Local strain and damage measurements on a composite with digital image correlation and acoustic emission
Summary (2 min read)
Introduction
- Government authorities use resources on information campaigns in order to inform citizens about relevant policy changes.
- Individuals are rarely fully informed about proposed and existing policies, and a growing body of evidence suggests that individuals are not fully informed about the public policies relevant for their choices (Chetty, Looney, & Kroft, 2009; Chetty & Saez, 2013).
- The aim of the present paper is to investigate if the short-term effects, as documented in a previous paper (Finseras & Jakobsson, 2013) of public information materials on knowledge among the general public persists in the longer run.
The Experiment
- To study the effect of public information on knowledge the authors sent a survey questionnaire to 3,000 individuals between 40 and 67 years of age.
- 1,500 of these individuals were randomly allocated to a treatment group and 1,500 to a control group.
- The treatment consisted of receiving a standard information brochure from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service (NAV) on the recently implemented changes in the pension system.
- The brochure was emailed to the respondents in the treatment group as a link to a web page with a pdf (Portable Document Format) of the brochure six days before they received the first survey.
- The respondents were recruited from Yougov’s panel of individuals who have volunteered to participate in surveys.
Data and Descriptive Statistics
- A total of 662 individuals from the treatment group answered both rounds of the survey (44%), while 736 individuals from the control group answered (49%).
- Respondents in the treatment group both received the brochure and were asked to answer the questionnaire, while those in the control group were only asked to answer the questionnaire.
- Since the focus is the difference between the short- and medium-term effects of the treatment, the unbalanced sample is not of the same concern as in a standard experiment.
- With regards to generalizability to the general population, their sample includes more individuals with university education than does the population between 40 and 67 years of age (52.7% compared to 31.2%).
- In the present paper the authors report results including individuals that participated in both waves so their findings will not depend on changes of composition between the waves, however the generalizability of the results are weaker as compared to a sample that is more representative of the total population.
Results
- In this section the authors show the Intention-to-treat effects (ITT).
- The concern in their situation regards the possibility to extrapolate out of sample.
- Before moving on to the regression results the authors report the raw means for the treatment and control groups in the first and second wave (Table 2).
- The treated group is also 10 percentage points more likely to correctly identify that the new pension system will imply a higher pension if you decide to retire later and 7 percentage points more likely to correctly state that an increasing unemployment in your own cohort will not reduce your pension.
- Finally, the authors have also (for each of the four outcome variables) tested if the change in the knowledge between wave 1 and wave 2 between the treated and control group is statistically significant within each of the outcome variables.
Conclusion
- The authors find that respondents who were allocated to a group that receives an information brochure about the pension system are more likely to answer basic questions on the pension system correctly a week later.
- The monthly pension payment will be lower Life expectancy=1 if the respondent correctly states that her pension will be lower if the life expectancy of her cohort increases, 0 otherwise.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
73 citations
62 citations
33 citations
32 citations
30 citations
References
779 citations
353 citations
175 citations
151 citations
140 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. What is the effect of the engagement manoeuvre on the material temperature?
During the engagement manoeuvre, sliding contact occurs between the clutch facing and the counter faces (flywheel or pressure plate) which increases the material temperature.
Q3. What is the way to identify failure mechanisms?
Failure mechanisms can be identified with different non destructive techniques such as Acoustic Emission (AE) recording which can be used for damage monitoring7–12.
Q4. What was the aim of this work?
The aim of this work was to have a better understanding of the non-linearity of the stress-strain curve of the composite used in car clutch facings.
Q5. How was the AE system used in the laboratory?
To test the accuracy of the AE system when locating events, 100 dB events were generated on a marked specimen using pencil lead break.
Q6. What is the kinetics of the damage kinetics in the specimen?
The damage kinetics is non homogenously distributed in the specimen and the distribution is related to the local strain evolution during the tensile test.
Q7. What was the effect of the AE signals on the strain field?
Simultaneous measures of the strain field, using DIC, and damage location, using AE, were done on a rectangular specimen under monotonic tensile loading.
Q8. What is the AE rate in phase 1?
over a load of 60% of the maximum load the AE rate is constant and around 100 events per second, the flaw growth is controlled15.
Q9. How many times were the AE events counted?
Considering the location accuracy and the repositioning of each coordinate system, the AE events were counted on 5 mm strips, every five millimetres (no overlap).
Q10. What is the purpose of this work?
The aim of this work is to combine these two techniques to correlate strain measurements and damage location during a monotonic tensile test and determine if the non-linearity of the stress-strain curve is due to volume damage.
Q11. What was the AE signal on the surface of the 300°C cycled specimens?
Macroscopic cracks were found on the surface of the 300°C cycled specimens, however nothing was visible, at that scale, on the 200°C cycled.
Q12. How many thermal cycles did the specimens undergo?
To identify and quantify this degradation mechanism, specimens were submitted to 6 thermal cycles, described in Figure 10, with a maximum temperature of 200°C or 300°C.