Laboratory and Modeling Evaluations in Support of Field Testing for Desiccation at the Hanford Site
Summary (2 min read)
Introduction
- Laboratory and modeling efforts were conducted to investigate technical uncertainties related to the desiccation process and its impact on contaminant transport.
- The experimental results also suggest that for slowly moving desiccation fronts and high solute concentrations (>100 g/L), some redistribution of solute may occur in the soil moisture and in the direction of the solute concentration gradient.
- This report documents the modeling and laboratory results pertinent to these elements conducted in support of evaluating desiccation and planning for a field test.
2.1 Effect of Evaporative Cooling and Simple Heterogeneities on Desiccation
- Soil desiccation , involving water evaporation induced by air injection and extraction, is a potentially robust vadose zone remediation process to limit migration of inorganic or radionuclide contaminants through the vadose zone.
- A series of detailed, intermediate-scale laboratory experiments, using unsaturated homogeneous and heterogeneous systems, were conducted to improve understanding of energy balance issues related to soil desiccation.
- The fine-grained sand embedded in the medium-grained sand of the heterogeneous system showed two local temperature minima associated with the cooling.
- Results of the laboratory tests were simulated accurately only if the thermal properties of the flow cell walls and insulation material were taken into account, indicating that the appropriate physics were incorporated into the simulator.
- Details of these laboratory experiments are reported in Oostrom et al. (2009).
2.2 Solute Transport
- Experiments were conducted to examine the impact of solute concentration on the desiccation process.
- Results suggest that desiccation rate is not a function of solute concentration.
- The experimental results also suggest that for slowly moving desiccation fronts and high solute concentrations (>100 g/L), some redistribution of solute may occur in the soil moisture and in the direction of the solute concentration gradient.
- Because the sediment is relatively dry behind the desiccation front, solute migration will occur in the direction of the desiccation front movement or laterally at the edges of the desiccated area.
- Maximum concentration factors of about 120% of the initial concentration were observed in the onedimensional column experiments.
2.2.1 Description of Experiments
- A series of one-dimensional column experiments were conducted to evaluate the movement of NaNO3 salt during desiccation.
- All experiments were conducted in the vertical direction.
- To verify that assumption, two experiments were conducted for each porous material in which fluids in the packed column were allowed to redistribute for 2 weeks.
- The average desiccation rate for each column was computed by dividing the distance from the upper to lower humidity probe (90 cm) divided by the difference in arrival time of the drying fronts at these locations.
2.2.2 Results of Experiments with 40/50-Mesh Sand
- Results shown in Figures 2.1 and 2.2 demonstrate that water and salt do not migrate during a 14-day redistribution period.
- The results show that for the experiments with initial salt concentrations of 1 and 10 g/L, no preferential salt movement could be observed.
- A clear trend in the concentrations was obvious for the experiments conducted with 100 and 500 g/L salt.
- For the 100 g/L experiment, the dimensionless concentration ranged from 0.95 at the inlet to 1.02 at the outlet.
2.2.3 Experiments with 70-Mesh Sand
- Results shown in Figures 2.6 and 2.7 demonstrate that water and salt do not migrate during a 14-day redistribution period for this particular sand, although the added volume per Kg of sand is 50 mL. 2.8 A comparison of the desiccation experiments with a rate of 1 L/min are shown in Figure 2.8.
- An increase in the salt concentrations with distance from the inlet is observed for the experiments conducted with 100 and 500 g/L salt.
- For both experiments, the range is about the same as for the experiments in the 40/50 sand.
- As for the 40/50 sand, the salt concentration ranges were smaller for the higher rate than for the lower rate .
2.2.4 Experiments with Hanford Site Sand
- Results shown in Figures 2.10 and 2.11 demonstrate that water and salt do not migrate during a 14-day redistribution period for the Hanford Site sand.
- The water saturations for both experiments after 14 days are near the initial 0.28 .
- As for the experiments with the 40/50 and 70 laboratory sands, results show for the initial salt concentrations of 1 and 10 g/L, no preferential salt movement occurred.
- An obvious increase in salt 2.10 concentrations with distance from the inlet is observed for the experiments conducted with 100 and 500 g/L salt.
- The data in Table 2.3 show that for the Hanford Site sand experiments, the desiccation rate is not affected by the initial salt concentration.
2.2.5 Conclusions
- Experiments reported herein examined the impact of salt concentration on the desiccation process.
- Because the sediment is relatively dry behind the desiccation front, solute migration will occur in the direction of the desiccation front movement or laterally at the edges of the desiccated area.
- Maximum concentration factors of about 120% of the initial concentration were observed in the one-dimensional column experiments.
- This moderate concentration increase does not affect the desiccation process because the desiccation rate is independent of the salt concentration.
- The impact of the solute concentration front on rewetting and over larger distances in the subsurface still needs to be investigated.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
7 citations
Cites background or methods from "Laboratory and Modeling Evaluations..."
...The BC Cribs and Trenches site has been the focus of vadose zone investigations (e.g., Ward et al. 2004; Truex et al. 2011b, 2012)....
[...]
...This approach supports consideration of active remedies to augment natural attenuation within the context of the recognized “enhanced attenuation” approach (ITRC 2010; Truex et al. 2011a)....
[...]
...These processes are essentially the same as those presented and described in detail in the EPA technical protocol for MNA of inorganic contaminants in groundwater (EPA 2007a, 2007b, 2010; ITRC 2010) and described with respect to conceptual site models by Truex et al. (2011a)....
[...]
...As such, the existing MNA guidance, including the EPA and Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC) protocols (EPA 2007a, 2007b, 2010; ITRC 2010) and the Scenarios document (Truex et al. 2011a), discuss these processes in detail....
[...]
6 citations
Cites background from "Laboratory and Modeling Evaluations..."
...After desiccation, the flux rate of water and contaminants toward groundwater is reduced, as shown in laboratory and field studies (Oostrom et al., 2009; Truex et al., 2011, 2012, 2018)....
[...]
...Soil desiccation has also been demonstrated to be effective at creating dry conditions at the USDOE Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State, where moisture content and contaminant flux were lowered to near zero (Oostrom et al., 2009; Truex et al., 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018; Zhang, 2016)....
[...]
5 citations
4 citations
3 citations
Cites background or methods from "Laboratory and Modeling Evaluations..."
...2011), modeling studies (Ward et al. 2008; Truex et al. 2011), and field testing (Truex et al....
[...]
...Soil desiccation was investigated as a potential vadose zone remediation technology, including laboratory studies (Ward et al. 2008; Oostrom et al. 2009 2012a,b; Truex et al. 2011), modeling studies (Ward et al....
[...]
...Desiccation of a portion of the vadose zone, in conjunction with a surface infiltration barrier, has the potential of minimizing migration of deep vadose zone contaminants towards the water table (Truex et al. 2011)....
[...]
...Evaporation can remove pore water and result in very low moisture content in the desiccated zone (Ward et al. 2008; Oostrom et al. 2009; Truex et al. 2011)....
[...]