scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: Construct Clarification and Development of an Internationally Reliable Metric:

01 May 2009-Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (Blackwell Publishing Inc)-Vol. 33, Iss: 3, pp 669-694
TL;DR: In this paper, the construct of individual entrepreneurial intent is clarified and validated using a scale of the scale of individual entrepreneurship intent, and the development and validation of a reliable and internationally applicable individual entrepreneurial intention scale is reported.
Abstract: Individual entrepreneurial intent is a key construct in research on new business formation. However, neither a clear or consistent definition of nor a uniform and reliable way to measure individual entrepreneurial intent has yet emerged. Several management scholars have highlighted the impediment this constitutes to the advancement of entrepreneurship research. This paper first seeks to clarify the construct of individual entrepreneurial intent and then reports the development and validation of a reliable and internationally applicable individual entrepreneurial intent scale.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the importance of theories that predict and explain individuals propensity to start a firm has been highlighted, with increasing interest in the development of entrepreneurial intentions having elevated the importance in theories.
Abstract: Increasing interest in the development of entrepreneurial intentions has elevated the importance of theories that predict and explain individuals’ propensity to start a firm. The purpose of this st...

823 citations


Additional excerpts

  • ...At the measurement level, researchers have used different measures to operationalize EI and its determinants (Shook et al., 2003; Thompson, 2009)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the literature on entrepreneurial intention is carried out, which offers a clearer picture of the sub-fields in entrepreneurial intention research, by concentrating on two aspects: citation analysis and thematic analysis.
Abstract: Entrepreneurial intention is a rapidly evolving field of research. A growing number of studies use entrepreneurial intention as a powerful theoretical framework. However, a substantial part of this research lacks systematization and categorization, and there seems to be a tendency to start anew with every study. Therefore, there is a need to take stock of current knowledge in this field. In this sense, this paper carries out a review of the literature on entrepreneurial intentions. A total of 409 papers addressing entrepreneurial intention, published between 2004 and 2013 (inclusive), have been analyzed. The purpose and contribution of this paper is to offer a clearer picture of the sub-fields in entrepreneurial intention research, by concentrating on two aspects. Firstly, it reviews recent research by means of a citation analysis to categorize the main areas of specialization currently attracting the attention of the academic community. Secondly, a thematic analysis is carried out to identify the specific themes being researched within each category. Despite the large number of publications and their diversity, the present study identifies five main research areas, plus an additional sixth category for a number of new research papers that cannot be easily classified into the five areas. Within those categories, up to twenty-five different themes are recognized. A number of research gaps are singled out within each of these areas of specialization, in order to induce new ways and perspectives in the entrepreneurial intention field of research that may be fruitful in filling these gaps.

720 citations


Cites background from "Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: ..."

  • ...2009), or an EI scale (Thompson 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...Two of these papers are more limited in scope in that they build and test either a multi-dimensional entrepreneurial self-efficacy instrument (McGee et al. 2009), or an EI scale (Thompson 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...Finally, two additional papers focus on methodological issues, developing and validating either a complete questionnaire – entrepreneurial intention questionnaire (EIQ) – to measure TPB constructs (Liñán and Chen 2009) or specifically an EI scale (Thompson 2009)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided empirically-based suggestions for the design of improved entrepreneurship education initiatives based on two essential elements: firstly, an already validated instrument (EIQ); secondly, a statistical method (factor-regression procedure) which is not dependent on any theoretical approach.
Abstract: A considerable agreement exists about the importance of promoting entrepreneurship to stimulate economic development and employment generation In particular, entrepreneurship education has been considered one of the key instruments to increase the entrepreneurial attitudes of both potential and nascent entrepreneurs Nevertheless, the factors that determine the individual’s decision to start a venture are still not completely clear Cognitive approaches have attracted considerable interest recently But the explaining capacity of personality traits or demographic characteristics is still considered Therefore, there is a need to clarify which elements play the most influential role in shaping the personal decision to start a firm This paper tries to contribute to filling this gap by providing empirically-based suggestions for the design of improved entrepreneurship education initiatives The empirical analysis is based on two essential elements: firstly, an already validated instrument (EIQ); secondly, a statistical method (factor-regression procedure) which is not dependent on any theoretical approach It uses all the information collected through the questionnaire items, selecting them solely based on their capacity to explain the dependent variable Results will allow the design of more effective education initiatives They suggest that personal attitude and perceived behavioural control are the most relevant factors explaining entrepreneurial intentions Thus, based on these results, a number of considerations about the most effective role of education in promoting and developing attitudes and intentions towards entrepreneurship are considered Besides, the EIQ could be used as an evaluation instrument for entrepreneurial education programmes

698 citations


Cites background from "Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: ..."

  • ...The latter, in turn, could be defined as the self-acknowledged conviction by a person that they intend to set up a new business venture and consciously plan to do so at some point in the future (Thompson 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...The latter, in turn, could be defined as the selfacknowledged conviction by a person that they intend to set up a new business venture and consciously plan to do so at some point in the future (Thompson 2009)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a negative interaction effect between perceived desirability and perceived feasibility based on regulatory focus theory is investigated in the context of entrepreneurial intentions, and a large multi-country sample confirms this negative interaction.

532 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, an entrepreneurial intention model is developed, theoretically based on the planned behaviour approach, institutional economic theory and social capital theory, to identify some of the environmental cognitive elements that may explain regional differences in start-up intentions.
Abstract: Empirical research has recently paid considerable attention to the role of environmental factors in explaining regional variations in entrepreneurial activity. However, cognitive models have not usually included these factors in their analyses. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to identify some of the environmental cognitive elements that may explain regional differences in start-up intentions. Thus, an entrepreneurial intention model is developed, theoretically based on the planned behaviour approach, institutional economic theory and social capital theory. The empirical analysis is carried out using structural equation techniques over a sample of 549 final year university students from two Spanish regions (Catalonia and Andalusia). Results confirm that valuation of entrepreneurship in each region helps explain regional differences in entrepreneurial intentions. As expected, social valuation of the entrepreneur was higher in the more developed region (Catalonia), positively affecting perceiv...

526 citations


Cites background from "Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: ..."

  • ...In a balanced scale all the item stems are positively worded; however, half of the items measure in one direction of the trait whereas the other half measure in the opposite direction (Thompson 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...Comparisons between these works become quite problematic, since differences among construct measures are sometimes substantial (Thompson 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...Nevertheless, some conflicts have arisen from differences in measures used, as there are not standard measurement instruments for entrepreneurial intention and its antecedents (Armitage and Conner 2001; Liñán and Chen 2009; Thompson, 2009)....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Ajzen, 1985, 1987, this article reviewed the theory of planned behavior and some unresolved issues and concluded that the theory is well supported by empirical evidence and that intention to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high accuracy from attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control; and these intentions, together with perceptions of behavioral control, account for considerable variance in actual behavior.

65,095 citations


"Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: ..." refers background in this paper

  • ...…by those who might not previously have consciously planned to become entrepreneurs, but even then, as motivational theories of behavior suggest (Ajzen, 1991; Fishbein, 1967), the exploitation of such inadvertently discovered opportunities through starting a firm begins, nevertheless, with…...

    [...]

  • ...Such models suggest theoretical continuums of new venture creation stages and concomitant activities that generally begin with individual entrepreneurial intent, in line with Ajzen’s (1991) model of planned behavior. Katz and Gartner (1988), for instance, propose that an initial stage of entrepreneurial intent is followed by a phase of assembling necessary resources. Krueger (1993) posits that entrepreneurial intentions precede the search by budding entrepreneurs for business opportunities. Shook et al. (2003, p. 381) advance a four-stage process that begins with entrepreneurial intent, progresses through business opportunity searching, then a decision phase when opportunity exploitation via a start-up is decided upon, and then, finally, a phase of undertaking activities to set up a firm to grasp identified opportunities. Reynolds et al. (2004, p. 265) propose a sequential scheme in which intending entrepreneurs first “conceive” a business start-up idea, which then goes through a “gestation” period of start-up processes before the actual “birth” of the “infant” firm. These conceptual models of new business formation have proven difficult empirically to establish generally, perhaps because each is somewhat more neatly sequential than available evidence suggests is the messier, nonlinear procedural reality of specific new business formations (Bhave, 1994). Reynolds and Miller (1992), for example, find that the sequencing of new business formation can follow several patterns, and Carter et al....

    [...]

  • ...Such models suggest theoretical continuums of new venture creation stages and concomitant activities that generally begin with individual entrepreneurial intent, in line with Ajzen’s (1991) model of planned behavior. Katz and Gartner (1988), for instance, propose that an initial stage of entrepreneurial intent is followed by a phase of assembling necessary resources. Krueger (1993) posits that entrepreneurial intentions precede the search by budding entrepreneurs for business opportunities....

    [...]

  • ...Such models suggest theoretical continuums of new venture creation stages and concomitant activities that generally begin with individual entrepreneurial intent, in line with Ajzen’s (1991) model of planned behavior. Katz and Gartner (1988), for instance, propose that an initial stage of entrepreneurial intent is followed by a phase of assembling necessary resources. Krueger (1993) posits that entrepreneurial intentions precede the search by budding entrepreneurs for business opportunities. Shook et al. (2003, p. 381) advance a four-stage process that begins with entrepreneurial intent, progresses through business opportunity searching, then a decision phase when opportunity exploitation via a start-up is decided upon, and then, finally, a phase of undertaking activities to set up a firm to grasp identified opportunities. Reynolds et al. (2004, p. 265) propose a sequential scheme in which intending entrepreneurs first “conceive” a business start-up idea, which then goes through a “gestation” period of start-up processes before the actual “birth” of the “infant” firm. These conceptual models of new business formation have proven difficult empirically to establish generally, perhaps because each is somewhat more neatly sequential than available evidence suggests is the messier, nonlinear procedural reality of specific new business formations (Bhave, 1994). Reynolds and Miller (1992), for example, find that the sequencing of new business formation can follow several patterns, and Carter et al. (1996) show that what activities are undertaken, and when, varies considerably in the process of creating a new business....

    [...]

  • ...Such models suggest theoretical continuums of new venture creation stages and concomitant activities that generally begin with individual entrepreneurial intent, in line with Ajzen’s (1991) model of planned behavior....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results is examined, potential sources of method biases are identified, the cognitive processes through which method bias influence responses to measures are discussed, the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases is evaluated, and recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and Statistical remedies are provided.
Abstract: Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.

52,531 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of reward or reinforcement on preceding behavior depend in part on whether the person perceives the reward as contingent on his own behavior or independent of it, and individuals may also differ in generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Abstract: The effects of reward or reinforcement on preceding behavior depend in part on whether the person perceives the reward as contingent on his own behavior or independent of it. Acquisition and performance differ in situations perceived as determined by skill versus chance. Persons may also differ in generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. This report summarizes several experiments which define group differences in behavior when Ss perceive reinforcement as contingent on their behavior versus chance or experimenter control. The report also describes the development of tests of individual differences in a generalized belief in internal-external control and provides reliability, discriminant validity and normative data for 1 test, along with a description of the results of several studies of construct validity.

21,451 citations

Book
21 Jul 2011
TL;DR: Structural Equation Models: The Basics using the EQS Program and testing for Construct Validity: The Multitrait-Multimethod Model and Change Over Time: The Latent Growth Curve Model.
Abstract: Psychology is a science that advances by leaps and bounds The impulse of new mathematical models along with the incorporation of computers to research has drawn a new reality with many methodological progresses that only a few people could imagine not too long ago Such progress has no doubt revolutionized the panorama of research in the behavioral sciences Structural Equation Models are a clear example of this Under this label are usually included a series of state-of-the-art multivariate statistical procedures that allow the researcher to test theoryguided hypotheses with clearly confi rmatory ends as well as to establish causal relations among variables Confi rmatory factor analysis, the study of measurement invariance, or the multitraitmultimethod models are some of the procedures that stem from this methodology In this sense, it would be diffi cult to fi nd a scientifi c journal that publishes empirical works in psychology that does not address some of these issues, so their current transcendence is undeniable The manual written by the Full Professor of the University of Ottawa, Barbara M Byrne, is a link in a series of books that address this topic Throughout her long academic trajectory, Professor Byrne developed interesting and popular work focused on bringing the researcher and the professional layman—and not so layman—closer to the diverse statistical programs available on the market for data analysis from the perspective of structural equation models (ie, LISREL, AMOS, EQS) (Byrne, 1998, 2001, 2006) Bearing this in mind, the main goal of this work is to introduce the reader to the basic concepts of this methodology, in a simple and entertaining way, avoiding mathematical technicisms and statistical jargon For this purpose, we used the statistical program Mplus 60 (Muthen & Muthen, 2007-2010), an extremely suggestive software that incorporates interesting applications The authoress provides a practical guide that leads the reader through illustrative examples of how to proceed step by step with the Mplus, from the initial specifi cations of the model to the interpretation of the output fi les On the one hand, we underline that the data used proceed from prior investigations and can be consulted in the Internet, offering the reader the possibility of practicing with them (http://wwwpsypresscom/sem-with-mplus/ datasets/); on the other hand, updating the information with novel and apt bibliographic references allows the reader to study in more depth the diverse topics that are presented in the manual, if he or she so desires The book consists of four sections, with a total of 12 chapters The fi rst section, Chapters 1 and 2, addresses introductory terms related to structural equation models and working with the Mplus program at a user-level The second unit focuses on data analysis with a single group In Chapter 3, the factor validity of the self-concept is tested by means of confi rmatory factor analysis In Chapter 4, the authoress performs a fi rst-order confi rmatory factor analysis, in which she examines the validity of the scores of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) in a sample of teachers In Chapter 5, the internal structure of the scores on the Beck Depression Inventory-II is analyzed by means of second-order confi rmatory factor analysis in a sample of Chinese adolescents In the next chapter, the complete model of structural equations is tested, and the authoress examines the causal relation established between diverse variables (ie, work climate, self-esteem, social support) and Burnout The third section of the manual is, in my opinion, the most interesting, not only because of the expansion of the study of measurement invariance in recent years but also because of the expansion it may possibly have in the future In this section, Professor Byrne goes into multigroup comparisons Specifi cally, in Chapter 7, she examines the factor equivalence of the MBI in two samples of teachers by means of the analysis of covariance structures In this chapter, she introduces relevant concepts, such as types of invariance (confi gural, metric, and strict) or the invariance of partial measurement In Chapter 8, she also analyzes measurement invariance, using for this purpose the analysis of mean and covariance structures This analysis, in comparison to the analysis of covariance structures, allows contrasting the latent means of two or more groups With this goal, she verifi es whether there is measurement invariance between the scores on the Self-description Questionnaire-I in Nigerian and Australian adolescents In Chapter 9, she proposes a complete model of structural equations in which she tests the causal structure through the procedure of cross validation Lastly, in the fourth section, she reveals three very interesting topics, that are also up-to-date and that, to some degree, go beyond the initial goal of the book, such as the multitrait-multimethod models, latent growth curves, and multilevel models Summing up, the work “Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming” is of enormous interest and utility for all professionals of psychology and related sciences who, without having exhaustive knowledge of the details of structural equation models, wish to test their hypothetical models by means of the Mplus program No doubt, this is a reference manual, a must-read that is accessible and that has a high degree of methodological rigor We hope that the readers

16,616 citations


"Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: ..." refers background or methods in this paper

  • ...This was checked using the cross-group structural model factorial invariance procedure suggested by Byrne (2001)....

    [...]

  • ...90, thereby indicating adequate model fit (Byrne, 2001; Hair, Anderson, Tatham, & Black, 1998). The scale’s summated mean was 3.11 (SD 1.20), significantly below the hypothetical midpoint of 3.50 (t = -3.36; p < .001). As the sample comprised nearly 50% students, and in view of Chen et al.’s (1998) imprecation of the reliance on student samples in entrepreneurship research, separate analyses of the student and nonstudent respondents were undertaken....

    [...]

  • ...90, thereby indicating adequate model fit (Byrne, 2001; Hair, Anderson, Tatham, & Black, 1998)....

    [...]

  • ...Confirmatory factor analysis further supported unidimensionality, with goodness of fit, adjusted goodness of fit, normed fit, and relative fit indices each well above .90, thereby indicating adequate model fit (Byrne, 2001; Hair, Anderson, Tatham, & Black, 1998)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify six categories of self-reports and discuss such problems as common method variance, the consistency motif, and social desirability, as well as statistical and post hoc remedies and some procedural methods for dealing with artifactual bias.

14,482 citations


"Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: ..." refers background in this paper

  • ...A further consideration was to produce a metric ameliorating two measurement-biasing but reducible forms of method variance (Podsakoff & Organ, 1986)....

    [...]