scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Indigenous medicine and cultural hegemony: A study of the revitalization movement in Keralam

01 Aug 1992-Studies in History (Sage PublicationsSage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA)-Vol. 8, Iss: 2, pp 283-308
TL;DR: This paper argued that the progress achieved by the West pointed to the possible directions for future, but how the past should figure in the new order was quite uncertain and underlined the possible loss of cultural heritage.
Abstract: view, critical of traditional cultural and social practices.’ Their agenda for change, however, was not based on westernization, but a selective rejection and reform of the present. The progress achieved by the West pointed to the possible directions for future, but how the past should figure in the new order was quite uncertain. The increasing influence of colonial culture heightened this uncertainty and underlined the possible loss of cultural heritage. As a result the intellectuals were caught in a paradox: to discard the old and create a new cultural milieu, on the one hand, and to preserve or retrieve the traditional cultural space so that past is not swept off the ground. The efforts to reconcile this paradox led to a critical inquiry into both the past as well as the present. The movement for the revitalization of
Citations
More filters
Book
Jürgen Renn1
01 Jan 2018
TL;DR: Second-order knowledge as mentioned in this paper is the origin of self-organizing, self-promoting qualities of knowledge, and it is the reflexivity of knowledge that accounts for its selforganizing and self-defining qualities.
Abstract: object but always involves knowledge about this knowledge as well, that is, meta or second-order knowledge. This reflexivity of knowledge also accounts for its self-organizing, self-promoting qualities. Second-order knowledge is the origin 22

160 citations

Book
16 Dec 2004
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss science, colonialism and modernity in the Indian scientific community, including science under the East India Company, and the steam age technologies in an Indian environment.
Abstract: List of illustrations List of tables General editor's preface Preface List of abbreviations 1. Introduction: science, colonialism and modernity 2. Science under the East India Company 3. Western medicine in an Indian environment 4. Technologies of the steam age 5. Imperial science and the Indian scientific community 6. Science, state and nation Conclusion Biographical notes Bibliographical essay Index.

113 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although the "cultural authority" and hegemony of biomedicine over indigenous science and knowledge were initiated by the colonial state, they were extended by the mainstream national leaderships and national governments with far more extensive and profound implications and less resistance.

86 citations


Cites background from "Indigenous medicine and cultural he..."

  • ...…group of scholars, is a significant lack of focus on the role of public policy and the state (including colonial and national governments) and political economy in the making or unmaking of a knowledge system (Banerji, 1981; Frankenberg, 1980, 1981; Gupta, 1976; Panikkar, 1992; Ramasubban, 1982)....

    [...]

  • ...Common to all these views, as also suggested by a third group of scholars, is a significant lack of focus on the role of public policy and the state (including colonial and national governments) and political economy in the making or unmaking of a knowledge system (Banerji, 1981; Frankenberg, 1980, 1981; Gupta, 1976; Panikkar, 1992; Ramasubban, 1982)....

    [...]

  • ...Here, works of Leslie (1976a, 1976b, 1992), Metcalf (1985), Brass (1972), Panikkar (1992), Arnold and Sarkar (2002), and Quaiser (2001) are particularly useful and can help us in assessing the nationalist discourse....

    [...]

  • ...also been questions raised about class contradictions and hegemonic projects led and sponsored by national elites at the cost of popular medical practices (Arnold, 1993; Metcalf, 1985; Panikkar, 1992)....

    [...]

  • ...S. Khan / Social Science & Medicine 62 (2006) 2786–2797 2787 also been questions raised about class contradictions and hegemonic projects led and sponsored by national elites at the cost of popular medical practices (Arnold, 1993; Metcalf, 1985; Panikkar, 1992)....

    [...]

Dissertation
01 Jan 2010

79 citations

Book
01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: Purifying Empire as discussed by the authors explores the material, cultural and moral fragmentation of the boundaries of imperial and colonial rule in the British Empire in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and charts how a particular bio-political project, namely the drive to regulate the obscene in late nineteenth-century Britain, was transformed from a national into a global and imperial venture and then re-localized in two different colonial contexts, India and Australia, to serve decidedly different ends.
Abstract: Purifying Empire explores the material, cultural and moral fragmentation of the boundaries of imperial and colonial rule in the British Empire in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It charts how a particular bio-political project, namely the drive to regulate the obscene in late nineteenth-century Britain, was transformed from a national into a global and imperial venture and then re-localized in two different colonial contexts, India and Australia, to serve decidedly different ends. While a considerable body of work has demonstrated both the role of empire in shaping moral regulatory projects in Britain and their adaptation, transformation and, at times, rejection in colonial contexts, this book illustrates that it is in fact only through a comparative and transnational framework that it is possible to elucidate both the temporalist nature of colonialism and the political, racial and moral contradictions that sustained imperial and colonial regimes.

50 citations