scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Improved Patient-Independent System for Detection of Electrical Onset of Seizures.

TL;DR: The study shows that a generalized system to detect the electrical onset of seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy using scalp-recorded EEG is possible, and may have significant implications for the management of seizures, especially in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Abstract: Purpose To design a non-patient-specific system to detect the electrical onset of seizures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Methods We used EEG data from 29 seizures of 18 temporal lobe epilepsy patients who underwent multiday video-scalp EEG monitoring as part of their presurgical evaluations. We segmented each data set into preictal and ictal phases, and identified spectral entropy, spectral energy, and signal energy as useful features for discriminating normal and seizure conditions. The performance of five different classifiers was analyzed using these features to design an automated detection system. Results Among the five classifiers, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine performed with sensitivity (specificity) of 79% (81%), 75% (85%), and 80% (86%), respectively. The other two, linear discriminant algorithm and Naive Bayes classifiers, performed with sensitivity (specificity) of 54% (94%), 47% (96%), respectively. Conclusions The support vector machine-based seizure detection system showed better detection capability in terms of sensitivity and specificity measures as compared to linear discriminant algorithm, Naive Bayes, decision tree, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers. Conclusions Our study shows that a generalized system to detect the electrical onset of seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy using scalp-recorded EEG is possible. If confirmed on a larger data set, our findings may have significant implications for the management of seizures, especially in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed two patient-independent deep learning architectures with different learning strategies that can learn a global function utilizing data from multiple subjects and achieved state-of-the-art performance for seizure prediction on the CHB-MIT-EEG dataset, demonstrating 88.81% and 91.54% accuracy respectively.
Abstract: Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent neurological diseases among humans and can lead to severe brain injuries, strokes, and brain tumors. Early detection of seizures can help to mitigate injuries, and can be used to aid the treatment of patients with epilepsy. The purpose of a seizure prediction system is to successfully identify the pre-ictal brain stage, which occurs before a seizure event. Patient-independent seizure prediction models are designed to offer accurate performance across multiple subjects within a dataset, and have been identified as a real-world solution to the seizure prediction problem. However, little attention has been given for designing such models to adapt to the high inter-subject variability in EEG data. We propose two patient-independent deep learning architectures with different learning strategies that can learn a global function utilizing data from multiple subjects. Proposed models achieve state-of-the-art performance for seizure prediction on the CHB-MIT-EEG dataset, demonstrating 88.81% and 91.54% accuracy respectively. In conclusion, the Siamese model trained on the proposed learning strategy is able to learn patterns related to patient variations in data while predicting seizures. Our models show superior performance for patient-independent seizure prediction, and the same architecture can be used as a patient-specific classifier after model adaptation. We are the first study that employs model interpretation to understand classifier behavior for the task for seizure prediction, and we also show that the MFCC feature map utilized by our models contains predictive biomarkers related to interictal and pre-ictal brain states.

61 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An end-to-end deep learning model that can automatically detect epileptic seizures in multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) recordings is presented and it is demonstrated that this model outperforms both conventional feature extraction methods and state-of-the-art deep learning approaches that rely on larger and more complex network architectures.

23 citations


Cites background from "Improved Patient-Independent System..."

  • ...SVMs are perhaps the most popular classifier, finding use in [17,27,28]....

    [...]

Posted ContentDOI
15 Jul 2019-bioRxiv
TL;DR: Two approaches based on convolution neural networks and artificial neural networks are employed to provide a probability of seizure occurrence in a windowed EEG recording of 18 channels to help neurologists in a time-consuming diagnostic process.
Abstract: This paper aims to apply machine learning techniques to an automated epileptic seizure detection using EEG signals to help neurologists in a time-consuming diagnostic process We employ two approaches based on convolution neural networks (CNNs) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) to provide a probability of seizure occurrence in a windowed EEG recording of 18 channels In order to extract relevant features based on time, frequency, and time-frequency domains for these networks, we consider an improvement of the Bayesian error rate from a baseline Features of which the improvement rates are higher than the significant level are considered These dominant features extracted from all EEG channels are concatenated as the input for ANN with 7 hidden layers, while the input of CNN is taken as raw multi-channel EEG signals Using multi-concept of deep CNN in image processing, we exploit 2D-filter decomposition to handle the signal in spatial and temporal domains Our experiments based on CHB-MIT Scalp EEG Database showed that both ANN and CNN were able to perform with the overall accuracy of up to 9907% and F1-score of up to 7704% ANN with dominant features is more capable of detecting seizure events than CNN whereas CNN requiring no feature extraction is slightly better than ANN in classification accuracy

23 citations


Cites background from "Improved Patient-Independent System..."

  • ...On the other hand, a seizure is focal-onset when originating within networks limited to one hemisphere, making the EEG changes restricted in a particular brain region [10], [11]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The CHMM model outperforms standard machine learning techniques in the focal dataset and achieves comparable performance to the best baseline method in the pediatric dataset and has the ability to track seizures, which is valuable information to localize focal onset zones.
Abstract: We propose a novel Coupled Hidden Markov Model (CHMM) to detect and localize epileptic seizures in clinical multichannel scalp electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. Our model captures the spatio-temporal spread of a seizure by assigning a sequence of latent states (i.e. baseline or seizure) to each EEG channel. The state evolution is coupled between neighboring and contralateral channels to mimic clinically observed spreading patterns. Since the latent state space is exponential, a structured variational algorithm is developed for approximate inference. The model is evaluated on simulated and clinical EEG from two different hospitals. One dataset contains seizure recordings of adult focal epilepsy patients at the Johns Hopkins Hospital; the other contains publicly available non-specified seizure recordings from pediatric patients at Boston Children’s Hospital. Our CHMM model outperforms standard machine learning techniques in the focal dataset and achieves comparable performance to the best baseline method in the pediatric dataset. We also demonstrate the ability to track seizures, which is valuable information to localize focal onset zones.

13 citations


Cites background from "Improved Patient-Independent System..."

  • ...The SVM has enjoyed wide popularity in the seizure detection literature, especially for patient-specific classification [16], [26]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors lay out reasons for optimism and skepticism about the potential of machine learning to predict seizure occurrence in people who have epilepsy, concluding that "many people will benefit from seizure prediction, but not all will benefit".
Abstract: Great strides have been made recently in documenting that machine-learning programs can predict seizure occurrence in people who have epilepsy. Along with this progress have come claims that appear to us to be a bit premature. We anticipate that many people will benefit from seizure prediction. We also doubt that all will benefit. Although machine learning is a useful tool for aiding discovery, we believe that the greatest progress will come from deeper understanding of seizures, epilepsy, and the EEG features that enable seizure prediction. In this essay, we lay out reasons for optimism and skepticism.

10 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2007-Brain
TL;DR: A critically discuss the literature on seizure prediction and address some of the problems and pitfalls involved in the designing and testing of seizure-prediction algorithms, and point towards possible future developments and propose methodological guidelines for future studies on seizure predictions.
Abstract: The sudden and apparently unpredictable nature of seizures is one of the most disabling aspects of the disease epilepsy. A method capable of predicting the occurrence of seizures from the electroencephalogram (EEG) of epilepsy patients would open new therapeutic possibilities. Since the 1970s investigations on the predictability of seizures have advanced from preliminary descriptions of seizure precursors to controlled studies applying prediction algorithms to continuous multi-day EEG recordings. While most of the studies published in the 1990s and around the turn of the millennium yielded rather promising results, more recent evaluations could not reproduce these optimistic findings, thus raising a debate about the validity and reliability of previous investigations. In this review, we will critically discuss the literature on seizure prediction and address some of the problems and pitfalls involved in the designing and testing of seizure-prediction algorithms. We will give an account of the current state of this research field, point towards possible future developments and propose methodological guidelines for future studies on seizure prediction.

1,018 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results obtained indicate that entropy estimators can distinguish normal and epileptic EEG data with more than 95% confidence (using t-test), and the classification ability of the entropy measures is tested using ANFIS classifier.

701 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2001-Neuron
TL;DR: It is suggested that epileptic seizures may begin as a cascade of electrophysiological events that evolve over hours and that quantitative measures of preseizure electrical activity could possibly be used to predict seizures far in advance of clinical onset.

600 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work proposes a methodology for the automatic detection of normal, pre-ictal, and ictal conditions from recorded EEG signals and shows that the Fuzzy classifier was able to differentiate the three classes with a high accuracy of 98.1%.

534 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The most promising approach for prospective seizure anticipation could be a combination of bivariate and univariate measures, which provide statistically significant evidence for the existence of a preictal state.

500 citations