scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Influence of organ site and tumor cell type on MUC1-specific tumor immunity.

TL;DR: It is shown that it is more difficult to produce immune responses to tumors growing at the pancreatic site than the s.c.C.Tg mice, and immune responses evoked by presentation of MUC1 in wild-type mice were effective in rejecting tumor cells in the pancreas of both wild- type and M UC1.
Abstract: We investigated the influence of organ-specific parameters on tolerance and immunity to human MUC1. C57Bl/6 mice (wild-type) and C57Bl/6 transgenic for MUC1 (MUC1.Tg) were challenged in the pancreas with Panc02-MUC1, a C57Bl/6-syngeneic pancreatic cancer cell line expressing human MUC1. Wild-type mice produced immune responses to MUC1 when presented on tumor cells growing in the pancreas; however, the responses to tumors in the pancreas were less effective than responses produced by tumor challenge at the s.c. site. Tumor immunity specific for MUC1 was produced in wild-type mice by two different procedures: (i) s.c. immunization of wild-type mice with a low dose of Panc02-MUC1 or (ii) adoptive transfer of spleen and lymph node cells harvested from wild-type mice previously immunized s.c. with Panc02-MUC1. This demonstrates that immune responses to MUC1 presented at the s.c. site can be detected and adoptively transferred. MUC1.Tg mice were immunologically tolerant to MUC1; however, some immunological protection against orthotopic challenge with Panc02-MUC1 was conferred by adoptive transfer of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from wild-type mice. These results show that it is more difficult to produce immune responses to tumors growing at the pancreatic site than the s.c. site. Panc02-MUC1 cells growing in the pancreas were accessible to the immune system, and immune responses evoked by s.c. presentation of this molecule in wild-type mice were effective in rejecting tumor cells in the pancreas of both wild-type and MUC1.Tg mice. No effective anti-tumor immune responses against MUC1 were produced in MUC1.Tg mice.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: Data suggest that endogenous expression of MUC1 protein by M UC1 transgenic mice induces T-cell tolerance to stimulation by MUC2, and will facilitate the investigation of anti-MUC1 immunotherapy formulations.
Abstract: The human epithelial mucin, MUC1, is a large transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed on most simple epithelia. It is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated on many human epithelial tumors, including more than 90% of human breast cancers. MUC1 is of interest as an immunotherapy target because patients with breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers have T lymphocytes in their tumor-draining lymph nodes that can be induced to recognize and lyse MUC1-expressing tumor cells. We have produced a transgenic mouse model that expresses the human MUC1 molecule on an inbred C57Bl/6 background to investigate the effect of endogenous expression of MUC1 on the ability of mice to generate antitumor immunity to MUC1-expressing tumors. Transgenic mice expressed the human transgene in a pattern and level consistent with that observed in humans. Transgenic mice were tolerant to stimulation by MUC1 as evidenced by the ability of MUC1-expressing tumor cells to grow in these mice, whereas MUC1-expressing cells were eliminated from wild-type mice. Moreover, transgenic mice immunized with MUC1 peptides failed to exhibit immunoglobulin class switching to the IgG subtypes. These data suggest that endogenous expression of MUC1 protein by MUC1 transgenic mice induces T-cell tolerance to stimulation by MUC1. The transgenic mice will provide a useful model to investigate the mechanisms that regulate immunological tolerance to tumor antigens and will facilitate the investigation of anti-MUC1 immunotherapy formulations.

193 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Miho Akimoto1, Mari Iizuka1, Rie Kanematsu1, Masato Yoshida1, Keizo Takenaga1 
11 May 2015-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that ginger extract has potent anticancer activity against pancreatic cancer cells by inducing ROS-mediated autosis and warrants further investigation in order to develop an efficacious candidate drug.
Abstract: The extract of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) and its major pungent components, [6]-shogaol and [6]-gingerol, have been shown to have an anti-proliferative effect on several tumor cell lines. However, the anticancer activity of the ginger extract in pancreatic cancer is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the ethanol-extracted materials of ginger suppressed cell cycle progression and consequently induced the death of human pancreatic cancer cell lines, including Panc-1 cells. The underlying mechanism entailed autosis, a recently characterized form of cell death, but not apoptosis or necroptosis. The extract markedly increased the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio, decreased SQSTM1/p62 protein, and enhanced vacuolization of the cytoplasm in Panc-1 cells. It activated AMPK, a positive regulator of autophagy, and inhibited mTOR, a negative autophagic regulator. The autophagy inhibitors 3-methyladenine and chloroquine partially prevented cell death. Morphologically, however, focal membrane rupture, nuclear shrinkage, focal swelling of the perinuclear space and electron dense mitochondria, which are unique morphological features of autosis, were observed. The extract enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and the antioxidant N-acetylcystein attenuated cell death. Our study revealed that daily intraperitoneal administration of the extract significantly prolonged survival (P = 0.0069) in a peritoneal dissemination model and suppressed tumor growth in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer (P < 0.01) without serious adverse effects. Although [6]-shogaol but not [6]-gingerol showed similar effects, chromatographic analyses suggested the presence of other constituent(s) as active substances. Together, these results show that ginger extract has potent anticancer activity against pancreatic cancer cells by inducing ROS-mediated autosis and warrants further investigation in order to develop an efficacious candidate drug.

125 citations


Additional excerpts

  • ...Panc02 cells were kindly provided by Dr. T. Hollingsworth, University of Nebraska Medical Center [19, 20]....

    [...]

  • ...Hollingsworth, University of Nebraska Medical Center [19, 20]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is indicated that prophylactic vaccination with dendritic/tumor fusion cells confers sufficient antitumor immunity to counter the tumorigenesis of potent oncogenic products.
Abstract: Genetically modified mice with spontaneous development of mammary carcinoma provide a powerful tool to study the efficacy of tumor vaccines, since they mimic breast cancer development in humans. We used a transgenic murine model expressing polyomavirus middle T oncogene and mucin 1 tumor-associated Ag to determine the preventive effect of a dendritic/tumor fusion cell vaccine. The MMT (a transgenic murine model) mice developed mammary carcinoma between the ages of 65-108 days with 100% penetrance. No spontaneous CTL were detected. However, prophylactic vaccination of MMT mice with dendritic/tumor fusion cells induced polyclonal CTL activity against spontaneous mammary carcinoma cells and rendered 57-61% of the mice free of the disease at the end of experiment (180 days). Furthermore, the level of CTL activity was maintained with multiple vaccinations. The antitumor immunity induced by vaccination with dendritic/tumor fusion cells reacted differently to injected tumor cells and autochthonous tumor. Whereas the injected tumor cells were rejected, the autochthonous tumor evaded the attack and was allowed to grow. Collectively these results indicate that prophylactic vaccination with dendritic/tumor fusion cells confers sufficient antitumor immunity to counter the tumorigenesis of potent oncogenic products. The findings in the present study are highly relevant to cancers in humans.

82 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results indicate that immunization with FC/MUC1 can generate an anti‐M UC1 response that is sufficient to delay the development of spontaneous mammary carcinomas and control tumour progression in MMT mice.
Abstract: Summary The tumour-associated antigen mucin 1 (MUC1) is a multifunctional protein involved in protection of mucous membranes, signal transduction, and modulation of the immune system. More than 70% of cancers overexpress MUC1, making MUC1 a potential target for immunotherapy. In the present study, MUC1 transgenic mice were crossed with syngeneic strains that express the polyomavirus middle-T oncogene (PyMT) driven by the mouse mammary tumour virus promoter long-terminal repeat (MMTV-LTR). The resultant breed (MMT mice) developed spontaneous MUC1-expressing mammary carcinomas with 100% penetrance at 8–15 weeks of age. As found in human breast cancer, the mammary carcinoma in MMT mice arose in multiple stages. Immunization with fusions of dendritic cells and MUC1-positive tumour cells (FC/MUC1) induced MUC1-specific immune responses that blocked or delayed the development of spontaneous breast carcinomas. In contrast, there was no delay of tumour development in MMT mice immunized with irradiated MC38/MUC1 tumour cells. The efficacy of fusion cells was closely correlated with the timing of initial immunization. Immunization with FC/MUC1 initiated in MMT mice at < 1, 1–2 and 2–3 months of age rendered 33, 5 and 0% of mice free of tumour, respectively, up to 6 months. Whereas mice immunized in the later stage of tumour development succumbed to their disease, immunization resulted in control of tumour progression and prolongation of life. These results indicate that immunization with FC/MUC1 can generate an anti-MUC1 response that is sufficient to delay the development of spontaneous mammary carcinomas and control tumour progression in MMT mice.

70 citations

References
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: Present and future strategies for treatment include the addition of neoadjuvant regimens and adjuvant modalities including intraoperative radiation, photodynamic therapy, intraperitoneal therapies, and pancreatic and splanchnic perfusion.
Abstract: Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has an incidence of only 0.01%, yet is the fourth leading cause of cancer death for American men and women. Despite this dismal outlook, new strategies for staging and therapy for pancreatic cancer have emerged over the last few years. Laparoscopy with cytologic evaluation of peritoneal washings, and more recently, although still investigational, endoscopic and intracorporeal ultrasonography have provided more detailed staging information. The result of improved staging is earlier, more accurate selection of treatment most appropriate for stage of disease. For those patients with clinically localized disease, laparotomy with an attempt at resection is indicated, particularly with the recent trend in declining morbidity and operative mortality the recent trend in declining morbidity and operative mortality associated with pancreatectomy. With clinically unresectable disease, patients may potentially be spared the morbidity of laparotomy. Advances in therapeutic endoscopic and percutaneous manipulation of the obstructed biliary tree have provided an alternative to surgery and improved quality of life for patients with abbreviated life spans. Gastroduodenal obstruction has traditionally been managed by laparotomy, although with improved technology and surgical skill, a laparoscopic approach may become standard. Because even at presentation pancreatic cancer is rarely a localized process but is a disseminated disease, surgery alone is unlikely to increase survival rates in the absence of adjuvant therapies. Present and future strategies for treatment include the addition of neoadjuvant regimens and adjuvant modalities including intraoperative radiation, photodynamic therapy, intraperitoneal therapies, and pancreatic and splanchnic perfusion. Clearly, the greatest strides in treatment of pancreatic cancer will come with development of new agents with significantly greater antitumor efficacy.

32 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ability to alter theimmune response towards cellular immunity with mannan or to humoral immunity with peptides, allows the immune response to be selectively manipulated.

31 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results show that the growth properties and immunological rejection of pancreatic tumors is affected by the organ site at which the tumor grows.
Abstract: We established a model of orthotopic injection of a syngeneic pancreatic tumor cell line in C57BL/6 mice and evaluated the effects of organ site on induction of immunity to a tumor-specific antigen, MUC1. Mice were challenged with a syngeneic pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line that expressed MUC1 (Panc02-MUC1) by orthotopic injection into the pancreas, or by subcutaneous injection. Tumor cells injected into the pancreas grew much faster than those injected subcutaneously. Mice challenged subcutaneously with Panc02-MUC1 rejected tumors or developed slowly growing tumors that were negative for MUC1 expression. In contrast, mice challenged orthotopically into the pancreas developed progressive tumors that were positive for MUC1 expression. Sera from mice that rejected PancO2-MUC1 (tumor-immune mice) showed no detectable IgG1 and IgM titers against the MUC1 tandem-repeat peptide, whereas mice with progressive tumor growth had significant titers of IgG1 and IgM specific for MUC1. This suggests that the humoral immune response was ineffective in mediating tumor rejection. The results show that the growth properties and immunological rejection of pancreatic tumors is affected by the organ site at which the tumor grows.

27 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A Phase I trial evaluating the safety and the induction of immune responses in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was reported in this paper. But, no evidence of autoimmune disease was observed.

14 citations

Related Papers (5)