scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article found that workers in more participatory settings were no more likely than others to report heavy workloads or excessive demands on their time, and were more likely to be satisfied with their surroundings.
Abstract
Much of the hoopla surrounding quality circles, teams, and high-performance work systems has been based on anecdotes and very thin evidence. It has not been established that those employee involvement strategies amount to anything more than another series of management fads or ruses designed to get more out of workers without giving them anything in return. This revelatory book, written by some of the skeptics, lays some of the suspicion to rest. Based on their visits to 44 plants and surveys of more than 4,000 employees, Eileen Appelbaum, Thomas Bailey, Peter Berg, and Arne L. Kalleberg concluded that companies are indeed more successful when managers share knowledge and power with workers and when workers assume increased responsibility and discretion. The study of steel, apparel, and medical electronics and imaging plants revealed much. In self-directed teams, workers were able to eliminate bottlenecks and coordinate the work process. In task forces created to improve quality, they communicated with individuals outside their own work groups and were able to solve problems. Expensive equipment in steel mills operated with fewer interruptions, turnaround and labor costs were cut in apparel factories, and costly inventories of components and medical equipment were reduced. And what did the employees think? The worker survey showed that jobs in participatory work systems often provide more challenging tasks and more opportunities for creativity. Employees in apparel had higher hourly earnings; those in steel had both higher hourly earnings and higher job satisfaction. Workers in more participatory settings were no more likely than others to report heavy workloads or excessive demands on their time. They were, however, less likely to report involuntary overtime or conflict with co-workers, and were more likely to be satisfied with their surroundings. Manufacturing Advantage provides the best assessment available of the effectiveness of high-performance work systems. Freestanding chapters near the end of the book provide full documentation of research data without interrupting the narrative flow.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms

TL;DR: The authors examined the effects of three dimensions of HR systems (skillsenhancing, motivationenhancing and opportunity-enhancing) on the ability-motivation-opportunity model.
Journal ArticleDOI

High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined processes (mediation and moderation) linking high-performance human resource practices and productivity and turnover, two indicators of organizational performance, taking a relational perspective on the employment relationship.
Journal ArticleDOI

Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors make a case for the integration of the largely separate literatures of environmental management (EM) and human resource management (HRM) research, and they categorize the existing literature on the basis of Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Impact of High-Performance Human Resource Practices on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors

TL;DR: The authors examined the relationship between employees' perceptions of high-performance HR practice use in their job groups and employee absenteeism, intent to remain with the organization, and organizational citizenship behavior, dedicating a focus to the possible mediating role of affective organizational commitment in these relationships.
Journal ArticleDOI

A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes

TL;DR: In this article, a multilevel study of 257 employees, 44 managers, and 1,993 customers from 25 restaurants was conducted to investigate the service performance of 25 restaurants in the US.
Related Papers (5)