scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Large scale comparison of global gene expression patterns in human and mouse

23 Dec 2010-Genome Biology (BioMed Central)-Vol. 11, Iss: 12, pp 1-11
TL;DR: The results indicate that the global patterns of tissue-specific expression of orthologous genes are conserved in human and mouse.
Abstract: It is widely accepted that orthologous genes between species are conserved at the sequence level and perform similar functions in different organisms. However, the level of conservation of gene expression patterns of the orthologous genes in different species has been unclear. To address the issue, we compared gene expression of orthologous genes based on 2,557 human and 1,267 mouse samples with high quality gene expression data, selected from experiments stored in the public microarray repository ArrayExpress. In a principal component analysis (PCA) of combined data from human and mouse samples merged on orthologous probesets, samples largely form distinctive clusters based on their tissue sources when projected onto the top principal components. The most prominent groups are the nervous system, muscle/heart tissues, liver and cell lines. Despite the great differences in sample characteristics and experiment conditions, the overall patterns of these prominent clusters are strikingly similar for human and mouse. We further analyzed data for each tissue separately and found that the most variable genes in each tissue are highly enriched with human-mouse tissue-specific orthologs and the least variable genes in each tissue are enriched with human-mouse housekeeping orthologs. The results indicate that the global patterns of tissue-specific expression of orthologous genes are conserved in human and mouse. The expression of groups of orthologous genes co-varies in the two species, both for the most variable genes and the most ubiquitously expressed genes.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors develop and implement a new simulation framework based on both the RNA-Seq and the Phylogenetic Comparative Methods literatures to generate realistic count datasets, while taking into account the phylogenetic relationships between the samples.
Abstract: Inter-species RNA-Seq datasets are increasingly common, and have the potential to answer new questions about the evolution of gene expression. Single species differential expression analysis is now a well studied problem that benefits from sound statistical methods. Extensive reviews on biological or synthetic datasets have provided the community with a clear picture on the relative performances of the available methods in various settings. However, synthetic dataset simulation tools are still missing in the inter-species gene expression context. In this work, we develop and implement a new simulation framework. This tool builds on both the RNA-Seq and the Phylogenetic Comparative Methods literatures to generate realistic count datasets, while taking into account the phylogenetic relationships between the samples. We illustrate the usefulness of this new framework through a targeted simulation study, that reproduces the features of a recently published dataset, containing gene expression data in adult eye tissue across blind and sighted freshwater crayfish species. Using our simulated datasets, we perform a fair comparison of several approaches used for differential expression analysis. This benchmark reveals some of the strengths and weaknesses of both the classical and phylogenetic approaches for inter-species differential expression analysis, and allows for a reanalysis of the crayfish dataset. The tool has been integrated in the R package compcodeR, freely available on Bioconductor.

2 citations

01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: A number of interesting and important mathematical and statistical properties of the integrative correlation coefficient are described, including a unique null distribution with the unusual property that the variance does not shrink as the sample size increases.
Abstract: The integrative correlation coefficient was developed to facilitate the validation of expression microarray results in public datasets, by identifying genes that seem to be reproducibly measured across studies and even across microarray platforms In the current study, we describe a number of interesting and important mathematical and statistical properties of the integrative correlation coefficient, including a unique null distribution with the unusual property that the variance does not shrink as the sample size increases, discussing how these findings impact its use and interpretation, and what they have to say about any method for identifying reproducible genes in a meta-analysis

2 citations


Cites methods from "Large scale comparison of global ge..."

  • ...Since its introduction, the method has been applied in a variety of situations to compare platforms[17], evaluate methodology[26], aid in meta-analysis of gene expression sets[11, 24, 32, 30], and even for comparisons across species[31]....

    [...]

Posted ContentDOI
19 Feb 2019-bioRxiv
TL;DR: A list of credible marker genes to facilitate correct cell identification, cell labeling, and cell function studies is provided and new criteria for identifying marker genes based on both differential expression and co-expression data is proposed.
Abstract: Reliable identification of brain cell types is necessary for studying brain cell biology. Many brain cell marker genes have been proposed, but their reliability has not been fully validated. We evaluated 540 commonly-used marker genes of astrocyte, microglia, neuron, and oligodendrocyte with six transcriptome and proteome datasets from purified human and mouse brain cells (n=125). By setting new criteria of cell-specific fold change, we identified 22 gold standard marker genes (GSM) with stable cell-specific expression. Our results call into question the specificity of many proposed marker genes. We used two single-cell transcriptome datasets from human and mouse brains to explore the co-expression of marker genes (n=3337). The mouse co-expression modules were perfectly preserved in human transcriptome, but the reverse was not. Also, we proposed new criteria for identifying marker genes based on both differential expression and co-expression data. We identified 16 novel candidate marker genes (NCM) for mouse and 18 for human independently, which have the potential for use in cell sorting or other tagging techniques. We validated the specificity of GSM and NCM by in-silico deconvolution analysis. Our systematic evaluation provides a list of credible marker genes to facilitate correct cell identification, cell labeling, and cell function studies.

1 citations

01 Jan 2017
TL;DR: Graph Analytics Methods In Feature Engineering: methods for graph analytics methods in feature engineering and their applications in graph engineering.
Abstract: Graph Analytics Methods In Feature Engineering. by

1 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) method as discussed by the authors focuses on gene sets, that is, groups of genes that share common biological function, chromosomal location, or regulation.
Abstract: Although genomewide RNA expression analysis has become a routine tool in biomedical research, extracting biological insight from such information remains a major challenge. Here, we describe a powerful analytical method called Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) for interpreting gene expression data. The method derives its power by focusing on gene sets, that is, groups of genes that share common biological function, chromosomal location, or regulation. We demonstrate how GSEA yields insights into several cancer-related data sets, including leukemia and lung cancer. Notably, where single-gene analysis finds little similarity between two independent studies of patient survival in lung cancer, GSEA reveals many biological pathways in common. The GSEA method is embodied in a freely available software package, together with an initial database of 1,325 biologically defined gene sets.

34,830 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is no obvious downside to using RMA and attaching a standard error (SE) to this quantity using a linear model which removes probe-specific affinities, and the exploratory data analyses of the probe level data motivate a new summary measure that is a robust multi-array average (RMA) of background-adjusted, normalized, and log-transformed PM values.
Abstract: SUMMARY In this paper we report exploratory analyses of high-density oligonucleotide array data from the Affymetrix GeneChip R � system with the objective of improving upon currently used measures of gene expression. Our analyses make use of three data sets: a small experimental study consisting of five MGU74A mouse GeneChip R � arrays, part of the data from an extensive spike-in study conducted by Gene Logic and Wyeth’s Genetics Institute involving 95 HG-U95A human GeneChip R � arrays; and part of a dilution study conducted by Gene Logic involving 75 HG-U95A GeneChip R � arrays. We display some familiar features of the perfect match and mismatch probe ( PM and MM )v alues of these data, and examine the variance–mean relationship with probe-level data from probes believed to be defective, and so delivering noise only. We explain why we need to normalize the arrays to one another using probe level intensities. We then examine the behavior of the PM and MM using spike-in data and assess three commonly used summary measures: Affymetrix’s (i) average difference (AvDiff) and (ii) MAS 5.0 signal, and (iii) the Li and Wong multiplicative model-based expression index (MBEI). The exploratory data analyses of the probe level data motivate a new summary measure that is a robust multiarray average (RMA) of background-adjusted, normalized, and log-transformed PM values. We evaluate the four expression summary measures using the dilution study data, assessing their behavior in terms of bias, variance and (for MBEI and RMA) model fit. Finally, we evaluate the algorithms in terms of their ability to detect known levels of differential expression using the spike-in data. We conclude that there is no obvious downside to using RMA and attaching a standard error (SE) to this quantity using a linear model which removes probe-specific affinities. ∗ To whom correspondence should be addressed

10,711 citations


"Large scale comparison of global ge..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...The resulting 1,323 CEL files were pre-processed using Bioconductor’s RMA package [32] to create an integrated, normalized data matrix....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, high-density oligonucleotide arrays offer the opportunity to examine patterns of gene expression on a genome scale, and the authors have designed custom arrays that interrogate the expression of the vast majority of proteinencoding human and mouse genes and have used them to profile a panel of 79 human and 61 mouse tissues.
Abstract: The tissue-specific pattern of mRNA expression can indicate important clues about gene function. High-density oligonucleotide arrays offer the opportunity to examine patterns of gene expression on a genome scale. Toward this end, we have designed custom arrays that interrogate the expression of the vast majority of protein-encoding human and mouse genes and have used them to profile a panel of 79 human and 61 mouse tissues. The resulting data set provides the expression patterns for thousands of predicted genes, as well as known and poorly characterized genes, from mice and humans. We have explored this data set for global trends in gene expression, evaluated commonly used lines of evidence in gene prediction methodologies, and investigated patterns indicative of chromosomal organization of transcription. We describe hundreds of regions of correlated transcription and show that some are subject to both tissue and parental allele-specific expression, suggesting a link between spatial expression and imprinting.

3,513 citations


"Large scale comparison of global ge..." refers background or result in this paper

  • ...While studies suggested that orthologous genes do not share similar expression patterns [1-5], other groups reported the opposite observations [6-9]....

    [...]

  • ...Alternatively, many other studies made use of species-specific arrays to identify coexpressed groups of orthologous genes [4-6,16,17]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ability of the trained ANN models to recognize SRBCTs is demonstrated, and the potential applications of these methods for tumor diagnosis and the identification of candidate targets for therapy are demonstrated.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop a method of classifying cancers to specific diagnostic categories based on their gene expression signatures using artificial neural networks (ANNs). We trained the ANNs using the small, round blue-cell tumors (SRBCTs) as a model. These cancers belong to four distinct diagnostic categories and often present diagnostic dilemmas in clinical practice. The ANNs correctly classified all samples and identified the genes most relevant to the classification. Expression of several of these genes has been reported in SRBCTs, but most have not been associated with these cancers. To test the ability of the trained ANN models to recognize SRBCTs, we analyzed additional blinded samples that were not previously used for the training procedure, and correctly classified them in all cases. This study demonstrates the potential applications of these methods for tumor diagnosis and the identification of candidate targets for therapy.

2,683 citations


"Large scale comparison of global ge..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...PCA has been often used to study high-dimensional data generated by genome-wide gene expression studies [22-25]....

    [...]

Book
27 Jan 2006
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a detailed case study of R algorithms with publicly available data, and a major section of the book is devoted to fully worked case studies, with a companion website where readers can reproduce every number, figure and table on their own computers.
Abstract: Full four-color book. Some of the editors created the Bioconductor project and Robert Gentleman is one of the two originators of R. All methods are illustrated with publicly available data, and a major section of the book is devoted to fully worked case studies. Code underlying all of the computations that are shown is made available on a companion website, and readers can reproduce every number, figure, and table on their own computers.

2,625 citations

Related Papers (5)