Integrated CMOS sensor technologies for the CLIC tracker
Summary (2 min read)
1 Introduction
- To perform highly precise physics measurements, a single point resolution of 7µm and a material budget of 1 2%X0 per layer need to be reached in the large area tracker detector.
- Integrated technologies are promising candidates in view of large-scale production and low material budget.
- Test beam campaigns to study the Investigator High Resistivity (HR) CMOS test chip have been performed at the CERN SPS with a 120GeV pion beam.
- As a reference system, the CLICdp Timepix3 telescope has been used, providing an excellent tracking and timing resolution on the Device Under Test (DUT) plane of ⇠ 2µm and 1 ns, respectively [6].
2 The Investigator chip
- Within the ALICE ITS upgrade project, a fully monolithic chip, the ALPIDE [7], has been developed in a 180 nm High Resistivity (HR) CMOS process .
- Using the same process, the Investigator test-chip has been developed [8, 9].
- Various pixel layouts are implemented in di↵erent mini-matrices with 8 ⇥ 8 pixels, to study the impact of the pixel layout on the performance.
- The standard process has been modified, inserting an additional n-layer to create a deep planar pn-junction and achieve full lateral depletion of the sensor.
- The output bu↵ers are read out by external ADCs, sampling the individual pixel response with a frequency of 65MHz [9].
3 Test beam data taking and reconstruction
- During the analysis, a threshold is applied on single pixel level.
- Since this threshold is lower than the seed threshold during data taking, it is referred to as the neighbour threshold.
- Adjacent pixels with a signal larger than the neighbour threshold are combined to a cluster; and the position is reconstructed by linear charge interpolation and ⌘-correction.
- The distance between the predicted track position on the Investigator and the reconstructed hit position is required to be within 100µm.
- Moreover, tracks passing through the outer half of the edge pixels are discarded to avoid e.g. e↵ects from the finite track prediction resolution.
4 Test-beam results
- To explore the charge collection of the modified process in detail, results are projected onto the predicted track position within individual pixel cells (in-pixel presentation).
- Figure 5 shows the mean cluster size, defined as the number of pixels in a cluster above threshold.
- The charge is shared most likely to one neighbour at the pixel edges, and to more than one neighbour at the pixel corners.
- A global e ciency higher than 99% and a spatial and timing resolution with respect to the reference tracks of ⇠ 6µm and ⇠ 5 ns, respectively, have been measured.
- Even though the measured timing resolution is limited by the ADC sampling frequency and the rise time of the output bu↵er, the results are well within the requirements for the CLIC tracker.
5 Simulation
- A simulation chain using GEANT4 [11] to model the energy deposit in the sensor, a 2-dimensional Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) [12] simulation to model the device and perform a transient simulation of the charge collection, and a parametric model to simulate energy fluctuations and to perform the position reconstruction has been developed [13].
- The electrostatic potential from the TCAD simulation is shown in Figure 7 and 8, respectively for the standard and modified process.
- As indicated by the white lines, the depletion for the standard process does extend over the full lateral size of the pixel, whereas the expected full lateral depletion can be observed for the modified process.
- Results are compared between simulation and data in Figure 9 - 11.
- For the modified process, an excellent agreement can be observed between simulation and data in the residual distribution in Figure 10, as well as in the resolution, defined as the Root Mean Square (RMS) of the residual distribution, for di↵erent neighbour thresholds in Figure 11.
6 Summary
- The ALICE HR CMOS Investigator test chip has been explored in detail by in-pixel test beam studies and a simulation based on GEANT4 and TCAD.
- The simulation results reproduce the test beam measurements, showing a good understanding of the technology.
- The measured performance indicates the suitability of the technology for the CLIC tracker and the presented studies are used in a next R&D phase as input for the design of a fully integrated chip for the CLIC tracker.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
References
27 citations
"Integrated CMOS sensor technologies..." refers methods in this paper
...As a reference system, the CLICdp Timepix3 telescope has been used, providing an excellent tracking and timing resolution on the Device Under Test (DUT) plane of ⇠ 2μm and 1 ns, respectively [6]....
[...]
16 citations
4 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. How many tests have been performed at the CERN SPS?
Test beam campaigns to study the Investigator High Resistivity (HR) CMOS test chip have been performed at the CERN SPS with a 120GeV pion beam.
Q3. What is the eciency of the cluster?
Adjacent pixels with a signal larger than the neighbour threshold are combined to a cluster; and the position is reconstructed by linear charge interpolation and ⌘-correction.
Q4. How much material budget is needed to perform physics measurements?
To perform highly precise physics measurements, a single point resolution of 7µm and a material budget of 1 2%X0 per layer need to be reached in the large area tracker detector.
Q5. How is the eciency of the Investigator chip measured?
An e ciency of > 99% and a spatial and timing resolution of 6µm and 5 ns, respectively, have been measured, using a mini-matrix with a pitch of 28µm and a bias voltage of 6V.
Q6. What is the purpose of the paper?
In a next phase of R&D the results on the Investigator test chip will be used to optimise the pixel layout for a fully integrated chip for the CLIC tracker.
Q7. What is the purpose of the Investigator test chip?
A simulation chain using GEANT4 [11] to model the energy deposit in the sensor, a 2-dimensional Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) [12] simulation to model the device and perform a transient simulation of the charge collection, and a parametric model to simulate energy fluctuations and to perform the position reconstruction has been developed [13].
Q8. What is the effect of charge sharing on the signal distribution of a cluster?
As shown in Figure 6, the impact of charge sharing is also reflected in the distribution of the highest pixel signal (seed signal) in a cluster: the more charge is shared between the pixels, the lower the seed signal.
Q9. What is the output of the source follower of each individual pixel?
The output of the source follower of each individual pixel is connected to a dedicated output bu↵er with a rise time of ⇠ 10 ns.2 P-P++ backsideDeep P-wellN-well P-MOSN-MOSFig.
Q10. How is the distance between the predicted track position and the reconstructed hit position required?
The distance between the predicted track position on the Investigator and the reconstructed hit position is required to be within 100µm.
Q11. What is the expected depletion for the standard process?
As indicated by the white lines, the depletion for the standard process does extend over the full lateral size of the pixel, whereas the expected full lateral depletion can be observed for the modified process.
Q12. What is the timing resolution of the CLIC tracker?
Even though the measured timing resolution is limited by the ADC sampling frequency and the rise time of the output bu↵er, the results are well within the requirements for the CLIC tracker.