Marchenko redatuming, imaging, and multiple elimination and their mutual relations
Citations
14 citations
8 citations
7 citations
7 citations
References
1,373 citations
"Marchenko redatuming, imaging, and ..." refers background in this paper
...It is a 3D generalization of the ‘fundamental solution’ in 1D scattering problems (Lamb, 1980)....
[...]
1,139 citations
"Marchenko redatuming, imaging, and ..." refers background in this paper
...Unlike in seismic interferometry (Campillo and Paul, 2003; Wapenaar, 2003; Schuster et al., 2004; Bakulin and Calvert, 2006; Gouédard et al., 2008), no physical receiver is needed at the position of the virtual source....
[...]
740 citations
"Marchenko redatuming, imaging, and ..." refers background in this paper
...Hence, the reflection response R in equations 4 and 5 contains no surface-related multiples, which complies with the situation after surface-related multiple elimination (Verschuur et al., 1992; van Groenestijn and Verschuur, 2010)....
[...]
519 citations
"Marchenko redatuming, imaging, and ..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Note the similarity with the classical redatuming scheme (Berkhout, 1982; Berryhill, 1984; Berkhout and Wapenaar, 1993), which in the compact operator notation reads Rtar ≈ f+t1,dRf+1,d. (29) Recall that f+1,d is the direct contribution of focusing operator f+1 , see Figures 1a and 1b....
[...]
...Traditionally this is done with one-way wave field extrapolation operators (or ‘focusing operators’) which account for primaries only (Berkhout, 1982; Berryhill, 1984)....
[...]
...When the reflectivity is angle-dependent, r(xA) should actually be replaced by a kernel r(x′A,xA, t), and extra integrals along SA and time should be included in equation 89 (Berkhout, 1982; de Bruin et al., 1990)....
[...]
497 citations