Landscape response to tectonic forcing: Digital elevation model analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California
Citations
967 citations
Cites background or methods or result from "Landscape response to tectonic forc..."
...We select regression bounds on a case by case basis, rather than simply adhering to the common set of regression limits (0.1 km2–5 km2) used by Snyder et al. (2000)....
[...]
...Reference concavities typically fall in the range of 0.35–0.65 (Snyder et al., 2000; Kirby and Whipple, 2001; Brocklehurst and Whipple, 2002; Kirby et al., 2003; Wobus et al., 2003)....
[...]
...The two principal conclusions of Snyder et al. (2000) are upheld in this reanalysis: (1) channel steepness increases by a factor of ~1.8 between the low and high uplift rate zones, and (2) there is no statistically significant difference in the concavity index between channels in the low and high…...
[...]
...Our data handling methods have been refined and improved over the years since our initial efforts in stream profile analysis (Snyder et al., 2000)....
[...]
...Because k s is a function of U, how- ever (see below, and Snyder et al., 2000; Kirby and Whipple, 2001; Kirby et al., 2003), a downstream change in rock uplift rate may be manifested as a change in profile concavity (e.g., Kirby and Whipple, 2001)....
[...]
956 citations
Cites background or result from "Landscape response to tectonic forc..."
...…of river incision model parameters (Howard & Kerby 1983; Seidl & Dietrich 1992; Rosenbloom & Anderson 1994; Seidl et al. 1994; Stock & Montgomery 1999; Snyder et al. 2000, 2003a,b; Whipple et al. 2000b; Kirby & Whipple 2001; Lave & Avouac 2001; Tomkin et al. 2003; van der Beek & Bishop 2003)....
[...]
...For instance, in the small coastal streams studied by Snyder et al. (2000, 2003a), erosional morphologies indicate removal of joint blocks as the dominant incision mechanism, but, as confirmed by simple field experimentation, impacts by coarse bedload particles are clearly capable of dislodging…...
[...]
...…point where fully alluvial conditions prevail, depending on the study) varies widely from 0.3–1.2 (e.g., Tarboton et al. 1989, Sklar & Dietrich 1998, Snyder et al. 2000, Kirby & Whipple 2001, Brocklehurst & Whipple 2002, Tucker & Whipple 2002, Kirby et al. 2003, VanLaningham 2003; L.M. Schoenbohm,…...
[...]
...For instance, in both the Clearwater River studied by Pazzaglia & Brandon (2001) and the small coastal streams of the King Range studied by Snyder et al. (2000, 2003a), higher uplift rates are associated with greater exposure of bedrock and more frequent bedrock steps, but in each case there are…...
[...]
...…strong lithologic contrasts can produce differences in channel steepness index comparable to those associated with large gradients in rock uplift rate (Snyder et al. 2000, Duvall et al. 2003, Stock & Dietrich 2003, van der Beek & Bishop 2003; A. Duvall, E. Kirby & D. Burbank, manuscript in review)....
[...]
742 citations
726 citations
Cites background from "Landscape response to tectonic forc..."
...All regressions excluded data from hillslopes (Montgomery and Foufoula-Georgiou, 1993; Snyder et al., 2000) and from alluviated sections of the channels on either side of the anticline....
[...]
722 citations
References
2,252 citations
"Landscape response to tectonic forc..." refers background in this paper
...…Q = k q A c , (3) where A is upstream drainage area, k q is a dimensional coefficient, and c is a positive constant, the value of which is approximately unity or slightly less (Dunne and Leopold, 1978; Pazzaglia et al., 1998), particularly for small, steep drainages, such as those studied here....
[...]
1,924 citations
1,889 citations
"Landscape response to tectonic forc..." refers background in this paper
...…the local stream-bed morphology varies from cobble to sand plane bed near the mouths of the larger drainages to a locally variable mix of step-pool, boulder-cascade , bedrock, and colluvial conditions in the higher parts of the basins (classification scheme of Montgomery and Buffington, 1997)....
[...]
1,850 citations
"Landscape response to tectonic forc..." refers background in this paper
...In general , we anticipate that the high-flow width most likely represents the geomorphically significant flow condition (Wolman and Miller, 1960)....
[...]
...…for basal shear stress (τ b ) is obtained: , (2) where ρ is density of water, C f is a dimensionless friction factor, g is gravitational acceleration, S is local channel slope (dz/dx), Q is a characteristic stream discharge (Wolman and Miller, 1960), and W is a characteristic channel width....
[...]
1,805 citations
"Landscape response to tectonic forc..." refers background or result in this paper
...Whipple and Tucker (1999) show that the value of n exerts strong control on equilibrium channel slope, equilibrium topographic relief, transient profile form, and response time scale....
[...]
...…similar unit stream-power) model, in which incision rate is given by a power function of drainage area and channel slope (e.g., Howard and Kerby, 1983; Seidl and Dietrich, 1992; Anderson, 1994; Howard, 1994; Moglen and Bras, 1995; Tucker, 1996; Stock and Montgomery, 1999; Whipple and Tucker, 1999)....
[...]
...Whipple and Tucker (1999) derived an expression for channel response time to changes in rock-uplift rate....
[...]
...However, the mean value is consistent with both the theoretical prediction that m/n should depend only on the exponents b and c (equations 9 and 13) (Whipple and Tucker, 1999 ) and the equilibrium channel hypothesis....
[...]
...This observation is consistent with a prediction of the shear-stress incision model (equations 9 and 13; Whipple and Tucker, 1999), and has important implications for possible downstream variation of the erosion coefficient, and the style of channel response to changes in uplift rate....
[...]