Inequity In Social Exchange
Citations
6,492 citations
5,097 citations
Cites background or methods or result from "Inequity In Social Exchange"
...If this had not been the case, then the procedural justice literature would have contributed little over earlier work by Homans (1961), Adams (1965), Leventhal (1976), and Deutsch (1975). Our results showed that, when distributive justice was controlled, only Leventhal criteria and interpersonal justice retained their explanatory power. Because process control added little, it is tempting to conclude that measuring it is unnecessary if distributive justice and Leventhal criteria are also being considered. Perhaps this is not surprising given Lind and Tyler's (1988) assertion that Leventhal's "representativeness" criterion includes the process control concept. Turning to our third type of research question, reactive research, we tested three separate reactive models: Leventhal's (1980) distributive dominance model, Sweeney and McFarlin's (1993) twofactor model, and Bies and Moag's (1986) agent-system model....
[...]
...If this had not been the case, then the procedural justice literature would have contributed little over earlier work by Homans (1961), Adams (1965), Leventhal (1976), and Deutsch (1975)....
[...]
...distributive justice (Adams, 1965; Deutsch, 1975; Homans, 1961; Leventhal, 1976) and procedural justice (Leventhal, 1980; Leventhal, Karuza, & Fry, 1980; Thibaut & Walker, 1975)....
[...]
...If this had not been the case, then the procedural justice literature would have contributed little over earlier work by Homans (1961), Adams (1965), Leventhal (1976), and Deutsch (1975). Our results showed that, when distributive justice was controlled, only Leventhal criteria and interpersonal justice retained their explanatory power....
[...]
...distributive justice (Adams, 1965; Deutsch, 1975; Homans, 1961; Leventhal, 1976) and procedural justice (Leventhal, 1980; Leventhal, Karuza, & Fry, 1980; Thibaut & Walker, 1975). Efforts to explain the impact of justice on effective organizational functioning have come under the rubric of organizational justice research (Greenberg, 1987b, 1990b). Greenberg (1990b) described organizational justice as a literature "grown around attempts to describe and explain the role of fairness as a consideration in the workplace" (p....
[...]
4,482 citations
Cites background or result from "Inequity In Social Exchange"
...Initially, researchers focused on the justice of decision outcomes, termed distributive justice (Adams, 1965; Deutsch, 1975; Homans, 1961; Leventhal, 1976)....
[...]
..., Adams, 1965; Deutsch, 1975; Romans, 1961; Leventhal, 1976). Leventhal (1976) described the equity rule as "a single normative rule which dictates that rewards and resources be distributed in accordance with recipients' contributions" (p. 94). Deutsch (1975) described the equity rule as "a proportionality between the individual's outcome of rewards and costs (i.e., of things of intrinsic value) and his inputs or contributions of assets and liabilities" (p. 144). Although other allocation rules, such as equality or need, are certainly important in many situations, the distributive justice measure in this study reflected Leventhal's (1976) conceptualization of the equity rule to maximize generalizability....
[...]
..., Adams, 1965; Deutsch, 1975; Romans, 1961; Leventhal, 1976). Leventhal (1976) described the equity rule as "a single normative rule which dictates that rewards and resources be distributed in accordance with recipients' contributions" (p. 94). Deutsch (1975) described the equity rule as "a proportionality between the individual's outcome of rewards and costs (i....
[...]
...Initially, researchers focused on the justice of decision outcomes, termed distributive justice (Adams, 1965; Deutsch, 1975; Homans, 1961; Leventhal, 1976). Distributive justice is fostered where outcomes are consistent with implicit norms for allocation, such as equity or equality. More recent work has focused on the justice of the processes that lead to decision outcomes, termed procedural justice (Leventhal, 1980; Leventhal, Karuza, & Fry, 1980; Thibaut & Walker, 1975). Procedural justice is fostered through voice during a decision-making process or influence over the outcome (Thibaut & Walker, 1975) or by adherence to fair process criteria, such as consistency, lack of bias, correctability, representation, accuracy, and ethicality (Leventhal, 1980; Leventhal et al., 1980). Efforts to explain the impact of justice on effective organizational functioning have come under the rubric of organizational justice research (Greenberg, 1987, 1990b). Research integrating procedural and distributive justice has found consistent support for a two-factor conceptualization of organizational justice (Greenberg, 1990b). For example, Sweeney and McFarlin (1993) specified a structural equation model in which distributive justice...
[...]
..., Adams, 1965; Deutsch, 1975; Romans, 1961; Leventhal, 1976). Leventhal (1976) described the equity rule as "a single normative rule which dictates that rewards and resources be distributed in accordance with recipients' contributions" (p....
[...]
3,299 citations
3,298 citations
Cites background from "Inequity In Social Exchange"
...…consequences of social comparisons of outcomes have been addressed by relative deprivation theory (e.g., Crosby, 1976), equity theory (J. S. Adams, 1965; Walster et al., 1978), and the status-value formulation of equity theory (Berger, Cohen, & Zelditch, 1972; Berger, Fisek, Norman, &…...
[...]
References
16,927 citations
4,317 citations
1,103 citations
278 citations