Large scale bias and the peak background split
Citations
10,650 citations
Cites methods from "Large scale bias and the peak backg..."
...We can evaluate this effect by first computing the fraction of collapsed objects, fDM , at a given redshift: fDM (z) = 1 ρ0 ∫ ∞ Mmin Φ(M, z)MdM, (2) where Φ(M, z) is the Sheth & Tormen (1999) mass function....
[...]
3,674 citations
Cites methods from "Large scale bias and the peak backg..."
...To obtain the comoving number density of halos per logarithmic interval in the virial mass, and the linear bias, they use the Sheth-Tormen method [1137], while they use the Navarro-Frenk-White [946] form for halo profiles....
[...]
[...]
3,375 citations
Cites methods from "Large scale bias and the peak backg..."
...The Sheth–Tormen mass function [535] and the Navarro–Frenk–White halo profile [449] are usually employed in GR....
[...]
2,072 citations
Cites background or methods from "Large scale bias and the peak backg..."
...As studies over many years have shown with increasing accuracy (Press & Schechter 1974; Sheth & Tormen 1999; Jenkins et al. 2001), the halo mass function appears to depend only on the dimensionless fluctuation amplitude ν ≡ δc/σ (R, t), (52) where δc is a constant of the order of unity, usually…...
[...]
...…2000; Seljak 2000; Scoccimarro et al. 2001) resurrected the Neyman–Scott model with a modern mass function for dark haloes (Press & Schechter 1974; Sheth & Tormen 1999; Jenkins et al. 2001), plus realistic density profiles (Navarro, Frenk & White 1996, 1997; Moore et al. 1999), and a…...
[...]
...In terms of the halo model, if one assumes = 0.4 in accord with Sheth & Tormen (1999), then a strong dependence of β0 on n is required in order to match the measured data....
[...]
...Prescriptions for this clustering were given by Mo & White (1996), Mo, Jing & White (1997b), Sheth & Lemson (1999), Sheth & Tormen (1999), Sheth, Mo & Tormen (2000), and a recent example of their effectiveness is shown clearly in Colberg et al. (2000)....
[...]
2,012 citations
Cites methods from "Large scale bias and the peak backg..."
...In Figure 6 we present the differential halo mass functions of Illustris-1 and Illustris-Dark-1 along with empirical fitting formulae (Sheth & Tormen 1999; Jenkins et al. 2001; Warren et al. 2006)....
[...]
References
4,741 citations
"Large scale bias and the peak backg..." refers background in this paper
...The shape of the unconditional mass function is expected to depend on the initial fluctuation distribution (e.g. Press & Schechter 1974)....
[...]
...There has been considerable interest recently in developing models for the shape and evolution of the mass function of collapsed dark matter haloes (Press & Schechter 1974; Bond et al. 1991; Lacey & Cole 1993) as well as for the evolution of the spatial distribution of these haloes (Mo & White…...
[...]
3,098 citations
2,159 citations
1,826 citations
"Large scale bias and the peak backg..." refers background or methods in this paper
...…interest recently in developing models for the shape and evolution of the mass function of collapsed dark matter haloes (Press & Schechter 1974; Bond et al. 1991; Lacey & Cole 1993) as well as for the evolution of the spatial distribution of these haloes (Mo & White 1996; Catelan et al. 1997;…...
[...]
...Bond et al. (1991) used a random walk barrier crossing model to derive the Press–Schechter unconditional mass function from the statistics of the initial fluctuation field....
[...]
...Then, for initially scale free spectra in models with Ω0 = 1 and Λ0 = 0, ν f(ν) ≡ m2 n(m, z) ρ̄ d log m d log ν (9) has a universal shape (Press–Schechter 1974; Peebles 1980; Bond et al. 1991)....
[...]
1,555 citations
"Large scale bias and the peak backg..." refers background or methods in this paper
...(7) Furthermore, Mo & White (1996) argued that one can write 〈 ( δEh )2 〉 V ≈ b2Eul(m1, δ1) 〈 δ2 〉 V , (8) where the average is over cells of size V placed randomly in Eulerian space....
[...]
...(4) This expression was first derived by Mo & White (1996)....
[...]
...…in developing models for the shape and evolution of the mass function of collapsed dark matter haloes (Press & Schechter 1974; Bond et al. 1991; Lacey & Cole 1993) as well as for the evolution of the spatial distribution of these haloes (Mo & White 1996; Catelan et al. 1997; Sheth & Lemson 1999)....
[...]
...When a = 1 and p = 0 the mass function has the Press–Schechter form, and this formula reduces to the one given by Cole & Kaiser (1989) and Mo & White (1996)....
[...]
...The work of Mo & White (1996) shows that the exact form of this dependence can be computed provided that both the conditional and the unconditional mass functions are known (equation 4)....
[...]