Mapping the Moral Domain
Citations
702 citations
609 citations
605 citations
Cites background from "Mapping the Moral Domain"
...Anthropology suggests that morality encompasses more than interpersonal harm (Shweder et al., 1987), an idea extended by Haidt, Graham, and colleagues (Graham et al., 2011; Haidt & Graham, 2007) in their model of five independent moral domains: harm, fairness, in-group, authority, and purity....
[...]
438 citations
Cites background or methods from "Mapping the Moral Domain"
...Please cite this article in press as: Koleva, S. P., et al. Tracing the threads: How Journal of Research in Personality (2012), doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006 with statements that embody or negate each foundation, e.g., ‘‘It is more important to be a team player than to express oneself’’ for Ingroup (the MFQ items can be found at www.moralfoundations.org)....
[...]
...Since both RWA and SDO were used as external validity criteria for the MFQ (Graham et al., 2011) we expected that the conceptual and measurement overlap in these constructs would tend to reduce the original associations....
[...]
...The MFQ is a 30-item measure of the extent to which an individual endorses each of five types of moral concerns: Harm, Fairness, Ingroup, Authority, and Purity (see Graham et al., 2011 for an extensive analysis of its psychometric properties)....
[...]
...Here we report results for those who completed both the MFQ and a second morality survey....
[...]
...Participants were 14,517 adult US residents who self-selected to take both the MFQ and a survey called ‘‘Political Attitudes Questionnaire’’ at www.yourmorals.org....
[...]
410 citations
Cites background from "Mapping the Moral Domain"
...The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) measures the degree to which a person relies on each of five moral foundations: harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity....
[...]
...The MFQ has been shown to be reliable and valid, and to predict a variety of moral and political attitudes, independent of political ideology [41]....
[...]
...We addressed this question by examining several measures designed to give a broad overview of a person’s values and morals, in particular the Moral Foundations Questionnaire [41], and the Schwartz Value Scale [42], as well as a new measure of endorsement of liberty as a moral principle, introduced here (see Appendix S1)....
[...]
...First, we conducted a cluster analysis of participants using Moral Foundations Questionnaire sub-scale scores, to see if we could statistically extract libertarians based on their pattern of responses concerning their values, rather than on their self-identification....
[...]
...But as we began to collect data on libertarians and to hear objections from libertarians that their core value was not well represented, we created questions related to liberty in the style of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire....
[...]
References
15,228 citations
13,453 citations
12,151 citations
"Mapping the Moral Domain" refers background or methods in this paper
...For Harm, the external criterion was the Empathy subscale of the IRI (Davis, 1983); for Fairness, the Schwartz Equality value item (Schwartz, 1992); for Ingroup, the Schwartz Loyalty value item (Schwartz, 1992); for Authority, the Right-Wing Authoritarianism scale (Zakrisson, 2005); and for Purity,…...
[...]
...…(reverse-scored, as it measures preference for social inequalities; Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994; n 1,215), importance of being fair/just on Barriga et al.’s (2001) Good-Self scale, and endorsement of the social justice item on the Schwartz Values Scale (SVS; Schwartz, 1992)....
[...]
...…subscale of the IRI (Davis, 1983); for Fairness, the Schwartz Equality value item (Schwartz, 1992); for Ingroup, the Schwartz Loyalty value item (Schwartz, 1992); for Authority, the Right-Wing Authoritarianism scale (Zakrisson, 2005); and for Purity, the Disgust Scale—Revised (Haidt, McCauley,…...
[...]
...Most efforts to identify the range of values begin with long lists of possible values, covering everything from cleanliness to hedonism, and then use factor analysis of endorsement ratings to identify a smaller set of core values (Rokeach, 1973; Schwartz, 1992)....
[...]
[...]
10,880 citations