scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation

Helena Garriga, +2 more
- 01 Sep 2013 - 
- Vol. 34, Iss: 9, pp 1134-1144
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Although constraints lead to a broader but shallower search, external knowledge is associated with the breadth and the depth of the search in a U-shaped relationship.
Abstract
Laursen and Salter (2006) examined the impact of a firm's search strategy for external knowledge on innovative performance. Based on organizational learning and open innovation literature, we extend the model hypothesizing that the search strategy itself is impacted by firm context. That is, both ‘constraints on the application of firm resources’ and the ‘abundance of external knowledge’ have a direct impact on innovative performance and a firm's search strategy in terms of breadth and depth. Based on a survey of Swiss-based firms, we find that constraints decrease and external knowledge increases innovative performance. Although constraints lead to a broader but shallower search, external knowledge is associated with the breadth and the depth of the search in a U-shaped relationship. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors find a concave relationship between firms' breadth of external search and formal collaboration for innovation, and the strength of the firms' appropriability strategies for innovation.
Journal ArticleDOI

The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present opportunities for future research on OI, organized at different levels of analysis, and discuss some of the contingencies at these different levels, and argue that future research needs to study OI - originally an organisational-level phenomenon.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)

TL;DR: The manufacturing systems of the future, including manufacturing execution systems (MES) will have to be built to support this paradigm shift in industry 4.0.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define dynamic capability as the potential to systematically solve problems, enabled by its propensity to sense opportunities and threats, to make timely decisions, and to implement strategic decisions and changes efficiently, thereby ensuring the right direction.
Journal ArticleDOI

External knowledge and information technology: implications for process innovation performance

TL;DR: The knowledge-based view of the firm is drawn to investigate how search in external knowledge sources and information technology for knowledge absorption jointly influence process innovation performance, and how firms should coordinate strategies for sourcing external knowledge with specific IT investments in order to improve their innovation performance.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the ability of a firm to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends is critical to its innovative capabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Resource-Based View of the Firm

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the usefulness of analyzing firms from the resource side rather than from the product side, in analogy to entry barriers and growth-share matrices, the concepts of resource position barrier and resource-product matrices are suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that an increasingly important unit of analysis for understanding competitive advantage is the relationship between firms and identify four potential sources of interorganizational competitive advantage: relation-specific assets, knowledge-sharing routines, complementary resources/capabilities, and effective governance.
Journal ArticleDOI

The myopia of learning

TL;DR: The imperfections of learning are not so great as to require abandoning attempts to improve the learning capabilities of organizations, but that those imperfections suggest a certain conservatism in expectations.

Myopia of learning

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the ways organizations approach these problems through simplification and specialization and how those approaches contribute to three forms of learning myopia, the tendency to overlook distant times, distant places, and failures, and identify some ways in which organizations sustain exploration in the face of a tendency to overinvest in exploitation.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation?

Constraints decrease innovative performance, while external knowledge increases it. Constraints lead to a broader but shallower search, while external knowledge is associated with the breadth and depth of the search in a U-shaped relationship.