scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

How the clear-sky angle of polarization pattern continues underneath clouds: full-sky measurements and implications for animal orientation

01 Sep 2001-The Journal of Experimental Biology (J Exp Biol)-Vol. 204, Iss: 17, pp 2933-2942
TL;DR: It is demonstrated quantitatively that the shorter the wavelength, the greater the proportion of celestial polarization that can be used by animals under cloudy-sky conditions, as has already been suggested by others, may solve the ultraviolet paradox of polarization vision in insects.
Abstract: One of the biologically most important parameters of the cloudy sky is the proportion P of the celestial polarization pattern available for use in animal navigation. We evaluated this parameter by measuring the polarization patterns of clear and cloudy skies using 180 degrees (full-sky) imaging polarimetry in the red (650 nm), green (550 nm) and blue (450 nm) ranges of the spectrum under clear and partly cloudy conditions. The resulting data were compared with the corresponding celestial polarization patterns calculated using the single-scattering Rayleigh model. We show convincingly that the pattern of the angle of polarization (e-vectors) in a clear sky continues underneath clouds if regions of the clouds and parts of the airspace between the clouds and the earth surface (being shady at the position of the observer) are directly lit by the sun. The scattering and polarization of direct sunlight on the cloud particles and in the air columns underneath the clouds result in the same e-vector pattern as that present in clear sky. This phenomenon can be exploited for animal navigation if the degree of polarization is higher than the perceptual threshold of the visual system, because the angle rather than the degree of polarization is the most important optical cue used in the polarization compass. Hence, the clouds reduce the extent of sky polarization pattern that is useful for animal orientation much less than has hitherto been assumed. We further demonstrate quantitatively that the shorter the wavelength, the greater the proportion of celestial polarization that can be used by animals under cloudy-sky conditions. As has already been suggested by others, this phenomenon may solve the ultraviolet paradox of polarization vision in insects such as hymenopterans and dipterans. The present study extends previous findings by using the technique of 180 degrees imaging polarimetry to measure and analyse celestial polarization patterns.

Summary (1 min read)

Introduction

  • If the sun is not visible (hidden by clouds or vegetation or landmarks, or positioned below the horizon), several species are able to orient by means of the extensive celestial polarization pattern either in the ultraviolet or in the visible (blue or green) range of the spectrum (Wehner, 1976; Wehner, 1991).
  • Here, the authors use a 180 ° (full-sky) imaging polarimeter to determine the pattern of polarization of cloudy skies under clear and partly cloudy sky conditions in the visible range of the spectrum.
  • One of the biologically most important parameters of a cloudy sky is the proportion P of the celestial polarization pattern that is available to the animal’s polarization compass.
  • The scattering and polarization of direct sunlight on the cloud particles and in the air columns underneath the clouds result in the same e-vector pattern as that present in clear sky.
  • Characteristics (i-v) describe how the angular imaging, intensity, polarization and spectral composition of the incident light are influenced by the optics and detector of the polarimeter and by the scanner .

2936 I. POMOZI, G. HORVÁTH AND R. WEHNER

  • Clear sky Rayleigh sky Cloudy sky 2937Polarization of cloudy skies and animal navigation pixel belonged to a cloud, otherwise it was attributed to the clear blue sky.
  • Fig. 1G,H and Fig. 2G,H represent the patterns of the degree and angle of polarization of cloudy skies shown in Fig. 1F and Fig. 2F, respectively, measured again in the blue (450 nm) spectral range.
  • The most striking observation from Fig. 1G and Fig. 2G is that the degree of polarization is strongly reduced in those regions of the sky in which clouds appear.
  • The polarizationsensitive visual system of crickets determines the direction of the sun from the distribution of the angle of polarization of the clear sky (χclear sky).

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Figures (5)

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

University of Zurich
Zurich Open Repository and Archive
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zurich
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Year: 2001
How the clear-sky angle of polarization pattern continues
underneath clouds: full-sky measurements and implications for
animal orientation
Pomozi, I; Horváth, G; Wehner, R
Pomozi, I; Horváth, G; Wehner, R. How the clear-sky angle of polarization pattern continues underneath clouds:
full-sky measurements and implications for animal orientation. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204(Pt 17):2933-42.
Postprint available at:
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich.
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Originally published at:
J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204(Pt 17):2933-42
Pomozi, I; Horváth, G; Wehner, R. How the clear-sky angle of polarization pattern continues underneath clouds:
full-sky measurements and implications for animal orientation. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204(Pt 17):2933-42.
Postprint available at:
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich.
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Originally published at:
J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204(Pt 17):2933-42

How the clear-sky angle of polarization pattern continues
underneath clouds: full-sky measurements and implications for
animal orientation
Abstract
One of the biologically most important parameters of the cloudy sky is the proportion P of the celestial
polarization pattern available for use in animal navigation. We evaluated this parameter by measuring
the polarization patterns of clear and cloudy skies using 180 degrees (full-sky) imaging polarimetry in
the red (650 nm), green (550 nm) and blue (450 nm) ranges of the spectrum under clear and partly
cloudy conditions. The resulting data were compared with the corresponding celestial polarization
patterns calculated using the single-scattering Rayleigh model. We show convincingly that the pattern of
the angle of polarization (e-vectors) in a clear sky continues underneath clouds if regions of the clouds
and parts of the airspace between the clouds and the earth surface (being shady at the position of the
observer) are directly lit by the sun. The scattering and polarization of direct sunlight on the cloud
particles and in the air columns underneath the clouds result in the same e-vector pattern as that present
in clear sky. This phenomenon can be exploited for animal navigation if the degree of polarization is
higher than the perceptual threshold of the visual system, because the angle rather than the degree of
polarization is the most important optical cue used in the polarization compass. Hence, the clouds
reduce the extent of sky polarization pattern that is useful for animal orientation much less than has
hitherto been assumed. We further demonstrate quantitatively that the shorter the wavelength, the
greater the proportion of celestial polarization that can be used by animals under cloudy-sky conditions.
As has already been suggested by others, this phenomenon may solve the ultraviolet paradox of
polarization vision in insects such as hymenopterans and dipterans. The present study extends previous
findings by using the technique of 180 degrees imaging polarimetry to measure and analyse celestial
polarization patterns.

Many animals use the sun as a compass. If the sun is not
visible (hidden by clouds or vegetation or landmarks, or
positioned below the horizon), several species are able to orient
by means of the extensive celestial polarization pattern either
in the ultraviolet or in the visible (blue or green) range of the
spectrum (Wehner, 1976; Wehner, 1991). For clear skies, this
pattern is quite regular and depends strongly on the celestial
position of the sun. If the sky is partly clouded, its polarization
pattern is rather complex because the polarization of the blue
sky is disturbed by the clouds. Existing measurements of the
polarization characteristics of partly clouded skies have not
been carried out under wide-field conditions and, hence, are
inadequate if one wishes to deduce biologically relevant
information. Here, we use a 180° (full-sky) imaging
polarimeter to determine the pattern of polarization of cloudy
skies under clear and partly cloudy sky conditions in the visible
range of the spectrum.
Many animals can infer the position of the sun from the
distribution of the angle of polarization obtained from
restricted regions of clear sky. Bees, for example, which often
fly with most of their field of view obscured by vegetation, can
orient correctly even if only spots of blue skylight are visible.
Under certain conditions, skylight windows as small as 1° in
diameter suffice (Edrich and von Helversen, 1976). Depending
on the species, polarized light stimulating exclusively the
ultraviolet, blue or green receptors located within specialized
dorsal rim areas of the eye is sufficient for polarized light
navigation. The required degree of polarization for successful
navigation within a patch of skylight can be as low as 5–10%
(bees, Wehner, 1991; crickets, Labhart, 1996).
One of the biologically most important parameters of a
cloudy sky is the proportion P of the celestial polarization
pattern that is available to the animal’s polarization compass.
This parameter of clear or cloudy skies has largely been
ignored in measurements of skylight polarization. Exceptions
are the studies of Brines and Gould (Brines and Gould, 1982),
2933
The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 2933–2942 (2001)
Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2001
JEB3412
One of the biologically most important parameters of
the cloudy sky is the proportion P of the celestial
polarization pattern available for use in animal
navigation. We evaluated this parameter by measuring the
polarization patterns of clear and cloudy skies using 180°
(full-sky) imaging polarimetry in the red (650nm), green
(550nm) and blue (450nm) ranges of the spectrum under
clear and partly cloudy conditions. The resulting data
were compared with the corresponding celestial
polarization patterns calculated using the single-scattering
Rayleigh model. We show convincingly that the pattern of
the angle of polarization (e-vectors) in a clear sky
continues underneath clouds if regions of the clouds and
parts of the airspace between the clouds and the earth
surface (being shady at the position of the observer) are
directly lit by the sun. The scattering and polarization of
direct sunlight on the cloud particles and in the air
columns underneath the clouds result in the same e-vector
pattern as that present in clear sky. This phenomenon can
be exploited for animal navigation if the degree of
polarization is higher than the perceptual threshold of the
visual system, because the angle rather than the degree of
polarization is the most important optical cue used in the
polarization compass. Hence, the clouds reduce the extent
of sky polarization pattern that is useful for animal
orientation much less than has hitherto been assumed. We
further demonstrate quantitatively that the shorter the
wavelength, the greater the proportion of celestial
polarization that can be used by animals under cloudy-sky
conditions. As has already been suggested by others, this
phenomenon may solve the ultraviolet paradox of
polarization vision in insects such as hymenopterans and
dipterans. The present study extends previous findings
by using the technique of 180° imaging polarimetry to
measure and analyse celestial polarization patterns.
Key words: polarization vision, orientation, polarization compass,
skylight polarization, cloud, cloudy sky, full-sky imaging
polarimetry, ultraviolet vision.
Summary
Introduction
How the clear-sky angle of polarization pattern continues underneath clouds:
full-sky measurements and implications for animal orientation
István Pomozi
1
, Gábor Horváth
1,
* and Rüdiger Wehner
2
1
Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary,
2
Institut für Zoologie, Universität Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Switzerland
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: gh@arago.elte.hu)
Accepted 8 June 2001

2934
who made point-source measurements, and of Labhart
(Labhart, 1999), who used an opto-electronic model to draw
qualitative conclusions on the important role of P in animal
orientation.
It is a well-known phenomenon that distant objects near the
horizon (e.g. forests or mountains) appear blueish in colour
because of Rayleigh scattering of light between the observer
and these distant objects (Können, 1985; Coulson, 1988). The
same phenomenon occurs in the air column underneath clouds.
If part of this column is lit directly by the sun, the distribution
of the angle of polarization of scattered light originating from
the sunlit part of the column is the same as that of the clear
sky. It is less well known that the scattering of direct sunlight
on the cloud particles results in the same e-vector pattern as
that of the blue sky (Können, 1985). As a result of these
scattering phenomena, the angle of polarization of the sky (the
most important optical cue for the animal polarization compass
if the sun is not visible) underneath certain clouds
approximates that of the clear sky. The celestial e-vector
pattern continues underneath clouds under certain atmospheric
conditions, such as when the air columns beneath clouds or
parts of clouds are lit by direct sunlight: (i) obliquely from
above (for smaller solar zenith angles), (ii) from the side (as
with white cumuli) or (iii) from below (as sometimes occurs
at dawn and dusk). The implication here is that the earth’s
surface has to be in sunlight, but not at the position of the
observer. Below, we refer to these illumination conditions
simply as ‘directly lit by the sun’. Apart from heavy overcast
skies with multiple cloud layers, such conditions occur
frequently if the sky is partly cloudy.
Because of the lack of appropriate techniques, satisfactory
measurements of the e-vector pattern in cloudy skies are not
yet available. Using a point-source scanning polarimeter,
Brines and Gould (Brines and Gould, 1982) measured points
at every 5° elevation and azimuth angles within a half-
hemisphere of the sky in 7–8min, during which time the sun
moved approximately 2° along its arc and clouds near the
zenith might have been displaced considerably. Certain
unavoidable errors were a consequence of their rapid
measurement process, such as inaccuracies attendant upon
setting the axes of the instrument. To enhance the spatial
resolution of their samples by one or two orders of magnitude
necessary to obtain the polarization pattern of the entire sky,
their measurements would have required 70–80min or
700–800min, respectively, a period during which the celestial
polarization pattern would change considerably as a result of
the rotation of the earth (it takes 80min for the sun to move by
20°).
The method used by Brines and Gould (Brines and Gould,
1982) – sequential measurements with a point-source scanning
polarimeter – is inappropriate if the recording period is of
sufficient length for the optical characteristics of the sky to
change considerably. This situation will occur if the sky is
cloudy, because clouds move. The displacement of clouds
during such measurements will inevitably introduce so-called
‘motion artefacts’ to the measured values of the degree and
angle of polarization of skylight, reducing their accuracy. It is
clear that the polarization pattern of the whole sky cannot
reliably be measured using such a time-consuming method. In
contrast, an imaging polarimeter can measure reliably (without
motion artefacts) the sky polarization pattern instantaneously
for a huge number of celestial points, even in the presence of
rapid temporal changes (e.g. displacements of clouds).
Here, we have designed and used a full-sky imaging
polarimeter with which the polarization pattern of the entire
sky could be measured instantaneously and accurately under
diverse atmospheric conditions. Our goal was to measure and
compare quantitatively the sky polarization patterns of cloudy
and clear skies for different solar positions. These patterns
were compared with the corresponding celestial polarization
patterns calculated on the basis of the single-scattering
Rayleigh model. We show firstly that the clear-sky angle of
polarization pattern continues underneath clouds under certain
atmospheric conditions. Secondly, we find that the shorter the
wavelength in the visible range of the spectrum, the greater is
the proportion of the celestial polarization pattern available
underneath the clouds for animal navigation. Both results thus
extend the work of Brines and Gould (Brines and Gould,
1982).
The ultraviolet-sensitivity (330–390nm) of the polarization-
sensitive area (POL area) in the dorsal eye region of
hymenopterans and dipterans (Labhart and Meyer, 1999) is
rather surprising because the degree of polarization of scattered
skylight is generally lowest in the ultraviolet spectral region
for clear skies; furthermore, the intensity of skylight is
maximal in the blue range of the spectrum rather than the
ultraviolet (Können, 1985; Coulson, 1988). Hence, the use of
ultraviolet, the worst wavelength in this regard, is puzzling and
here we term it the ‘ultraviolet paradox of polarization vision’.
If, however, the wavelength-dependent effect observed by us
continues into the ultraviolet range of the spectrum, this
phenomenon may solve the ultraviolet paradox, as suggested
by Brines and Gould (Brines and Gould, 1982), although they
were not able to determine quantitatively the values of P.
Materials and methods
Polarimetric measurements
Our clear-sky polarimetric measurements were performed in
the Tunisian Chott el Djerid (33°52 N, 8°22 E), 10km from
Kriz, Tunisia, on 26 August 1999, when the sky was clear
throughout the day. At the measurement site, sunrise and
sunset was at 06:00h and 18:55h (local summer time =
UTC+1, where UTC is universal time code), respectively. We
measured the polarization pattern of the entire clear sky hourly
after sunrise.
The cloudy-sky polarimetric measurements were carried out
at different places and times in Tunisia from the end of August
to the beginning of September 1999. From the cloudy-sky
polarization patterns measured using full-sky imaging
polarimetry, patterns were selected in which the solar zenith
angle θ
s
was approximately the same as those in the clear skies
I. POMOZI, G. HORVÁTH AND R. WEHNER

2935Polarization of cloudy skies and animal navigation
shown in Fig. 1A–C, Fig. 2A–C. To facilitate visual
comparison, the colour photographs and the patterns of the
degree and angle of polarization of the cloudy sky with a given
θ
s
of the sun were appropriately rotated until the solar azimuth
angle coincided with that in the corresponding clear sky.
Measurement of the celestial polarization pattern using full-
sky imaging polarimetry
The full-sky imaging polarimetric technique used here is
similar to the method of Voss and Liu (Voss and Liu, 1997).
An angle of view of 180° was ensured by using a fisheye lens
(Nikon-Nikkor, F=2.8, focal length 8mm) including a built-in
rotating disc mounted with three broad-band (275–750nm)
neutral density (grey) linear polarization filters (HNPB,
Polaroid Corporation, Polaroid Europe Ltd, London, UK) with
three different polarization axes (0°, 45° and 90° measured
from the radius of the disc). The detector was a photoemulsion
in a photographic camera (Nikon F801): Fujichrome Sensia II
100 ASA colour reversal film; the maxima and half-bandwidths
of its spectral sensitivity curves were λ
red
=650±30nm,
λ
green
=550±30nm, λ
blue
=450±50nm. From a given sky, three
photographs were taken for the three different alignments of
the transmission axis of the polarizers on the built-in rotating
disc. The camera was set up on a tripod such that its axis
passing through the view-finder pointed northwards and the
optical axis of the fisheye lens was vertical.
Using a personal computer, after eight-bit (true colour)
digitization (using a Hewlett Packard ScanJet 6100C) and
evaluation of the three developed colour pictures for a given
sky, the patterns of brightness, and the degree and angle of
polarization of skylight, were determined and visualized
as high-resolution, colour-coded, two-dimensional circular
maps. Each map contains approximately 543000 pixels, i.e.
represents approximately 543000 measured numerical values
in a given region of the spectrum. These patterns were obtained
in the red, green and blue spectral ranges, in which the three
colour-sensitive layers of the photoemulsion used have
maximal sensitivity. The red, green and blue spectral ranges
were obtained by using the scanner’s digital image-processing
program to separate the colour channels in the digitized
images. This computerized evaluation of the three digitized
photographs of a given sky is very similar to the
videopolarimetry technique of Horváth and Varjú (Horváth
and Varjú, 1997).
Our imaging polarimeter was calibrated as follows. The
colour reversal films were all developed in the same
professional photographic laboratory (in Budapest) using the
same automatically controlled method. During evaluation of
the recordings to obtain the brightness, degree and angle of
polarization of skylight, the following characteristics of the
recording and digitizing system were taken into consideration:
(i) the measured Mueller matrix of the fisheye lens as a
function of the angle of incidence with respect to the optical
axis; (ii) the measured angular distortion of the fisheye lens
versus the angle of incidence; (iii) the decrease in light
intensity imaged on the photoemulsion because of the decrease
in the effective aperture with increasing angle of incidence; (iv)
the colour density curves of the colour reversal films (used as
detectors) provided by the manufacturer; (v) the measured
brightness and contrast transfer function of the scanner used
for digitization of the colour slides of the sky. Characteristics
(i-v) describe how the angular imaging, intensity, polarization
and spectral composition of the incident light are influenced by
the optics and detector (photoemulsion) of the polarimeter and
by the scanner (digitization). Although the responses of both
the photographic film and scanner were non-linear, this was
taken into account, because the transfer function between the
digital brightness values and the density values of the
photoemulsion was measured, and the incident light intensity
was calculated from this using the density-exposure
characteristic curves of the film (provided by the
manufacturer). Further details of the calibration of our
polarimeter and the evaluation process have been published
elsewhere (Gál et al., 2001).
Polarization calculations using the single-scattering Rayleigh
model
The three-dimensional celestial hemisphere was represented
in two dimensions by a polar-coordinate system, where the
zenith angle θ and the azimuth angle ϕ from West are measured
radially and tangentially, respectively. In this two-dimensional
coordinate system, the zenith is at the origin and the horizon
corresponds to the outermost circle.
The theoretical patterns of the degree and angle of
polarization of skylight were calculated using the single-
scattering Rayleigh model (Coulson, 1988). In the single-
scattering Rayleigh atmosphere, the degree of linear
polarization of skylight δ is expressed in Equation 1 and
Equation 2 as:
δ=δ
max
sin
2
γ/(1+cos
2
γ), (1)
cosγ=sinθ
s
sinθcosψ+cosθ
s
cosθ, (2)
where γ is the angular distance between the observed celestial
point and the sun, θ
s
is the solar zenith angle and θ and ψ are
the angular distances of the observed point from the zenith and
the solar meridian, respectively. For a given θ
s
, δ
max
was
determined from the patterns of the degree of polarization of
skylight measured by full-sky imaging polarimetry. In the
single-scattering Rayleigh atmosphere, the direction (or angle)
of polarization is perpendicular to the plane of scattering
determined by the observer, the celestial point observed and
the sun. In the single-scattering Rayleigh model, the
polarization of skylight is independent of the wavelength.
Algorithmic recognition of clouds and overexposed areas in
the sky
Clouds were recognized in the digitized pictures of the sky
using the following algorithm. The light intensities I
r
, I
g
, I
b
of
every pixel of the picture measured in the red, green and blue
spectral ranges, respectively, were compared with each other.
If the differences I
br
=|I
b
–I
r
| and I
bg
=|I
b
–I
g
| were smaller
than ε=cI
b
(where c is a constant), it was assumed that the given

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present and discuss the state of the art in studies of desert ant (Cataglyphis) navigation using path integration as an egocentric guideline to acquire con- tinually updated spatial information about places and routes.
Abstract: This essay presents and discusses the state of the art in studies of desert ant (Cataglyphis) navigation. In dealing with behavioural performances, neural mechanisms, and ecological functions these studies ultimately aim at an evolutionary understanding of the insect's navigational toolkit: its skylight (polarization) compass, its path integrator, its view-dependent ways of recognizing places and following landmark routes, and its strategies of flexibly interlinking these modes of navigation to generate amazingly rich behavioural out- puts. The general message is thatCataglyphis uses path integration as an egocentric guideline to acquire con- tinually updated spatial information about places and routes. Hence, it relies on procedural knowledge, and largely context-dependent retrieval of such knowledge, rather than on all-embracing geocentred representations of space.

541 citations

BookDOI
01 Jan 2004

266 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The hypothesis entertained in this account is that polarization vision comes in various guises, and that the answer to the question posed in the title is most probably no.
Abstract: In this concept paper, three scenarios are described in which animals make use of polarized light: the underwater world, the water surface and the terrestrial habitat vaulted by the pattern of polarized light in the sky. Within these various visual environments, polarized light is used in a number of ways that make quite different demands on the neural circuitries mediating these different types of behaviour. Apart from some common receptor and pre-processing mechanisms, the underlying neural mechanisms may differ accordingly. Often, information about chi (the angle of polarization), d (the degree of polarization) and lambda (the spectral content) might not --and need not--be disentangled. Hence, the hypothesis entertained in this account is that polarization vision comes in various guises, and that the answer to the question posed in the title is most probably no.

221 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Long segments of virtual flight paths of tethered, flying, migratory monarch butterflies were reconstructed, and by advancing or retarding the butterflies' circadian clocks, it is shown that they possess a time-compensated sun compass.
Abstract: A newly developed flight simulator allows monarch butterflies to fly actively for up to several hours in any horizontal direction while their fall migratory flight direction can be continuously recorded. From these data, long segments of virtual flight paths of tethered, flying, migratory monarch butterflies were reconstructed, and by advancing or retarding the butterflies' circadian clocks, we have shown that they possess a time-compensated sun compass. Control monarchs on local time fly approximately southwest, those 6-h time-advanced fly southeast, and 6-h time-delayed butterflies fly in northwesterly directions. Moreover, butterflies flown in the same apparatus under simulated overcast in natural magnetic fields were randomly oriented and did not change direction when magnetic fields were rotated. Therefore, these experiments do not provide any evidence that monarch butterflies use a magnetic compass during migration.

181 citations

BookDOI
01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: Horvath and Varju as mentioned in this paper reviewed the advances made since the 2004 Springer volume "Polarized Light in Animal Vision" and provided reviews and synopses of some areas.
Abstract: This book covers advances made since the 2004 Springer volume “Polarized Light in Animal Vision” edited by Horvath and Varju, but also provides reviews and synopses of some areas. Part I examines polarization sensitivity across many animal taxa including vertebrates and invertebrates and details both terrestrial and aquatic life. Part II is devoted to the description of polarized light in nature and explores how the physics of light must be taken into account when understanding how polarized light is detected by the visual system. This includes underwater polarization due to scattering; polarization patterns reflected from freshwater bodies; polarization characteristics of forest canopies; normal and anomalous polarization patterns of the skies; skylight polarization transmitted through Snell’s window and both linearly and circularly polarized signals produced by terrestrial and aquatic animals. This Part also examines polarized “light pollution” induced by anthropogenic factors such as reflection off asphalt surfaces, glass panes, car bodies, and other man-made structures that are now known to form ecological traps for polarotactic insects. Part III surveys some of the practical applications of polarization vision including polarization-based traps for biting insects, ground-based polarimetric cloud detectors and an historical examination of the navigational abilities of Viking seafarers using the sky polarization compass. The deterrent qualities of ungulate pelage to polarization-sensitive biting insects is also examined in this section.

162 citations


Cites background from "How the clear-sky angle of polariza..."

  • ...Certainly, the most exciting recent discovery resulting from full-sky imaging polarimetry was that in the sunlit sky underneath the clouds (Pomozi et al. 2001) and even under moderate overcast conditions (Hegedüs et al. 2007a) and in light fog (Hegedüs et al. 2007b) quite robust E-vector patterns…...

    [...]

  • ...Under a heavily overcast sky when the sun is no longer visible and the degree of skylight polarization is greatly reduced (Pomozi et al. 2001; Hegedüs et al. 2007; see also Chap....

    [...]

References
More filters
BookDOI
01 Jan 1965

605 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Fine‐structural disparities in the design of dorsal rim ommatidia of different insect groups indicate that polarization vision arose polyphyletically in the insects.
Abstract: Apart from the sun, the polarization pattern of the sky offers insects a reference for visual compass orientation. Using behavioral experiments, it has been shown in a few insect species (field crickets, honey bees, desert ants, and house flies) that the detection of the oscillation plane of polarized skylight is mediated exclusively by a group of specialized ommatidia situated at the dorsal rim of the compound eye (dorsal rim area). The dorsal rim ommatidia of these species share a number physiological properties that make them especially suitable for polarization vision: each ommatidium contains two sets of homochromatic, strongly polarization-sensitive photoreceptors with orthogonally-arranged analyzer orientations. The physiological specialization of the dorsal rim area goes along with characteristic changes in ommatidial structure, providing actual anatomical hallmarks of polarized skylight detection, that are readily detectable in histological sections of compound eyes. The presence of anatomically specialized dorsal rim ommatidia in many other insect species belonging to a wide range of different orders indicates that polarized skylight detection is a common visual function in insects. However, fine-structural disparities in the design of dorsal rim ommatidia of different insect groups indicate that polarization vision arose polyphyletically in the insects.

351 citations


"How the clear-sky angle of polariza..." refers background in this paper

  • ...The ultraviolet-sensitivity (330–390 nm) of the polarizationensitive area (POL area) in the dorsal eye region of hymenopterans and dipterans (Labhart and Meyer, 1999) is rather surprising because the degree of polarization of scattered skylight is generally lowest in the ultraviolet spectral region for clear skies; furthermore, the intensity of skylight is maximal in the blue range of the spectrum rather than the ultraviolet (Können, 1985; Coulson, 1988)....

    [...]

Book
01 Feb 1989

294 citations


"How the clear-sky angle of polariza..." refers background or methods or result in this paper

  • ...As there are no known qualitative differences between the polarization characteristics of the sky/clouds in the ultraviolet and blue spectral ranges (Können, 1985; Coulson, 1988), the latter trend, observed for the visible spectral range, can also be extrapolated to the ultraviolet range of the spectrum....

    [...]

  • ...This decrease in the degree of polarization towards shorter wavelengths is in agreement with the results of earlier point-source polarimetric measurements (Coulson, 1988) and is due mainly to the randomizing effects of multiple scattering....

    [...]

  • ...The ultraviolet-sensitivity (330–390 nm) of the polarizationensitive area (POL area) in the dorsal eye region of hymenopterans and dipterans (Labhart and Meyer, 1999) is rather surprising because the degree of polarization of scattered skylight is generally lowest in the ultraviolet spectral region for clear skies; furthermore, the intensity of skylight is maximal in the blue range of the spectrum rather than the ultraviolet (Können, 1985; Coulson, 1988)....

    [...]

  • ...forests or mountains) appear blueish in colour because of Rayleigh scattering of light between the observer and these distant objects (Können, 1985; Coulson, 1988)....

    [...]

  • ...Why is there such diversity and why should ultraviolet receptors be favoured by long-distance navigators such as bees and ants? This appears surprising because, in scattered light, the degree of polarization is lowest in the ultraviolet range of the spectrum (Coulson, 1988; Horváth and Wehner, 1999)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
12 Nov 1988-Nature
TL;DR: Electrophysiological recordings from polarization-opponent interneurons in the optic lobe of crickets receive antagonistic input from polarization sensitive photoreceptors with orthogonally arranged analyser orientations, and are reported on for the first time.
Abstract: Recent behavioural experiments dealing with the mechanism of polarized skylight navigation in bees indicated that processing of e-vector information in the visual system involves antagonistic interaction between polarization-sensitive photoreceptors1,2. Here we report electrophysiological recordings from polarization-opponent interneurons in the optic lobe of crickets. These neurons receive antagonistic input from polarization sensitive photoreceptors with orthogonally arranged analyser orientations. Although polarization-sensitive interneurons have previously been reported from the visual system of crabs3 and goldfish4,5, this is the first demonstration of polarization-opponent units.

225 citations


"How the clear-sky angle of polariza..." refers background in this paper

  • ...…interneurons in the cricket's (Gryllus campestris) medulla that these neurons respond reliably to E-vectors if p > 5% and that the standard deviation for the reliability of the E-vector measurements of these neurons is approximately ±6.5o for 5% ≤ p ≤ 10% and ±4o for p > 10% (Labhart 1988, 1996)....

    [...]

  • ...5 ° for 5 % ≤ δ ≤ 10 % and ±4 ° for δ > 10 % (Labhart, 1988; Labhart, 1996)....

    [...]

Book
01 Jan 1985

182 citations