scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Market distortions and local indeterminacy: A general approach

01 May 2014-Journal of Economic Theory (Academic Press)-Vol. 151, pp 216-247
TL;DR: In this paper, the role of market distortions on the emergence of indeterminacy and bifurcations is investigated, and it is shown that distortions in the capital market do not play a major role.
About: This article is published in Journal of Economic Theory.The article was published on 2014-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 7 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Indeterminacy (literature) & Elasticity of substitution.

Summary (4 min read)

1 Introduction

  • In this paper the authors develop a methodology to study and fully characterize the role of market distortions on the occurrence of local indeterminacy and bifurcations.
  • These papers provide examples to apply their general methodology (see Section 4).
  • 3Weak values of this elasticity are not empirically relevant (Hamermesh (1993), Duffy and Papageorgiou (2000)).
  • On the other hand, the authors also discuss the degrees of specific market distortions required for the occurrence of indeterminacy under empirically plausible values (i.e. around one) of the elasticity of capital-labor substitution.
  • The authors confirm, focusing on capital income taxation, that distortions on the capital market do not, per se, promote indeterminacy.

2 The model

  • The authors framework extends the perfectly competitive Woodford model to take into account market imperfections.
  • In the cases of productive externalities, imperfect competition in the product market or with consumption, labor or capital taxation, the real interest rate and/or the real wage relevant to consumers’ decisions are no longer equal to the marginal productivities of capital and labor at the firm level.
  • Empirical studies also show that the wage bill is increasing in labor.
  • Hence, the occurrence of indeterminacy and bifurcations in their framework is due to the existence of market distortions, mainly through their effects on αi,j, which are more relevant than βi,j when inputs are not weak substitutes in production.

3 The role of market distortions on local dy-

  • The authors then analyze the occurrence of indeterminacy and bifurcations by studying how T and D evolve in the space (T,D) as some relevant parameters of the model are made to vary continuously in their admissible range, according to the geometrical method developed in Grandmont et al. (1998).
  • To locate these values in the plane (T,D), three lines are relevant .
  • The first condition, necessary for indeterminacy when D′1 (σ) < 0, can only be met with distortions.
  • Take εγ ∈ [1,∞) as the bifurcation parameter with Hopf, flip and transcritical bifurcation values εγH εγF and εγT , respectively given in (23),(24) and (25).18 (a) Consider that αKK takes either nonpositive or positive values.
  • 18Assumptions 3 and 4 are satisfied in all the examples considered in the related literature, and simplify considerably their analysis.

3.1 Discussion of the results

  • By inspection of Tables 1 and 2, the authors see that, when capital and labor are sufficiently substitutable in production, indeterminacy and bifurcations occur in the presence of market distortions.
  • 20 Indeterminacy requires a critical lower bound on the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor (σ), which may be different across configurations.
  • ΣH1 is no longer a necessary condition for indeterminacy, indeterminacy also requires a lower bound for σ.
  • Indeterminacy also requires a critical upper bound (either ǫγH or ǫγT ) on ǫγ, depending on the configuration considered.
  • This is a new interesting result that will be illustrated and further discussed in the economic examples provided in Section 4.

3.1.1 Distortions on the ̺ and Ω functions

  • The authors start with the case where distortions affecting only the ̺ and Ω functions are present (αΓ,i = βΓ,i = 0), as it happens, for example, when they only have product or capital market distortions (see Section 4).
  • Then, only configurations (i)− (iv) can be obtained (see (19)), where, as seen above, σ > σH1 is a necessary condition for indeterminacy.
  • Let us now discuss in detail the role of distortions affecting the ̺ function.
  • For αK,K > 0, given the necessary condition αL,L > θαK,K, indeterminacy requires a positive value for αL,L.

3.1.2 Distortions on the Ω and Γ functions

  • The authors consider now distortions that only affect both Ω and Γ, i.e. the intertemporal trade-off condition of workers, as it happens, for instance, when they have labor market imperfections (see Section 4).
  • These last two configurations require that αΓL < α ∗ ΓL as shown in (21).
  • Thus, indeterminacy is possible when the only distortion is an arbitrarily small negative αΓ,L.
  • While general distortions on the real interest rate do not seem to play a major role on the occurrence of indeterminacy, distortions on the generalized offer curve and on the effective consumption seem to help the occurrence of indeterminacy.
  • This would require infinitely large elasticities of private labor supply and of substitution between inputs.

4 Applications

  • The authors now proceed by applying their general methodology and results to several examples that provide microeconomic foundations for the model developed above.
  • The strategy used to analyze each example is the following.
  • The authors also discuss the minimal degree of distortions required for indeterminacy to occur with an empirically plausible value of the elasticity of capital-labor substitution (around 1).
  • The authors will see in particular that indeterminacy emerges under new configurations (those of Table 1 and Table 2), and that for some sets of distortions’ parameters indeterminacy requires a value for ǫγ bounded away from 1.

4.1 Examples with the same distortion on the real in-

  • In the examples presented below, the same distortion affects both the real interest rate and the real wage, but the generalized offer curve coincides with the competitive one, Γ(K,L) = γ(L).
  • 28They are usually justified by learning by doing or matching problems on labor market.
  • Hence negative externalities illustrate the result, discussed in Section 3, that indeterminacy cannot occur when αK,i and αL,i are all negative.
  • The authors will now emphasize that, for the analysis of local dynamics, many models with imperfect competition on the product market are, in fact, a particular case of the previous framework with positive productive externalities.
  • The same happens when imperfect competition is associated with markup variability or with taste for variety, as the authors now show.

4.2 Examples with different distortions on the real in-

  • This will allow us to emphasize that capital market distortions are not, per se, the most relevant ones for indeterminacy.
  • The authors start with the case of capital taxation without public spending externalities in preferences, so that market distortions only appear in the function ̺(K,L).
  • 38Notice that this implies that indeterminacy only occurs when υ > 0, i.e., consumption externalities are of the "keeping-up with the Joneses" type.
  • Indeed, when there is only capital income taxation, the steady state is always a saddle.

4.3 Examples with distortions only on the generalized

  • In the examples presented in this section distortions only affect the generalized offer curve.
  • The authors can easily see that Assumptions 1 and 4 are ensured.
  • This shows that it should be misleading to focus only on the case of an infinitely elastic labor supply when the authors want to fully study the role of some labor market distortions on the occurrence of indeterminacy.
  • Therefore, this last model can be seen as a particular case of not too negative aggregate labor externalities in leisure utility.
  • 44Each worker supplies one unit of labor with a labor desutility that depends on the level of effort.

4.4 Examples with distortions on the generalized offer

  • L) and Ω(K,L) are affected by market distortions, while the capital market remains perfectly competitive.the authors.
  • This case is new, and is able to illustrate most of the dynamic results exhibited in the general framework.
  • Unions are able to set wages above a reservation wage, with a markup factor µ(K,L) = 1−αs(K/L) 1−s(K/L) ≥ 1, increasing in the bargaining power of unions (1−α) ∈ [0, 1).47 Employment is determined by the equality between the reservation wage and the marginal productivity of labor.
  • 46See Grandmont (2008) for a more detailed discussion.
  • Assuming that government expenditures (Gt) provide services that affect not only workers’ utility for consumption, but also their desutility of labor, the authors will be able to provide an illustration of configuration (vi).

5 Concluding remarks

  • With their general analysis of the role of market distortions on local dynamics and the different examples of specific distortions presented above, the authors were able to they emphasize several interesting results, some of them already latent in previous works, but which are here confirmed, generalized and highlighted.
  • 58 further research on this issue is welcome.
  • Second, although the authors only discuss local deterministic indeterminacy and cycles, they may be able to construct stochastic sunspot cycles along indeterminacy and bifurcations 56Some recent works confirm the importance of labor market imperfections in explaining real business cycles data.
  • If the authors estimate the relevant parameters of their general formulation, they will not be able to identify a particular source of specific distortions among those, which belonging to the same class, are observationally equivalent.

6.3 Local stability properties

  • The authors main interest is to understand how the existence of market imperfections change the characterization of local stability properties in terms of the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor, σ, and of the elasticity of the private offer curve, εγ, while keeping s and θ constant at values satisfying Assumption 1.1.
  • Most of the distortions considered in the literature satisfy this condition.

6.4.1 Derivation of Proposition 1

  • And the half-line ∆1, that starts on (AC) and points upwards to the left, crosses (AB) above point B. See Figure 4. 61This last case does not appear if σH2 does not exist.
  • With the help of geometrical arguments the authors can see that when σH2 > s−βLL 1+αLL exists, then σH2 > σH3. 69 However σH2 may be higher or lower than σF .
  • To simplify the exposition the authors only present in Table 2 the results for this configuration assuming that σH2 > σF . 70 Configuration (vi) (S1 ∈ (SD, 1)) 71 Define σS2 as the critical value of σ such that the half line ∆ goes through point A.72.
  • All these results are summarized in Table 2.

6.8 Existence of σH2

  • To discuss the existence and uniqueness of σH2 , the authors consider first the configurations where S1 ∈ (0, 1), and then the remaining ones.
  • Note that the equation ǫγH = ǫγT is a polynomial of degree 2, i.e. has at most two solutions.
  • Note that in this particular case, ǫγT does not depend on σ.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the intertemporal budget constraint of the government can be a fundamental source of indeterminacy, and therefore, of expectations-driven fluctuations, and that this is promoted by a larger ratio of debt over GDP.

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a multistep monotone map approach is developed to characterize minimal state-space recursive equilibrium for a broad class of infinite horizon dynamic general equilibrium models with positive externalities, dynamic complementarities, public policy, equilibrium indeterminacy, and sunspots.
Abstract: We develop a new multistep monotone map approach to characterize minimal state-space recursive equilibrium for a broad class of infinite horizon dynamic general equilibrium models with positive externalities, dynamic complementarities, public policy, equilibrium indeterminacy, and sunspots. This new approach is global, defined in the equilibrium version of the household’s Euler equation, applies to economies for which there are no known existence results, and existing methods are inapplicable. Our methods are able to distinguish different structural properties of recursive equilibria. In stark contrast to the extensive body of existing work on these models, our methods make no appeal to the theory of smooth dynamical systems that are commonly applied in the literature. Actually, sufficient smoothness to apply such methods cannot be established relative to the set of recursive equilibria. Our partial ordering methods also provide a qualitative theory of equilibrium comparative statics in the presence of multiple equilibrium. These robust equilibrium comparison results are shown to be computable via successive approximations from subsolutions and supersolutions in sets of candidate equilibrium function spaces. We provide applications to an extensive literature on local indeterminacy of dynamic equilibrium.

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that a strong social norm to work destabilizes conventional wisdom by reversing the negative effects of social security on employment, and destabilizes the economy by facilitating the emergence of endogenous fluctuations.

5 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors build a macro-dynamic model with investment and price as the core macroeconomic variables and show that the interaction between the stabilization mechanism (price adjustment) and the destabilization mechanism (investment adjustment) generates fluctuations and cycles.

3 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an economie multi-branches a generations imbriquees, ou les entreprises de chaque branche vivent deux periodes, investissant strategiquement en premiere and produisant sous regime de concurrence cournotienne en seconde periode.
Abstract: Nous etudions une economie multi-branches a generations imbriquees, ou les entreprises de chaque branche vivent deux periodes, investissant strategiquement en premiere et produisant sous regime de concurrence cournotienne en seconde periode. Les equilibres des jeux en deux etapes, ainsi que sur les marches des produits, du travail et du capital, determinent le nombre d’entreprises a chaque periode et un systeme dynamique a deux equations. L’emergence de fluctuations endogenes robustes comme consequence de l’investissement strategique est mise en lumiere par contraste avec un modele sans investissement strategique et avec libre entree.

2 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the role of tax policies in productivity-shock driven economies with catching-up-with-the-Joneses utility functions was examined and the optimal tax policy was shown to affect the economy countercyclically via procyclical taxes.
Abstract: This paper examines the role for tax policies in productivity-shock driven economies with catching-up-with-the-Joneses utility functions. The optimal tax policy is shown to affect the economy countercyclically via procyclical taxes, i.e., "cooling down" the economy with higher taxes when it is "overheating" in booms and "stimulating" the economy with lower taxes in recessions to keep consumption up. Thus, models with catching-up-with-the-Joneses utility functions call for traditional Keynesian demand-management policies but for rather unorthodox reasons.

554 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The authors examined the cyclical behavior of price/marginal cost margins for U.S. manufac turing after 1956 and found that short run marginal cost is markedly procyclical.
Abstract: The author examines the cyclical behavior of price/marginal cost margins for U.S. manufac turing after 1956. Short-run marginal cost is markedly procyclical. This is primarily due to procyclical overtime payments, incurred beca use employment is not perfectly flexible. In most industries, output price fails to respond to the cyclical movement in marginal cost; so price/marginal cost margins are markedly countercyclical. The res ults contradict business cycle theories that explain low production i n a recession by a high real cost of producing; they support theories that explain low production in a recession by the inability of firms to sell their output. Copyright 1987 by American Economic Association.

554 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors use a panel of 82 countries over a 28-year period to estimate a general constant-elasticity-of-substitution (CES) production function specification.
Abstract: Many growth models assume that aggregate output is generated by a Cobb-Douglas production function. In this article we question the empirical relevance of this specification. We use a panel of 82 countries over a 28-year period to estimate a general constant-elasticity-of-substitution (CES) production function specification. We find that for the entire sample of countries we can reject the Cobb-Douglas specification. When we divide our sample of countries up into several subsamples, we find that physical capital and human capital adjusted labor are more substitutable in the richest group of countries and are less substitutable in the poorest group of countries than would be implied by a Cobb-Douglas specification.

535 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider three leading theories of markup determination: monopolistic competition, customer market, and individual firms' incentives to deviate from an implicit collusive understanding, and show that these three theories can be nested in a single specification that makes markups a function of current sales and of the expected present discount.
Abstract: As output and employment rise in business cycle booms, the marginal product of labor falls while real wages generally do not. So marginal cost, which equals the wage divided by the marginal product of labor, rises more than do prices. In this paper we examine this business cycle variation in the markup of price over marginal cost. We consider three leading theories of markup determination. The first is that firms are monopolistic competitors and that the elasticities of their demand curves vary over the business cycle. The second is the customer market model of Phelps and Winter (1970) where firms' markups also depend on the desirability of raising current market share in order to increase future sales. The third has markups depend on individual firms' incentives to deviate from an implicit collusive understanding, as in Rotemberg and Saloner (1986). We show that these three theories can be nested in a single specification that makes markups a function of current sales and of the expected present discount...

439 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: An overview of the recent literature on indeterminacy and sunspots in macroeconomics can be found in this article, where a simple framework for illustrating the mechanisms of various dynamic equilibrium models that give rise to indeterminate equilibria is provided.
Abstract: This chapter gives an overview of the recent literature on indeterminacy and sunspots in macroeconomics. It discusses of some of the conceptual and the technical aspects of this literature, and provides a simple framework for illustrating the mechanisms of various dynamic equilibrium models that give rise to indeterminate equilibria. The role of external effects, monopolistic competition, and increasing returns in generating indeterminacy is explored for one-sector and multi-sector models of real business cycles and of economic growth. Indeterminacy is also studied in monetary models, as well as in models where monetary and fiscal policy are endogenous and determined by feedback rules. Particular attention is paid to the empirical plausibility of these models and their parametrizations in generating indeterminate equilibria. An overview of calibrated macroeconomic models with sunspot equilibria is given, and their successes and shortcomings in matching properties of data are assessed. Finally some issues regarding the selection of equilibria, the observable implications, and difficulties of forecasting that arise in such models are briefly addressed.

400 citations

Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Market distortions and local indeterminacy: a general approach" ?

The authors provide a general methodology to study the role of market distortions on local indeterminacy and bifurcations. 

Empirical analysis on this issue is therefore an important direction for further research. 56 A possible explanation for these results may be linked to the fact that future expectations, which open the room for fluctuations driven by selffulfilling expectations, only affect the current decisions of consumers/workers, thus rendering distortions that affect the intertemporal trade-off of consumers/workers more important than those affecting the capital accumulation equation. Although some works have already considered some of these aspects,58 further research on this issue is welcome. Second, although the authors only discuss local deterministic indeterminacy and cycles, they may be able to construct stochastic sunspot cycles along indeterminacy and bifurcations 56Some recent works confirm the importance of labor market imperfections in explaining real business cycles data. 

the occurrence of indeterminacy and bifurcations in their framework is due to the existence of market distortions, mainly through their effects on αi,j, which are more relevant than βi,j when inputs are not weak substitutes in production. 

Market distortions play a role on the local stability properties of the steady state because they modify the elasticities of three crucial functions that characterize their two dimensional equilibrium dynamic system: the real interest rate, the real wage or equivalently effective consumption per unit of labor, and the generalized offer curve. 

In configurations (ii).1 and (iii).1 indeterminacy emerges for σ > σH1 = s−(1−s−ψ)(η−µ)−θ(1−s)(1+µ)ψ(η−µ) , provided εγis sufficiently small. 

By loglinearizing the system (3)-(4) around the normalized steady state,we obtain the local dynamics for K̂t = (Kt −K) /K and L̂t+1 = (Lt+1 − L) /L given by following equations:[ K̂t L̂t+1 ] = [ (1 + θε̺,K) θε̺,L ǫΓ,K−εΩ,K(1+θε̺,K)1+εΩ,LεΓ,L−θεΩ,Kε̺,L 1+εΩ,L ][ K̂t−1 L̂t ] ≡ [J ] [ Kt−1−K K Lt−L L ](6) Market distortions influence the local dynamics of the model, relatively to the perfectly competititive case, by modifying the elasticities εΩ,i, ε̺,i and εΓ,i. 

Although their methodology can be applied to any dynamic general equilibrium model, the dynamic framework considered in this paper is based on the perfectly competitive one sector model of a segmented asset economy of Woodford (1986) and Grandmont et al. (1998). 

Note also that bifurcations are quite relevant in explaining persistency of business fluctuations, since they appear when at least one eigenvalue crosses the unit circle. 

In the first example presented the authors consider a perfectly competitive economy where public expenditures, financed by variable taxation under a balanced budget rule, are introduced. 

In what follows, the authors denote by εX,y the elasticity, evaluated at the steady state, of the function X = {̺,Ω,Γ} with respect to the argument y = {K,L}, while εγ − 1 0 is the inverse of the elasticity of labor supply of the representative worker with respect to labor, s ∈ (0, 1) the elasticity of the production function with respect to capital, and σ > 0 is the elasticity of capital-labor substitution of the representative firm, all evaluated at the private level and at the steady state. 

As seen above, indeterminacy is possible in the presence of arbitrarily small distortions affecting either effective consumption or the offer curve. 

On the contrary, under labor market distortions (unions, efficiency wages, unemployment benefits, externalities in preferences), indeterminacy and bifurcations emerge for empirically plausible distortions. 

A perfect foresight intertemporal equilibrium of the economy with market distortions is a sequence (Kt−1, Lt) ∈ R 2 ++, t = 1, 2, ...,∞, that for a given K0 > 0 satisfies:Kt = β [1− δ + ̺t]Kt−1 (3)(1/B)Ωt+1Lt+1 = Γt (4)where ̺t ≡ A̺(Kt−1, Lt), Ωt ≡ AΩ(Kt−1, Lt) and Γt ≡ Γ(Kt−1, Lt). 

The first example is based on Dufourt et al. (2008), where the Woodford finance constrained framework is extended to take into account the existence of involuntary unemployment (see also Lloyd-Braga and Modesto (2007)). 

Trending Questions (1)
How to calculate labror market distortion?

The paper does not provide a specific method for calculating labor market distortions.