In the Zone or Zoning Out? Tracking Behavioral and Neural Fluctuations During Sustained Attention
Citations
801 citations
661 citations
Cites background from "In the Zone or Zoning Out? Tracking..."
...In almost any task context, the intensity and direction of control tend to vary over time, both in response to the details of the task and independent of them (Eichele et al. 2008, Esterman et al. 2013, Weissman et al. 2006)....
[...]
408 citations
351 citations
[...]
243 citations
References
3,094 citations
2,515 citations
"In the Zone or Zoning Out? Tracking..." refers background in this paper
...…et al. 2007; Li et al. 2007; Eichele et al. 2008; slower responding, Weissman et al. 2006), but have also been associated with faster responding (Gilbert et al. 2006; Hahn et al. 2007), better target detection (Sadaghiani et al. 2009), and more practiced, effortless performance (Mason et al. 2007)....
[...]
...…aligns well with the widely reported phenomenon of greater task-evoked deactivation with increasing task difficulty (e.g. McKiernan et al. 2003, 2006), as well as with findings of greater deactivation during performance of novel than practiced tasks (Mason et al. 2007; Jolles et al. 2010)....
[...]
...These more dramatic elevations may represent mind-wandering or stimulus-independent processing, functions that have previously been ascribed to the DMN and shown to precede errors (McGuire et al. 1996; McKiernan et al. 2006; Mason et al. 2007; Christoff et al. 2009)....
[...]
2,348 citations
1,748 citations
"In the Zone or Zoning Out? Tracking..." refers methods in this paper
...In these variants of CPTs (e.g. the sustained attention to response task [SART]; Robertson et al. 1997; Conners’ CPT-II; Conners 2000), participants are required to respond on most trials, with rare “stop” trials serving as targets....
[...]