Search or ask a question
Pricing
Login
Sign up
Home
Notebook
BETA
Literature Review
Copilot
Citation generator
Paraphraser
AI Detector
Chrome Extension
Talk with us
Use on ChatGPT
All figures (11)
Fig 11.-Evolution of objective function characterizing the error between model and well measurements with the number of simulations
Fig 12.-Evolution of the bottom-hole pressure at the injection well HI during the CO2-brine injection period
Table 1 Operating parameters for 8 hours of CO2 injection in flow control mode (2 kg/sec)
Fig 6.-Evolution of BHT and WHT during 24 hours of CO2 injection in pressure control mode
Fig 10.- CO2-brine relative permeability in the fracture [Le Gallo et al., 2017]and end-points used in history-matching
Fig 16.- Vertical cross-section of the time-evolution of temperature in the fracture around the injection well HI during the two phase CO2-brine injection periods
Table 2 Operating parameters for 24 hours of CO2 injection in pressure control mode
Fig 4.- Evolution of operating parameters for 24 hours of CO2 injection in pressure control mode
Fig 15.- Vertical cross-section of the time-evolution of CO2 saturation in the fracture around the injection well HI during the two phase CO2-brine injection periods
Fig 7.-Evolution of objective function characterizing the error between model and well measurements with the number of simulations
Fig 5.- Thermal profile of HI well tubing previously (top) and during CO2 injection (bottom)
Posted Content
•
DOI
•
Innovative CO 2 Injections in Carbonates and Advanced Modelling for Numerical Investigation
[...]
de Dios Jc
,
Le Gallo Y
,
Marín Ja
27 Jul 2018
-