scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Hyper Relative Order () of Entire Functions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduced hyper relative order (p, q) of entire functions where p, q are positive integers with p>q and proved sum theorem, product theorem and theorem on derivative.
Abstract: Abstract After the works of Lahiri and Banerjee [6] on the idea of relative order (p, q) of entire functions, we introduce in this paper hyper relative order (p, q) of entire functions where p, q are positive integers with p>q and prove sum theorem, product theorem and theorem on derivative.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1932
TL;DR: Alfaro et al. as mentioned in this paper conservado en la Biblioteca del Campus de Mostoles de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (sign. 517.5 TIT THE).
Abstract: Original conservado en la Biblioteca del Campus de Mostoles de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (sign. 517.5 TIT THE).

2,695 citations


"Hyper Relative Order () of Entire F..." refers background in this paper

  • ...When g(z) = exp(z), ρg(f) coincides with the classical definition of order ([15],p-248)....

    [...]

MonographDOI
31 Dec 1964

1,788 citations


"Hyper Relative Order () of Entire F..." refers background in this paper

  • ...([12], p-21) Let f(z) be holomorphic in the circle |z| = 2eR(R > 0) with f(0) = 1 and η be an arbitrary positive number not exceeding 3e 2 ....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define lemmas as functions expx, log#, E[r]-x, AM(X), E^ ^) (m = 0, ± 1, ± 2, • • • ; r= 0, 1, 2,• • • ) all increase monotonically.
Abstract: 2. Definitions. Notations and preparatory lemmas. NOTATION 1. exp =log ^ = x, exp# = log~x = exp(exp'-%) = log(logt~-%) (m = 0, ± 1 , ± 2 , • • • ). NOTATION 2. r r £«(*) n «pro *, Aw(«) n iog w *, E[-r](x) = »/A[r-i](»), Afr-riO*) = a?/£[r-.i](«), x = £M(y) « y = £[r](«) (f = 0, ± 1, ± 2 , • • • ). LEMMAS. 77^ functions expx, log#, E[r](x), AM(X), E^ ^) (m = 0, ± 1 , ± 2 , • • • ; r = 0, 1, 2, • • • ) all increase monotonically and we have

101 citations


"Hyper Relative Order () of Entire F..." refers background in this paper

  • ...[14] D. Sato, On the rate of growth of entire functions of fast growth, Bull....

    [...]

  • ...Following Sato [14], we write log[0] x = x, exp[0] x = x and for positive integer m ≥ 1, log[m] x = log(log[m−1] x), exp[m] x = exp(exp[m−1] x)....

    [...]

  • ...Following Sato [14], we write log x = x, exp x = x and for positive integer m ≥ 1, log x = log(log[m−1] x), exp x = exp(exp[m−1] x)....

    [...]

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, a generalization of the classical concept of growth order of an entire function is proposed, where the authors define the new parameter ρ_g(f), the relative growth order with respect to ρ(z), and establish a direct comparison between the growth of the moduli of two nonconstant entire functions.
Abstract: In this paper, we essay a generalization of the classical concept of growth order of an entire function. We define the new parameter $\rho_g(f)$, the relative growth order of $f(z)$ with respect to $g(z)$, which establishes a direct comparison between the growth of the moduli of two nonconstant entire functions $f$ and $g$. Diverse properties, relative to sum, product, composition, derivative, real and imaginary parts, Nevanlinna’s characteristic and Taylor’s coefficients are studied.

69 citations


"Hyper Relative Order () of Entire F..." refers background in this paper

  • ...In 1988, Bernal [2] introduced the definition of relative order of f with respect to g as ρg(f) = inf{μ > 0 : Mf (r) < Mg(r) for all r > r0(μ) > 0}....

    [...]

  • ...[2] Let g be an entire function which satisfies the property (A), and let σ > 1....

    [...]

  • ...In 1988, Bernal [2] introduced the definition of relative order of f with respect to g as ρg(f) = inf{µ > 0 : Mf (r) < Mg(rµ) for all r > r0(µ) > 0}....

    [...]

  • ...The following definition of Bernal [2] will be needed....

    [...]

  • ...[2] Suppose f is an entire function, α > 1, 0 < β < α, s > 1, 0 < μ < λ and n is a positive integer....

    [...]

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduced the concepts of (p, #)-type and lower (/?, #) type for the function /(z) and obtained their characterizations in terms of the coefficients an in the Taylor series (1. 1).
Abstract: be a nonconstant entire fimction where A0 = 0 and {An}*=1 is the strictly increasing sequence of positive integers such that an Φ 0 for n = l, 2, 3, . . . . The rate of growth of/(z) is studied in [8] in a general manner in terms of its (/?, #)-order and lower (p,

62 citations