Linking core self-evaluation and emotional exhaustion with workplace loneliness: does high LMX make the consequence worse?
Citations
43 citations
42 citations
22 citations
17 citations
References
1,638 citations
1,595 citations
"Linking core self-evaluation and em..." refers background in this paper
...This is an important omission as different types of relationships fulfil different interpersonal needs and consequent experience of loneliness (Weiss, 1973)....
[...]
...The social needs approach (Weiss, 1973) considers loneliness as a ‘social deficit’ and argues that no single relationship can satisfy all the basic provisions of social relationships....
[...]
1,567 citations
"Linking core self-evaluation and em..." refers methods in this paper
...Harman’s single factor test (Chang, Van Witteloostuijn, & Eden, 2010) and common method factor technique (MacKenzie & Podsakoff, 2012) were followed....
[...]
1,425 citations
"Linking core self-evaluation and em..." refers background in this paper
...Besides, they are resilient (Bono & Colbert, 2005) and are generally satisfied with life (Judge et al., 2002)....
[...]
1,402 citations
"Linking core self-evaluation and em..." refers background or methods in this paper
...One, the UCLA loneliness scale is one of the most widely used scales in loneliness literature (Ozcelik & Barsade, 2018) and known to be a ‘standard’ scale to measure the construct (Heinrich & Gullone, 2006)....
[...]
...This is because loneliness impacts individual’s emotional, cognitive, attitudinal, and behavioural outcomes (Heinrich & Gullone, 2006)....
[...]
...Loneliness not only influences an individual’s feelings about self (Heinrich & Gullone, 2006) but also feelings and behaviour towards others....
[...]
...Lonely employees usually have poor self-image (Heinrich & Gullone, 2006), low social skills (Gardner, Pickett, Jefferis, & Knowles, 2005; Heinrich & Gullone, 2006) and low willingness towards social risks (Lam & Lau, 2012)....
[...]
...The experience of loneliness is, thus, subjective and unique, i.e. it varies from individual to individual (Heinrich & Gullone, 2006)....
[...]