scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Light-at-night, circadian disruption and breast cancer: assessment of existing evidence

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
If a consensus eventually emerges that LAN does increase risk, then the mechanisms for the effect are important to elucidate for intervention and mitigation and will provide for the development of lighting technologies at home and at work that minimize circadian disruption, while maintaining visual efficiency and aesthetics.
Abstract
Background Breast cancer incidence is increasing globally for largely unknown reasons. The possibility that a portion of the breast cancer burden might be explained by the introduction and increasing use of electricity to light the night was suggested >20 years ago. Methods The theory is based on nocturnal light-induced disruption of circadian rhythms, notably reduction of melatonin synthesis. It has formed the basis for a series of predictions including that non-day shift work would increase risk, blind women would be at lower risk, long sleep duration would lower risk and community nighttime light level would co-distribute with breast cancer incidence on the population level. Results Accumulation of epidemiological evidence has accelerated in recent years, reflected in an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classification of shift work as a probable human carcinogen (2A). There is also a strong rodent model in support of the light-at-night (LAN) idea. Conclusion If a consensus eventually emerges that LAN does increase risk, then the mechanisms for the effect are important to elucidate for intervention and mitigation. The basic understanding of phototransduction for the circadian system, and of the molecular genetics of circadian rhythm generation are both advancing rapidly, and will provide for the development of lighting technologies at home and at work that minimize circadian disruption, while maintaining visual efficiency and aesthetics. In the interim, there are strategies now available to reduce the potential for circadian disruption, which include extending the daily dark period, appreciate nocturnal awakening in the dark, using dim red light for nighttime necessities, and unless recommended by a physician, not taking melatonin tablets.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Melatonin—A pleiotropic, orchestrating regulator molecule

TL;DR: Control of electron flux, prevention of bottlenecks in the respiratory chain and electron leakage contribute to the avoidance of damage by free radicals and seem to be important in neuroprotection, inflammatory diseases and, presumably, aging.
Journal ArticleDOI

The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal

TL;DR: A framework that focuses on the cross‐factoring of the ways in which artificial lighting alters natural light regimes (spatially, temporally, and spectrally), and the ways that light influences biological systems, particularly the distinction between light as a resource and light as an information source is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Shift work and chronic disease: the epidemiological evidence

TL;DR: Findings on shift work, in relation to risks of CVD, metabolic syndrome and diabetes are also suggestive but not conclusive for an adverse relationship, making it difficult to draw general conclusions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility

TL;DR: The amount of pollution is strongly dependent on the spectral characteristics of the lamps, with the more environmentally friendly lamps being low pressure sodium, followed by high pressure sodium and most polluting are the lamps with a strong blue emission, like Metal Halide and white LEDs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Circadian Clock Proteins and Immunity

TL;DR: Understanding the daily rhythm of the immune system could have implications for vaccinations and how the authors manage infectious and inflammatory diseases.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Profound bilateral blindness and the incidence of breast cancer.

TL;DR: Profoundly blind women were half as likely to have breast cancer as women who were not profoundly blind, and this effect diminished substantially with increasing age.
Journal ArticleDOI

Artificial lighting in the industrialized world: circadian disruption and breast cancer.

TL;DR: In a recent study, this paper showed that exogenous melatonin may contribute to circadian disruption rather than alleviate it, rather than contribute to the problem of breast cancer development and susceptibility.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new approach to understanding the impact of circadian disruption on human health

TL;DR: It should now be possible to bridge ecological studies of circadian disruption in humans to parametric studies of the relationships between circadian disruption and health outcomes using animal models, and to reveal the interrelationship between actual light exposures and markers of circadian rhythm.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk of breast cancer among Norwegian women with visual impairment.

TL;DR: These findings give support to the ‘melatonin hypothesis’ and suggest exposure to light suppresses melatonin secretion, but to a lesser degree in totally blind persons.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sympathetic input modulates, but does not determine, phase of peripheral circadian oscillators.

TL;DR: The hypothesis that peripheral oscillators may receive multiple signals contributing to their phase of entrainment, supported by data from a peripheral oscillator, the submaxillary salivary gland, in which temporal restriction of meals fails to entrain gene expression.
Related Papers (5)