scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension

TL;DR: This paper shows that the essential condition for distribution-free learnability is finiteness of the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension, a simple combinatorial parameter of the class of concepts to be learned.
Abstract: Valiant's learnability model is extended to learning classes of concepts defined by regions in Euclidean space En. The methods in this paper lead to a unified treatment of some of Valiant's results, along with previous results on distribution-free convergence of certain pattern recognition algorithms. It is shown that the essential condition for distribution-free learnability is finiteness of the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension, a simple combinatorial parameter of the class of concepts to be learned. Using this parameter, the complexity and closure properties of learnable classes are analyzed, and the necessary and sufficient conditions are provided for feasible learnability.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a simple combinatorial criterion for determining concept classes that cannot be learned in the sense of Valiant from a polynomial number of positive-only examples is presented. The criterion is applied to several types of Boolean formulae in conjunctive and disjunctive normal form, to the majority function, to graphs with large connected components, and to neural networks with a single threshold unit.
Abstract: We present a simple combinatorial criterion for determining concept classes that cannot be learned in the sense of Valiant from a polynomial number of positive-only examples. The criterion is applied to several types of Boolean formulae in conjunctive and disjunctive normal form, to the majority function, to graphs with large connected components, and to a neural network with a single threshold unit. All are shown to be nonlearnable from positive-only examples.

11 citations

Book ChapterDOI
06 Oct 2013
TL;DR: This work states that, for any concept class \(\mathcal{C}\) of VC-dimension d, there is a sample compression scheme in which samples for concepts in \(C\) are compressed to samples of size at most d.
Abstract: Sample compression schemes are schemes for “encoding” a set of examples in a small subset of examples. The long-standing open sample compression conjecture states that, for any concept class \(\mathcal{C}\) of VC-dimension d, there is a sample compression scheme in which samples for concepts in \(\mathcal{C}\) are compressed to samples of size at most d.

11 citations

Proceedings Article
28 Jun 2000
TL;DR: Gentile and Littlestone as discussed by the authors proposed a boosting-based algorithm for learning linear threshold functions, which can be viewed as a natural PAC analog to the online p-norm algorithm.
Abstract: We describe a novel family of PAC model algorithms for learning linear threshold functions. The new algorithms work by boosting a simple weak learner and exhibit sample complexity bounds remarkably similar to those of known online algorithms such as Perceptron and Winnow, thus suggesting that these well-studied online algorithms in some sense correspond to instances of boosting. We show that the new algorithms can be viewed as natural PAC analogues of the online p-norm algorithms which have recently been studied by Grove, Littlestone, and Schuurmans (1997, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (pp. 171–183) and Gentile and Littlestone (1999, Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (pp. 1–11). As special cases of the algorithm, by taking p e 2 and p e ∞ we obtain natural boosting-based PAC analogues of Perceptron and Winnow respectively. The p e ∞ case of our algorithm can also be viewed as a generalization (with an improved sample complexity bound) of Jackson and Craven's PAC-model boosting-based algorithm for learning “sparse perceptrons” (Jackson & Craven, 1996, Advances in neural information processing systems 8, MIT Press). The analysis of the generalization error of the new algorithms relies on techniques from the theory of large margin classification.

11 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Nov 2006
TL;DR: This work looks at the learnability of the class of all pattern languages and asks whether or not one can design a learner within the paradigm of learning in the limit that is nevertheless efficient, and outlines a new learning model, called stochastic finite learning.
Abstract: Inductive inference can be considered as one of the fundamental paradigms of algorithmic learning theory. We survey results recently obtained and show their impact to potential applications.Since the main focus is put on the efficiency of learning, we also deal with postulates of naturalness and their impact to the efficiency of limit learners. In particular, we look at the learnability of the class of all pattern languages and ask whether or not one can design a learner within the paradigm of learning in the limit that is nevertheless efficient.For achieving this goal, we deal with iterative learning and its interplay with the hypothesis spaces allowed. This interplay has also a severe impact to postulates of naturalness satisfiable by any learner.Furthermore, since a limit learner is only supposed to converge, one never knows at any particular learning stage whether or not the learner did already succeed. The resulting uncertainty may be prohibitive in many applications. We survey results to resolve this problem by outlining a new learning model, called stochastic finite learning. Though pattern languages can neither be finitely inferred from positive data nor PAC-learned, our approach can be extended to a stochastic finite learner that exactly infers all pattern languages from positive data with high confidence.Finally, we apply the techniques developed to the problem of learning conjunctive concepts.

11 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This letter gives sharp bounds on the sample complexity of PAC-learning intersection-closed classes and demonstrates a useful application of the disagreement coefficient-a complexity measure developed for agnostic learning by Gine and Koltchinskii based on the work of Alexander and, independently, by Hanneke-in the realizable PAC- learning framework.

11 citations


Cites background from "Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervon..."

  • ...Warmuth conjectured in [4] that the factor of log(1/ε) in the upper bound can be overcome....

    [...]

  • ...We will show that Warmuth’s conjecture is indeed true for all intersection-closed classes....

    [...]

  • ...Our result settles an open problem posed by Auer and Ortner and supports a conjecture by Warmuth about the true sample complexity and the optimal PAC-learning algorithm for general classes....

    [...]

  • ...All rights reserved. hand, the best matching upper bound, which was proven by Blumer, Ehrenfeucht, Haussler and Warmuth [3], is O ( d log(1/ε) + log(1/δ) ε ) ....

    [...]

  • ...[3], showing that suph∈Vm errt,D(h) is upper bounded by D(DIS) · 4 n (d log 2en d + log 12 δ ) with a probability of at least 1 − δ/3....

    [...]

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1979
TL;DR: The second edition of a quarterly column as discussed by the authors provides a continuing update to the list of problems (NP-complete and harder) presented by M. R. Garey and myself in our book "Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness,” W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1979.
Abstract: This is the second edition of a quarterly column the purpose of which is to provide a continuing update to the list of problems (NP-complete and harder) presented by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness,’’ W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘[G&J]’’; previous columns will be referred to by their dates). A background equivalent to that provided by [G&J] is assumed. Readers having results they would like mentioned (NP-hardness, PSPACE-hardness, polynomial-time-solvability, etc.), or open problems they would like publicized, should send them to David S. Johnson, Room 2C355, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, including details, or at least sketches, of any new proofs (full papers are preferred). In the case of unpublished results, please state explicitly that you would like the results mentioned in the column. Comments and corrections are also welcome. For more details on the nature of the column and the form of desired submissions, see the December 1981 issue of this journal.

40,020 citations

Book
01 Jan 1968
TL;DR: The arrangement of this invention provides a strong vibration free hold-down mechanism while avoiding a large pressure drop to the flow of coolant fluid.
Abstract: A fuel pin hold-down and spacing apparatus for use in nuclear reactors is disclosed. Fuel pins forming a hexagonal array are spaced apart from each other and held-down at their lower end, securely attached at two places along their length to one of a plurality of vertically disposed parallel plates arranged in horizontally spaced rows. These plates are in turn spaced apart from each other and held together by a combination of spacing and fastening means. The arrangement of this invention provides a strong vibration free hold-down mechanism while avoiding a large pressure drop to the flow of coolant fluid. This apparatus is particularly useful in connection with liquid cooled reactors such as liquid metal cooled fast breeder reactors.

17,939 citations

Book
01 Jan 1973
TL;DR: In this article, a unified, comprehensive and up-to-date treatment of both statistical and descriptive methods for pattern recognition is provided, including Bayesian decision theory, supervised and unsupervised learning, nonparametric techniques, discriminant analysis, clustering, preprosessing of pictorial data, spatial filtering, shape description techniques, perspective transformations, projective invariants, linguistic procedures, and artificial intelligence techniques for scene analysis.
Abstract: Provides a unified, comprehensive and up-to-date treatment of both statistical and descriptive methods for pattern recognition. The topics treated include Bayesian decision theory, supervised and unsupervised learning, nonparametric techniques, discriminant analysis, clustering, preprosessing of pictorial data, spatial filtering, shape description techniques, perspective transformations, projective invariants, linguistic procedures, and artificial intelligence techniques for scene analysis.

13,647 citations