Book•
Management of organizational behavior
01 Jan 1969-
TL;DR: A review of the book "Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, by Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard" is given in this article.
Abstract: The article presents a review of the book “Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources,” by Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard.
Citations
More filters
01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the personal values profile, the predominant leadership styles, the leadership effectiveness, the relationship between personal values balance and leadership effectiveness and organizational differentiation of a group of Brazilian executives of several organizations.
Abstract: The study sought to evaluate the personal values profile, the predominant leadership styles, the leadership effectiveness, the relationship between personal values balance and leadership effectiveness, the relationship between leadership effectiveness and organizational differentiation, and the relationship between personal values balance and organizational differentiation of a group of Brazilian executives of several organizations. In order to evaluate the personal values profile a closed instrument of the rank order type has been developed and applied. To identify the predominant leadership styles, as well as the leadership effectiveness of the involved executives, it has been used an instrument available in the market. To verify the relationship between personal values balance and leadership effectiveness, it has been used the linear regression method computing the linear correlation coefficient between the before mentioned variables, involving 400 executives. To compute the organizational differentiation, an existing model, the Organizational Differentiation Model, has been applied leading to the organizational differentiation index for each one of the 48 organizations involved. To investigate the relationship between leadership effectiveness, taken the average value per organization, and organizational differentiation, it has been used the linear regression computing the linear correlation coefficient between the before mentioned variables. The same procedure was used to investigate the relationship between personal values balance, taken the average value per organization, and organizational differentiation. The study has shown that the executives have an unbalance in their personal values profile, with predominance of economic and theoretical values. Additionally the study has uncovered lack of flexibility regarding the leadership styles, presenting styles of selling and sharing ideas as dominants. The study also showed that the leadership effectiveness of the involved executives was at a moderate level. Finally, the research pointed out a high positive relationship between personal values balance and leadership effectiveness, and, furthermore, it showed that both variables present a high positive relationship with the overall success of organizations measured by their organizational differentiation indexes.
2,917 citations
TL;DR: In contrast to the gender-stereotypic expectation that women lead in an interpersonaily oriented style and men in a task-oriented style, female and male leaders did not differ in these two styles in organizational studies as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Research comparing the leadership styles of women and men is reviewed, and evidence is found for both the presence and the absence of differences between the sexes. In contrast to the gender-stereotypic expectation that women lead in an interpersonaily oriented style and men in a task-oriented style, female and male leaders did not differ in these two styles in organizational studies. However, these aspects of leadership style were somewhat gender stereotypic in the two other classes of leadership studies investigated, namely (a) laboratory experiments and (b) assessment studies, which were denned as research that assessed the leadership styles of people not selected for occupancy of leadership roles. Consistent with stereotypic expectations about a different aspect of leadership style, the tendency to lead democratically or autocratically, women tended to adopt a more democratic or participative style and a less autocratic or directive style than did men. This sex difference appeared in all three classes of leadership studies, including those conducted in organizations. These and other findings are interpreted in terms of a social role theory of sex differences in social behavior.
2,529 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that to be truly transformational, leadership must be grounded in moral foundations, and the moral character of the leaders and their concerns for self and others.
Abstract: The morality of transformational leadership has been sharply questioned, particularly by libertarians, “grass roots” theorists, and organizational development consultants. This paper argues that to be truly transformational, leadership must be grounded in moral foundations. The four components of authentic transformational leadership (idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration) are contrasted with their counterfeits in dissembling pseudo -transformational leadership on the basis of (1) the moral character of the leaders and their concerns for self and others; (2) the ethical values embedded in the leaders' vision, articulation, and program, which followers can embrace or reject; and (3) the morality of the processes of social ethical choices and action in which the leaders and followers engage and collectively pursue. The literature on transformational leadership is linked to the long-standing literature on virtue and moral character, as exemplified by Socratic and Confucian typologies. It is related as well to the major themes of the modern Western ethical agenda: liberty, utility, and distributive justice Deception, sophistry, and pretense are examined alongside issues of transcendence, agency, trust, striving for congruence in values, cooperative action, power, persuasion, and corporate governance to establish the strategic and moral foundations of authentic transformational leadership.
2,243 citations
TL;DR: There is universality in the transactional transformational leadership paradigm as discussed by the authors and the same conception of phenomena and relationships can be observed in a wide range of organizations and cultures, and exceptions can be understood as a consequence of unusual attributes of the organizations or cultures.
Abstract: There is universality in the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm. That is, the same conception of phenomena and relationships can be observed in a wide range of organizations and cultures. Exceptions can be understood as a consequence of unusual attributes of the organizations or cultures. Three corollaries are discussed. Supportive evidence has been gathered in studies conducted in organizations in business, education, the military, the government, and the independent sector. Likewise, supportive evidence has been accumulated from all but 1 continent to document the applicability of the paradigm.
2,082 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a model linking organizational contexts to charismatic leadership is proposed, and a series of research hypotheses are offered to explain the lack of a systematic conceptual framework for organizational leadership.
Abstract: Charismatic leadership has been largely overlooked by organizational theorists. In part, the problem can be attributed to the lack of a systematic conceptual framework Drawing from political science, sociology, and social psychology, this paper addresses the problem by proposing a model linking organizational contexts to charismatic leadership. A series of research hypotheses is offered.
1,860 citations