scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Introducing a global ranking of optometrists by research impact.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the impact of Australia-trained optometrists on the performance of Australia trained optometrs is investigated. But this is not a ranking of optometrators.
Abstract
I have previously undertaken and published bibliometric analyses documenting the impact of Australia-trained optometrists,1,2 and have long harboured a desire to extend this to a ranking of optomet...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring the bibliometrics of various ophthalmic fields

TL;DR: Optometric researchers generally work and publish in specific fields that outwardly define their research interests, and occasionally foray into different fields as mentioned in this paper. But, some spread their interests more e...
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output

TL;DR: The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number ≥h, is proposed as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher.
Journal ArticleDOI

Citation analysis of Australia-trained optometrists

TL;DR: In this paper, the Google Scholar database and Publish or Perish software are used to generate citation metrics of Australia-trained optometrists, and they conclude that this analysis has considerable utility in defining and contextualising the general landscape of Australian academic publishing in a national and international framework.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global optometrist top 200 research ranking

TL;DR: The primary evidence for which is publications in refereed scientific journals is a rigorous research base, which is underpinned by a rigorous clinical optometric practice as discussed by the authors, which is the primary evidence which is used for clinical optometrists who...
Journal ArticleDOI

Citation re-analysis of Australia-trained optometrists: 10 years on.

TL;DR: Who are the researchers that have been ‘leading the charge’ in Australian optometric research, and how can these individuals be identified and ranked?