6!
U! 456!58A?@D8>9:!?<D#!8#!9#9:G?8> !; 5 8:@ A@ ; 5 G!
(! P8A?@D8@KD9;58>9:!H6=9?6A!8#!58A?@DG!@7!9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5G!
1! I@DEA!@7!58A?@D8>8AE!
0! +9#?@!9#H!9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5G!@7!58A?@DG!
W! S;;:G8#K!+9#?@TA!8H69A!
'&! X@#>:<A8@#*!D68#B8K@D9 ?8# K !9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5G!@7!58A?@DG!
!
!
1-Introduction-
S#9:G?8>! ;58:@A@;5G! 8A! C8H6:G! D6K9DH6H! 9A! 958A?@D8>8A?! 8#! E6?5@H@:@KGJ! 9#H!
8#H66HJ! 6B6#! 9A! 9#?8258A?@D8>8A?-! X6D?98#:GJ! 87! C6! >@#A8H6D! ?56! @778>89:!
;D@#@<#>6E6#?A!@7!A@E6!@7!?56!:69H8#K!78K<D6A!@7!9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5GJ!6A;6>89::G!
8#! 8?A! 69D:G! ;59A6J! ?56#! @#6! >9#! 69A8:G! >@E6! 9C9G! C8?5! ?56! 8E;D6AA8@#! ?59?!
Y58A?@D8>9:T!<#H6DA?9#H8#K!9#H!9;;D@9>56A!9D6!H66E6H!@7!:8E8?6H!A8K#878>9#>6!8#!
;58:@A@;5G-! Z6?! 6B6#!?56!E@A?! A<;;@A6H:G! 958A?@D8>8A?! @7! 9#9:G?8>! ;58:@A@;56DA!
E9O6!<A6!@7!58A?@DG!@7!;58:@A@;5G!8#!?568D!C@DOJ!9#H!?56!V<6A?8@#!8A!#@?!A@!E<>5!

! 2./*"$."5$&0+16(-+.'"/"0+1(") (2 . /* " $ 1(&%7(*+,(2./*"$.4&'(8#$%(.%(3%&'1*.4(-+.'"/"0+1! %!
456!78#9:!;<=:8>9?8@#!8A!9B98:9=:6!9?*!CCC-=D8::->@E/F@<D#9:2;58:@A@;5G258A?@DG!
C5G!?56G!H@!#@?!<A6!58A?@DG!@7!;58:@A@;5G!9A!D9?56D!5@C!9#H!C5G!?56G!<A6!8?!9A!
?56G!H@-
'
!P8A?@D8@KD9;58>9:!>@#>6;?8@#A!9#H!E6?5@HA![!5@C6B6D!>D<H6!?56G!E9G!
=6![!9D6!#@?!9=A6#?!8#!9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5GJ!8#!@?56D!C@DHAJ!=<?!9D6!;D6A<;;@A6H!
9#H!@;6D9?6!8E;:8>8?:G!8#!B9D8@<A!C9GA-!456!78DA?!98E!@7!?58A!;9;6D!8A!?@!8::<A?D9?6!
?58A!=G!:@@O8#K!=D867:G!9?!?56!E6?5@H@:@K86A!@7!?5D66!@7!?56!7@<#H6DA!@7!9#9:G?8>!
;58:@A@;5G*!ID6K6!$\%)J!L<AA6::!$\.)J!9#H!M8??K6#A?68#!$\3)-!
! N8#>6! ?56! 69D:G! 'WW&A! ?56D6! 59A! =66#! 9! E@B6E6#?! C8?58#! 9#9:G?8>!
;58:@A@;5G!?@!?9O6!58A?@DG!@7!;58:@A@;5G!E@D6!A6D8@<A:GJ!9#H!6A;6>89::G!8?A!@C#!
58A?@DG-! 456! D69A@#A! 7@D! ?58A! 9D6! >@E;:6]J! =<?! @#6! E98#! D69A@#! 59A! =66#! ?56!
KD@C8#K! A6#A6! @7! ?56! H8A?9#>6! =6?C66#! ?56! >@#>6D#A! 9#H! ;D@F6>?A! @7! 9#9:G?8>!
;58:@A@;56DA!?@H9G!9#H!?5@A6!@7!8?A!7@<#H6DA!#@C!E@D6!?59#!9!>6#?<DG!9K@-!"!A9G!
A@E6?58#K!9=@<?!?56!58A?@D8>9:!?<D#!?59?!59A!?9O6#!;:9>6!8#!9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5G!
$\U)J! =67@D6! :@@O8#K! 9?! A@E6! @7! ?56! H6=9?6A! 8?! 59A! K6#6D9?6H! 9=@<?! ?56!
D6:9?8@#A58;!=6?C66#!;58:@A@;5G!9#H!58A?@DG!@7!;58:@A@;5G-!"#!;9D?8><:9DJ!"!?9O6!
?56!6]9E;:6!@7! N>@??! N@9E6AT!%&&.! C@DO!@#! ?56! 58A?@DG!@7!9#9:G?8>! ;58:@A@;5G!
$\()!9#H!H8A><AA!P9#A2Q@59##!R:@>OTA!9>>@<#?!@7!7@DEA!@7!58A?@D8>8AE!$\1)-!458AJ!
?56#J!8A!?56!A6>@#H!98E!@7!?58A!;9;6D*!?@!6:<>8H9?6!?56!58A?@D8>9:!?<D#!8#!9#9:G?8>!
;58:@A@;5G!9#H!>@#A8H6D!A@E6!@7!?56!H6=9?6A!?59?!?58A!59A!8#A;8D6H-!
! "#!?56!78#9:!;9D?!@7!?56!;9;6D!"!?<D#!?@!SD?5<D!+9#?@TA!3%&'1*.4(-+.'"/"0+1(
")(2./*"$1J!C58>5!C9A!;<=:8A56H!8#!'W(U-!"!@<?:8#6!8?A!E98#!8H69A!$\0)!9#H!A5@C!
5@C!?56G!>9#!=6!9;;:86H!?@!?56!;@8#?A!E9H6!69D:86D!8#!?56!;9;6D!$\W)-!"!>@#>:<H6!
C8?5! 9! ;:69! 7@D! 9! D68#B8K@D9?6H! 9#9:G?8>! ;58:@A@;5G! @7! 58A?@DG! $\'&)-! 456! ?58DH!
98E! @7! ?56! ;9;6DJ! ?56#J! 8A! ?@! D6B8A8?! +9#?@TA! C@DO! 9#H! =D8#K! 8?! =9>O! 8#?@! ?56!
H6=9?6A! 9=@<?! 58A?@D8@KD9;5G! 8#A;8D6H! =G! ?56! 58A?@D8>9:! ?<D#! 8#! 9#9:G?8>!
;58:@A@;5G-!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
The term ‘history’ is used in three main senses. It can mean a (relevant) series of past events, a
(relevant) account of such a series, or the discipline of writing such accounts. Context usually makes
clear which sense is intended. Generally, though, I shall use it in the first sense with the definite article,
as in speaking of ‘the history of philosophy’ to denote philosophy’s actual past, in the second sense
with either the indefinite or no article, as in speaking of ‘writing a history of philosophy’, and in the
third sense with no article, as in speaking of ‘doing history of philosophy’. Sometimes both the second
and third senses may be involved, as in speaking of ‘using history of philosophy’, but no confusion
need result. Where unclarity might arise, I shall add an appropriate qualification in parentheses.

! 2./*"$."5$&0+16(-+.'"/"0+1(") (2 . /* " $ 1(&%7(*+,(2./*"$.4&'(8#$%(.%(3%&'1*.4(-+.'"/"0+1! .!
456!78#9:!;<=:8>9?8@#!8A!9B98:9=:6!9?*!CCC-=D8::->@E/F@<D#9:2;58:@A@;5G258A?@DG!
2-Frege-and-the-role-of-historical-elucidation-
R@??:@=!ID6K6!$'030['W%U)!8A!#@C!K6#6D9::G!D6>@K#8^6H!9A!@#6!@7!?56!7@<#H6DA!@7!
9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5G-!P8A!E98#!;D@F6>?!C9A!?@!H6E@#A?D9?6!?56!:@K8>8A?!?56A8A!?59?!
9D8?5E6?8>! >@<:H! =6! D6H<>6H! ?@! :@K8>J! 9#H! ?58A! D6V<8D6H! ?56! H6B6:@;E6#?! @7!
:@K8>9:! ?56@DG! 7@D! C58>5! ID6K6! 8A! D8K5?:G! 9>>@DH6H! 58A! ;:9>6! 8#! ?56! 58A?@DG! @7!
9#9:G?8>!;58:@A@;5G-!456!#6C!:@K8>9:!?56@DG!C9 A!8#?D@H<>6H!8#!ID6K6TA!78DA?!=@@OJ!
9,5$.))//4+$.)*J!;<=:8A56H!8#!'01W-!"?!D6>68B6H!;@@D!D6B86CAJ!5@C6B6DJ!9#H!ID6K6!
C9A!6#>@<D9K6H! ?@!;D6A6#?! 58A!8H69A! 8#7@DE9::G!=67@D6! A66O8#K!?@! H6E@#A?D9?6!
?56! :@K8>8A?! ?56A8A! 7@DE9::G-! 456! D6A<:?! C9A! 8+,( :"#%7&*."%/( ")( 3$.*+;,*.4J! 58A!
A6>@#H!=@@OJ!C58>5!9;;69D6H!8#!'003-!M59?!8A!A8K#878>9#?!9=@<?!?58A!=@@O!8A!?59?!
?56! 78DA?! 59:7! 8A! H6B@?6H! ?@! 9#! 6]9E8#9?8@#! 9#H! >D8?8V<6! @7! ;D6B8@<A! B86CA! @7!
#<E=6D!8#!?56!58A?@DG!@7!E9?56E9?8>A!9#H!;58:@A@;5G![!9E@#K!@?56DAJ!?5@A6!@7!
_<>:8HJ! `9#?J! a68=#8^J! b8::J! c6C?@#J! N>5DdH6DJ! a@>O6J! e6DO6:6GJ! P@==6AJ! P<E6J!
9#H!+6A>9D?6A-!ID6K6!E9G!59B6!<A6H!9!>@::6>?8@#!9A!58A!A@<D>6!7@D!?56!C@DOA!56!
>8?6A! $e9<E9##! '0(0)J! =<?! 56! >:69D:G! A9C! ?56! #66H! ?@! 6#K9K6! C8?5! ;D6B8@<A!
B86CA!8#!@DH6D!?@!E@?8B9?6!58A!@C#-!
! "#!58A!@C#!;58:@A@;58>9:!CD8?8#KAJ!ID6K6!>9E6!?@!A?D6AA!?56!D@:6!@7!C59?!56!
>9::6H! Y6:<>8H9?8@#T! $Y_D:f<?6D<#KT)-! c@?! 6B6DG?58#K! >9#! =6! H678#6HJ! 9?! :69A?!
C8?5@<?!>8D><:9D8?Gg!A@!A@E6?58#K!6:A6!8A!#66H6H!?@!E9O6!>:69D!?56!A6#A6!@7!?56!
E@A?!=9A8>!?6DEAJ!A<>5!9A![!8#!ID6K6TA!>9A6![!Y7<#>?8@#TJ!Y@=F6>?TJ!9#H!Y?D<?52B9:<6T-!
458A! 8A! C56D6! 6:<>8H9?8@#! >@E6A! 8#*! ?6DEA! 9D6! 6];:98#6H! =G! <A8#K! ?56E! 8#!
>@#?6]?J!K6A?<D8#K! 9?!?568D! A6#A6!9#H!D6:G8#K!@#!9!hE66?8#K!@7!E8#HAiJ!9A! ID6K6!
;<?!8?!$'W'3J!;-!%%3/'WW1J!;-!.'.)-!ID6K6TA!?5D66!E@A?!79E@<A!6AA9GAJ!YI<#>?8@#!
9#H! X@#>6;?TJ! Y,#! N6#A6! 9#H! L676D6#>6TJ! 9#H! Y,#! X@#>6;?! 9#H! ,=F6>?TJ! 9::!
;<=:8A56H! 8#! ?56! 69D:G! '0W&AJ! A5@<: H! =6! A66#! 9A! 6AA6#?89::G! ,'#4.7&*"$1! 8#!
;D6>8A6:G!?58A!C9G*!?56G!9D6!8#?6#H6H!?@!E9O6!>:69D!?56!A6#A6!@7!?56!O6G!?6DEA!@7!
ID6K6TA! ;58:@A@;5GJ! C8?5@<?! C58>5! 58A! @C#! :@K8>8A? ! ;D@F6>?! C@<:H! #@?! =6!
<#H6DA?@@H-!
! I@D!ID6K6J!6:<>8H9?8@#!@>><DA!@#:G!9?!?56!;D62?56@D6?8>9:!A?9K6J!;D6;9D8#K!
?56! >@#>6;?<9:! =<8:H8#K2=:@>OA! 7@D! ?56@DG2>@#A?D<>?8@#-! e<?! ?58A! H@6A! #@?!
H8E8#8A5!8?A!8E;@D?9#>6J!7@D!C8?5@<?!>:9D8?G!9=@<?!8?A!E@A?!=9A8>!?6DEAJ! #@!?56@DG!
C8::!=6! >@#B8#>8#K-!"7!C6!=69D!8#!E8#H!?56!9HB8>6!?59?!ID6K6!566H6H!8#!CD8?8#K!?56!

! 2./*"$."5$&0+16(-+.'"/"0+1(") (2 . /* " $ 1(&%7(*+,(2./*"$.4&'(8#$%(.%(3%&'1*.4(-+.'"/"0+1! 3!
456!78#9:!;<=:8>9?8@#!8A!9B98:9=:6!9?*!CCC-=D8::->@E/F@<D#9:2;58:@A@;5G258A?@DG!
:"#%7&*."%/J!?56#!C6! >9#!A66!?59?!6:<>8H9?8@#!C8::!8#6B8?9=:G!59B6!9#!58A?@D8>9:!
H8E6#A8@#-! I@D! ?56! E@A?! =9A8>! ?6DEA! @#6! <A6A! C8::! #66H! ?@! =6! 6];:98#6H! =G!
>:9D87G8#K!?568D!D6:9?8@#!?@!9#G!A8E8:9D!?6DEA!<A6H!=G!;D6B8@<A!?58#O6DA-!"#H66HJ!
ID6K6!58EA6:7!;@8#?6H!@<?!?59?!56!C 9A!<A8#K!?6DEA!A<>5!9A!Y7<#>?8@#TJ!Y>@#>6;?TJ!
9#H!Y@=F6>?T!8#!A:8K5?: G!H8776D6#?!A6#A6A!?@!?5@A6!?59?!?56!?6DEA!59H!59H!8#!69D:86D!
<A6A-! 4@! >9;?<D6! ?58AJ! "! 59B6! A<KK6A?6H! ?59?! C6! ?9:O! @7! Y58A?@D8>9:! 6:<>8H9?8@#T!
$e69#6G! %&&(9)-! 456! 9D?8><:9?8@#! @7! 9#G! ;58:@A@;58>9:! ?56@DG! @D! B86C! D6V<8D6A!
78]8#K!?56!A6#A6A!@7!O6G!?6DEAJ!9#H!K8B6#!?56! H8A;<?6A!?59?! ?56D6!59B6!=66#!8#!?56!
58A?@DG! @7! ;58:@A@;5G! 9=@<?! ?56! A6#A6A! @7! O6G! ;58:@A@;58>9:! ?6DEAJ! ;9D?! @7! ?56!
6:<>8H9?8@#! D6V<8D6H! C8::! 8#B@:B6! H8A?8#K<8A58#K! ?56! A6#A6A! 8#?6#H6H! 7D@E! ?56!
A6#A6A!?59?!@?56DA!59B6!6];D6AA6H!8#!<A8#K!?56!A9E6!@D!A8E8:9D!?6DEA!8#!?56!;9A?-!
! "#! 58A! 8#?D@H<>?8@#! ?@! ?56! :"#%7&*."%/J! ID6K6! 59H! 79E@<A:G! >D8?8>8^6H!
Y58A?@D8>9:T!8#B6A?8K9?8@#A*!
The historical mode of investigation, which seeks to trace the development of things
from which to understand their nature, is certainly legitimate; but it also has its
limitations. If everything were in continual flux and nothing remained fixed and
eternal, then knowledge of the world would cease to be possible and everything would
be thrown into confusion. We imagine, it seems, that concepts originate in the
individual mind like leaves on a tree, and we suppose that their nature can be
understood by investigating their origin and seeking to explain them psychologically
through the working of the human mind. But this conception makes everything
subjective, and taken to its logical conclusion, abolishes truth. What is called the
history of concepts is really either a history of our knowledge of concepts or of the
meanings of words. Often it is only through enormous intellectual work, which can last
for hundreds of years, that knowledge of a concept in its purity is achieved, by peeling
off the alien clothing that conceals it from the mind’s eye. (1884, p. VII/1997, p. 88)
!
! a69B8#K!9A8H6!?56!j:9?@#8A?!B86C!@7!>@#>6;?A!?59?!?58A!;9AA9K6!A<KK6A?A!$8#!
@;;@A8?8@#! ?@! 9! ;AG>5@:@K8A?8>! B86C)J! C6! >9#! 9KD66! C8?5! ID6K6! ?59?! h6#@DE@<A!
8#?6::6>?<9:!C@DOi!E9G!=6!D6V<8D6H!?@!K6?!>:69D!9=@<?!O6G!;58:@A@;58>9:!>@#>6;?A-!
M59?!ID6K6!H6A>D8=6A!9A!>@E8#K!?@!O#@C!?56!D6:6B9#?! >@#>6;?!h8#!8?A!;<D8?Gi!E9G!
=6!:6AA!>@#?D@B6DA89::G!6];D6AA6H!9A!78]8#K!?56!A6#A6!@7!9!?6DE!9A!<A6H!8#!9!K8B6#!
>@#?6]?! $A9GJ! 8#! ;<DA<8#K! 9! ;9D?8><:9D! ;58:@A@;58>9:! ;D@F6>?)-! P@C6B6D! 8?! 8A!
H6A>D8=6HJ! ?5@<K5J!Y58A?@D8>9:T!8#B6A?8K9?8@#A! E9G! 9>?<9::G! =6! 6AA6#?89:![!#@?! =G!
6];:98#8#K!?56!>@#>6;?A!;AG>5@:@K8>9::G!=<?!=G!>9D67<::G!>59D?8#K!?56!>59#K6A!8#!
A6#A6A! @7! ?56! D6:6B9#?! ?6DEA-! ID6K6! E9G! #@?! 59B6! H@#6! ?58A! 58EA6:7! 8#! 9#G!

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Nov 2019
TL;DR: The analytic tradition in philosophy is associated with the mathematical logic of Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, Gödel, and Tarski as mentioned in this paper, which makes for a lingua franca, an admirable prevailing level of clarity and rigor, and interdisciplinary permeability with cognate fields sharing this affiliation.
Abstract: A great strength of the analytic tradition in philosophy (I count myself among it) is its affiliation with the mathematical logic of Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, Gödel, and Tarski: all graduate students are forced to learn its basics, and soon come to discipline their thoughts to fit its structures. This makes for a lingua franca, an admirable prevailing level of clarity and rigor, and interdisciplinary permeability with cognate fields sharing this affiliation. These all contribute to the continuing growth and dynamism of the global analytic-philosophical research community, which shows no sign of losing steam. But mathematical logic is not theory-neutral. Its characteristic use of truth as the fundamental analysans for validity and entailment reflects its origins as a tool for representing the discourse of the natural sciences, which aim at the truth from ‘outside’ their subject-matter. And—though this would conflict with the ‘unity of science’ (Carnap 1928/1927, Oppenheim and Putnam 1958) characteristically embraced by the analytic tradition—perhaps the discourse of the ‘human’ sciences is fundamentally different. After all, a disjuncture between ‘naturalistic’ and ‘humanistic’ discourse—less poetically, physical and mental—is the mainstay of the continental hermeneutic tradition (Schleiermacher 1834/1998, Dilthey 1883/1989, Gadamer 1976, Ricouer 1981); and for the twentieth-century anglophone nonanalytic philosopher Collingwood (1933/2005, 1946/1993), the ‘relation between the sciences of the body, or natural sciences, and the sciences of the mind[] is the relation inquiry into which ought to be substituted for the make-believe inquiry into the make-believe problem of ‘the relation between body and mind’ ’ (Collingwood 1942/92, 2.49). More specifically,

55 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Nov 2019

51 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Nov 2019

50 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Nov 2019

48 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Nov 2019

47 citations

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1959
TL;DR: A survey such as this by one of the world's leading thinkers of his entire philosophical canon, is clearly as important as it is fascinating as discussed by the authors, and it is a masterpiece of philosophical autobiography.
Abstract: A survey such as this by one of the world's leading thinkers of his entire philosophical canon, is clearly as important as it is fascinating. It is a masterpiece of philosophical autobiography.

379 citations

Peer ReviewDOI
01 Aug 2022
TL;DR: A survey such as this by one of the world's leading thinkers of his entire philosophical canon, is clearly as important as it is fascinating as mentioned in this paper , and it is a masterpiece of philosophical autobiography.
Abstract: A survey such as this by one of the world's leading thinkers of his entire philosophical canon, is clearly as important as it is fascinating. It is a masterpiece of philosophical autobiography.

299 citations

Book
01 Jul 1985

257 citations

01 Jan 2007

246 citations

Book
01 Jan 1900
TL;DR: A critical exposition of the philosophy of Leibniz is given in this paper, where it is shown that a critical exposition can be found in the work of the author of this article.
Abstract: A critical exposition of the philosophy of Leibniz : , A critical exposition of the philosophy of Leibniz : , کتابخانه دیجیتال و فن آوری اطلاعات دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)

240 citations

Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

This article has three main interconnected aims.