Laboratory and Modeling Evaluations in Support of Field Testing for Desiccation at the Hanford Site
Summary (2 min read)
Introduction
- Laboratory and modeling efforts were conducted to investigate technical uncertainties related to the desiccation process and its impact on contaminant transport.
- The experimental results also suggest that for slowly moving desiccation fronts and high solute concentrations (>100 g/L), some redistribution of solute may occur in the soil moisture and in the direction of the solute concentration gradient.
- This report documents the modeling and laboratory results pertinent to these elements conducted in support of evaluating desiccation and planning for a field test.
2.1 Effect of Evaporative Cooling and Simple Heterogeneities on Desiccation
- Soil desiccation , involving water evaporation induced by air injection and extraction, is a potentially robust vadose zone remediation process to limit migration of inorganic or radionuclide contaminants through the vadose zone.
- A series of detailed, intermediate-scale laboratory experiments, using unsaturated homogeneous and heterogeneous systems, were conducted to improve understanding of energy balance issues related to soil desiccation.
- The fine-grained sand embedded in the medium-grained sand of the heterogeneous system showed two local temperature minima associated with the cooling.
- Results of the laboratory tests were simulated accurately only if the thermal properties of the flow cell walls and insulation material were taken into account, indicating that the appropriate physics were incorporated into the simulator.
- Details of these laboratory experiments are reported in Oostrom et al. (2009).
2.2 Solute Transport
- Experiments were conducted to examine the impact of solute concentration on the desiccation process.
- Results suggest that desiccation rate is not a function of solute concentration.
- The experimental results also suggest that for slowly moving desiccation fronts and high solute concentrations (>100 g/L), some redistribution of solute may occur in the soil moisture and in the direction of the solute concentration gradient.
- Because the sediment is relatively dry behind the desiccation front, solute migration will occur in the direction of the desiccation front movement or laterally at the edges of the desiccated area.
- Maximum concentration factors of about 120% of the initial concentration were observed in the onedimensional column experiments.
2.2.1 Description of Experiments
- A series of one-dimensional column experiments were conducted to evaluate the movement of NaNO3 salt during desiccation.
- All experiments were conducted in the vertical direction.
- To verify that assumption, two experiments were conducted for each porous material in which fluids in the packed column were allowed to redistribute for 2 weeks.
- The average desiccation rate for each column was computed by dividing the distance from the upper to lower humidity probe (90 cm) divided by the difference in arrival time of the drying fronts at these locations.
2.2.2 Results of Experiments with 40/50-Mesh Sand
- Results shown in Figures 2.1 and 2.2 demonstrate that water and salt do not migrate during a 14-day redistribution period.
- The results show that for the experiments with initial salt concentrations of 1 and 10 g/L, no preferential salt movement could be observed.
- A clear trend in the concentrations was obvious for the experiments conducted with 100 and 500 g/L salt.
- For the 100 g/L experiment, the dimensionless concentration ranged from 0.95 at the inlet to 1.02 at the outlet.
2.2.3 Experiments with 70-Mesh Sand
- Results shown in Figures 2.6 and 2.7 demonstrate that water and salt do not migrate during a 14-day redistribution period for this particular sand, although the added volume per Kg of sand is 50 mL. 2.8 A comparison of the desiccation experiments with a rate of 1 L/min are shown in Figure 2.8.
- An increase in the salt concentrations with distance from the inlet is observed for the experiments conducted with 100 and 500 g/L salt.
- For both experiments, the range is about the same as for the experiments in the 40/50 sand.
- As for the 40/50 sand, the salt concentration ranges were smaller for the higher rate than for the lower rate .
2.2.4 Experiments with Hanford Site Sand
- Results shown in Figures 2.10 and 2.11 demonstrate that water and salt do not migrate during a 14-day redistribution period for the Hanford Site sand.
- The water saturations for both experiments after 14 days are near the initial 0.28 .
- As for the experiments with the 40/50 and 70 laboratory sands, results show for the initial salt concentrations of 1 and 10 g/L, no preferential salt movement occurred.
- An obvious increase in salt 2.10 concentrations with distance from the inlet is observed for the experiments conducted with 100 and 500 g/L salt.
- The data in Table 2.3 show that for the Hanford Site sand experiments, the desiccation rate is not affected by the initial salt concentration.
2.2.5 Conclusions
- Experiments reported herein examined the impact of salt concentration on the desiccation process.
- Because the sediment is relatively dry behind the desiccation front, solute migration will occur in the direction of the desiccation front movement or laterally at the edges of the desiccated area.
- Maximum concentration factors of about 120% of the initial concentration were observed in the one-dimensional column experiments.
- This moderate concentration increase does not affect the desiccation process because the desiccation rate is independent of the salt concentration.
- The impact of the solute concentration front on rewetting and over larger distances in the subsurface still needs to be investigated.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
2 citations
Cites background from "Laboratory and Modeling Evaluations..."
...…the same as those presented and described in detail in the U.S. Environmental Agency’s technical protocol for monitored natural attenuation of inorganic contaminants in groundwater (EPA 2007a,b, 2010; ITRC 2010) and described with respect to conceptual site models by Truex et al. (2011)....
[...]
Additional excerpts
...The technology currently under evaluation is soil desiccation, an approach that minimizes Tc-99 movement in the vadose zone by removing pore water via the injection of dry air and extraction of water vapor [8]....
[...]
Cites background or methods from "Laboratory and Modeling Evaluations..."
...Desiccation of a portion of the vadose zone, in conjunction with a surface infiltration barrier, has the potential to minimize migration of deep vadose zone contaminants towards the water table (Truex et al. 2011)....
[...]
...In the laboratory, desiccation was shown to be capable of reducing the moisture content to below the residual moisture content of the porous medium (Truex et al. 2011; Ward et al. 2008; Oostrom et al. 2009)....
[...]
...Truex et al. (2011) examined rewetting of desiccated zones in the laboratory and found that vapor-phase rewetting from adjacent humid soil gas, in the absence of advective soil gas movement, occurs slowly by diffusion of water vapor and increases the moisture content of desiccated porous medium to…...
[...]
...Laboratory and modeling studies have been conducted to study desiccation and provide a technical basis for its use as a potential remedy (Truex et al. 2011; Ward et al. 2008; Oostrom et al. 2009, 2011, 2012a and b)....
[...]
...Evaporation can remove pore water and may result in very low moisture contents and decreased water relative permeability in the desiccated zone (Ward et al. 2008; Oostrom et al. 2009, 2012a and b; Truex et al. 2011, 2012a and b, 2013a and b, 2014)....
[...]