Abstract: iberalisation, privatisation and independent regulation of utilities were popularised by the UK and Chile in the 1980s. By then the United States already had long experience of private provision and public regulation of utility services, and independent power production had been mandated by the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act 1978 (PURPA). Many countries have subsequently adopted some or all of these policies. Competition has been introduced in telecommunications, in electricity production and in the supply of electricity and natural gas to large users. Franchise competition exists in water supply and in some rail systems. Yardstick or comparative competition is used by regulators in industries where there are regional monopolies with national regulation. At the same time direct competition in the provision of network services has usually not been on the agenda, except in the telecommunications industry. Whether there should be direct product market competition in retail electricity and gas supply, in water and sanitation, in rail and post are all controversial issues. The main message of the paper is that competition can and should be introduced in many parts of utilities’ operations, but that competition is not a panacea and it requires supporting regulation and institutions if it is to work well. Introducing competition into a regulated and monopolised industry requires both imagination and care, and often entails costs which need to be balanced against the expected benefits of competition. It is important for policymakers to remember that competition is not an objective but is an instrument for achieving ultimate goals. The structure of the paper is as follows. The next section covers the general arguments in favour of competition. The costs of having various types of competition in regulated industries are then covered. This is followed by discussion of the parts of utilities where competition generally works well and where competition is of doubtful value. The interaction between regulation and competition is then considered. The penultimate section assesses the experience of competition in Californian electricity and a number of industries in the UK and conclusions are drawn.