scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study

TL;DR: The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study as discussed by the authors is the largest single-cohort prospective longitudinal study of neurodevelopment and children's health in the United States.
About: This article is published in NeuroImage.The article was published on 2021-10-01 and is currently open access. It has received 16 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Population & Longitudinal study.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a brief overview of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) methods and how they can be used to study white matter and connectivity and review the extant literature examining the links between dMRI indices and executive functions during development.

19 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a longitudinal structural equation model was used to examine the indirect effect of adversity exposure (negative life events) on later psychopathology via changes in cortico-limbic resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC).

16 citations

Posted ContentDOI
06 Jun 2021-bioRxiv
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used restricted isotropic and anisotropic diffusion across the brain and measured cross-sectional and longitudinal age associations in a large sample (n=8,039) aged 9-13 years from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) StudySM.
Abstract: Development in late childhood has been associated with microstructural changes in white matter (WM) that are hypothesized to underpin concurrent changes in cognitive and behavioral function. Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) is a framework for modelling diffusion-weighted imaging that can probe microstructural changes within hindered and restricted compartments providing greater specificity than diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing intracellular diffusion. Using RSI, we modelled voxelwise restricted isotropic, N0, and anisotropic, ND, diffusion across the brain and measured cross-sectional and longitudinal age associations in a large sample (n=8,039) aged 9-13 years from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) StudySM. Participants showed global increases in N0 and ND across WM with age. When controlling for global RSI measures (averaged across WM), we found smaller age-related associations in frontal regions, reflective of more protracted development of frontal WM. Moreover, variability in the development of restricted diffusion in subcortical regions and along particular gray-white matter boundaries was independent of the global developmental effect. Using the ABCD sample, we have unprecedented statistical power to estimate developmental effects with high precision. Our analyses reveal spatially-varying maturational changes for different regions, independent of global changes. This non-uniformity may reflect age-dependent development of distinct cognitive and behavioral processes.

12 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined associations between brain structure (cortical metrics and white matter microstructural integrity) and depression ratings (from caregiver and child), in a large sample (N = 8634) of early adolescents (9 to 11 years old) from the US-based, Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study®.

11 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article examined whether childhood psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are associated with several psychopathology-related polygenic scores (PGSs) and additionally examined possible neural and behavioral mechanisms.

8 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Mice adds new functionality for imputing multilevel data, automatic predictor selection, data handling, post-processing imputed values, specialized pooling routines, model selection tools, and diagnostic graphs.
Abstract: The R package mice imputes incomplete multivariate data by chained equations. The software mice 1.0 appeared in the year 2000 as an S-PLUS library, and in 2001 as an R package. mice 1.0 introduced predictor selection, passive imputation and automatic pooling. This article documents mice, which extends the functionality of mice 1.0 in several ways. In mice, the analysis of imputed data is made completely general, whereas the range of models under which pooling works is substantially extended. mice adds new functionality for imputing multilevel data, automatic predictor selection, data handling, post-processing imputed values, specialized pooling routines, model selection tools, and diagnostic graphs. Imputation of categorical data is improved in order to bypass problems caused by perfect prediction. Special attention is paid to transformations, sum scores, indices and interactions using passive imputation, and to the proper setup of the predictor matrix. mice can be downloaded from the Comprehensive R Archive Network. This article provides a hands-on, stepwise approach to solve applied incomplete data problems.

10,234 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex into standard gyral-based neuroanatomical regions is both anatomically valid and reliable and may be useful for both morphometric and functional studies of the cerebral cortex.

9,940 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low, and the consequences include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results.
Abstract: A study with low statistical power has a reduced chance of detecting a true effect, but it is less well appreciated that low power also reduces the likelihood that a statistically significant result reflects a true effect. Here, we show that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low. The consequences of this include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results. There are also ethical dimensions to this problem, as unreliable research is inefficient and wasteful. Improving reproducibility in neuroscience is a key priority and requires attention to well-established but often ignored methodological principles.

5,683 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jacob Cohen1
TL;DR: The application of positron emis sion tomography (PEM) to the study of panic disorder was discussed in this paper, where a focal brain abnormal ity in panic disorder, a severe form of anxiety, was discussed.
Abstract: pression, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 51, 61-69 (1990). 11. L.R. Baxter, Jr., J.M. Schwartz, B.H. Guze, J.C. Mazziotta, M.P. Szuba, K. Bergman, A. Alazraki, C.E. Selin, H.K. Freng, P. Munford, and M.E. Phelps, Obsessive-compulsive disorder vs. Tourette's disorder: Differential function in subdivi sions of the neostriatum, paper presented at the an nual meeting of the American College of Neuropsy chopharmacology, San Juan, Puerto Rico (December 1991). 12. E.M. Reiman, M.E. Raichle, F.K. Butler, P. Herscovitch, and E. Robins, A focal brain abnormal ity in panic disorder, a severe form of anxiety, Na ture, 310, 683-685 (1984); E.M. Reiman, M.E. Ra ichle, E. Robins, F.K. Butler, P. Herscovitch, P. Fox, and J. Perlmutter, The application of positron emis sion tomography to the study of panic disorder, American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 469-477 (1986); T.E. Nordahl, W.E. Semple, M. Gross, T.A. Mellman, M.B. Stein, P. Goyer, A.C. King, T.W. Uhde, and R.M. Cohen, Cerebral glucose metabolic differences in patients with panic disorder, Neuro psychopharmacology, 3, 261-272 (1990).

5,387 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2005-Chance
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research and conclude that the probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientifi c fi eld.
Abstract: Summary There is increasing concern that most current published research fi ndings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientifi c fi eld. In this framework, a research fi nding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a fi eld are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater fl exibility in designs, defi nitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater fi nancial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientifi c fi eld in chase of statistical signifi cance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientifi c fi elds, claimed research fi ndings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research. It can be proven that most claimed research fi ndings are false.

4,999 citations

Related Papers (5)
Donald J. Hagler, Sean N. Hatton, M. Daniela Cornejo, Carolina Makowski, Damien A. Fair, Anthony Steven Dick, Matthew T. Sutherland, B. J. Casey, M Deanna, Michael P. Harms, Richard Watts, James M. Bjork, Hugh Garavan, Laura Hilmer, Christopher J. Pung, Chelsea S. Sicat, Joshua M. Kuperman, Hauke Bartsch, Feng Xue, Mary M. Heitzeg, Angela R. Laird, Thanh T. Trinh, Raul Gonzalez, Susan F. Tapert, Michael C. Riedel, Lindsay M. Squeglia, Luke W. Hyde, Monica D. Rosenberg, Eric Earl, Katia D. Howlett, Fiona C. Baker, Mary E. Soules, Jazmin Diaz, Octavio Ruiz de Leon, Wesley K. Thompson, Michael C. Neale, Megan M. Herting, Elizabeth R. Sowell, Ruben P. Alvarez, Samuel W. Hawes, Mariana Sanchez, Jerzy Bodurka, Florence J. Breslin, Amanda Sheffield Morris, Martin P. Paulus, W. Kyle Simmons, Jonathan R. Polimeni, Andre van der Kouwe, Andrew S. Nencka, Kevin M. Gray, Carlo Pierpaoli, John A. Matochik, Antonio Noronha, Will M. Aklin, Kevin P. Conway, Meyer D. Glantz, Elizabeth Hoffman, Roger Little, Marsha F. Lopez, Vani Pariyadath, Susan R.B. Weiss, Dana L. Wolff-Hughes, Rebecca DelCarmen-Wiggins, Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing, Oscar Miranda-Dominguez, Bonnie J. Nagel, Anders Perrone, Darrick Sturgeon, Aimee Goldstone, Adolf Pfefferbaum, Kilian M. Pohl, Devin Prouty, Kristina A. Uban, Susan Y. Bookheimer, Mirella Dapretto, Adriana Galván, Kara Bagot, Jay N. Giedd, M. Alejandra Infante, Joanna Jacobus, Kevin Patrick, Paul D. Shilling, Rahul S. Desikan, Yi Li, Leo P. Sugrue, Marie T. Banich, Naomi P. Friedman, John K. Hewitt, Christian J. Hopfer, Joseph T. Sakai, Jody Tanabe, Linda B. Cottler, Sara Jo Nixon, Linda Chang, Christine C. Cloak, Thomas Ernst, Gloria Reeves, David N. Kennedy, Steve Heeringa, Scott Peltier, John E. Schulenberg, Chandra Sripada, Robert A. Zucker, William G. Iacono, Monica Luciana, Finnegan J. Calabro, Duncan B. Clark, David A. Lewis, Beatriz Luna, Claudiu Schirda, Tufikameni Brima, John J. Foxe, Edward G. Freedman, Daniel W. Mruzek, Michael J. Mason, Rebekah S. Huber, Erin McGlade, Andrew P. Prescot, Perry F. Renshaw, Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd, Nicholas Allgaier, Julie A. Dumas, Masha Y. Ivanova, Alexandra Potter, Paul Florsheim, Christine L. Larson, Krista M. Lisdahl, Michael E. Charness, Michael E. Charness, Michael E. Charness, Bernard F. Fuemmeler, John M. Hettema, Hermine H. Maes, Joel L. Steinberg, Andrey P. Anokhin, Paul E.A. Glaser, Andrew C. Heath, Pamela A. F. Madden, Arielle R. Baskin-Sommers, R. Todd Constable, Steven Grant, Gayathri J. Dowling, Sandra A. Brown, Terry L. Jernigan, Anders M. Dale