Mechanisms of change for interventions aimed at improving the wellbeing, mental health and resilience of children and adolescents affected by war and armed conflict: a systematic review of reviews
Tania Bosqui,Bassam Marshoud +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The poor quality of supporting evidence limits what can be inferred from this review’s findings, but serves to highlight clinically informed mechanisms of change for existing and widely used non-specialist interventions in the field, which urgently need rigorous scientific testing to inform their continued practice.Abstract:
Despite increasing research and clinical interest in delivering psychosocial interventions for children affected by war, little research has been conducted on the underlying mechanisms of change associated with these interventions. This review aimed to identify these processes in order to inform existing interventions and highlight research gaps. A systematic review of reviews was conducted drawing from academic databases (PubMed, PILOTS, Cochrane Library for Systematic Reviews) and field resources (e.g. Medecins Sans Frontieres and the Psychosocial Centre of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies), with extracted data analysed using Thematic Content Analysis. Thirteen reviews of psychosocial or psychological interventions for children and adolescents (< 25 years old) affected by war, armed conflict or political violence were identified, covering over 30 countries worldwide. Qualitative analysis identified 16 mechanisms of change, one of which was an adverse mechanism. Themes included protection from harm, play, community and family capacity building, strengthening relationships with caregivers, improved emotional regulation, therapeutic rapport, trauma processing, and cognitive restructuring; with the adverse mechanism relating to the pathologising of normal reactions. However, only 4 mechanisms were supported by strong empirical evidence, with only moderate or poor quality evidence supporting the other mechanisms. The poor quality of supporting evidence limits what can be inferred from this review’s findings, but serves to highlight clinically informed mechanisms of change for existing and widely used non-specialist interventions in the field, which urgently need rigorous scientific testing to inform their continued practice.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.
TL;DR: The findings show that COVID-19 has an impact on youth mental health and is particularly associated with depression and anxiety in adolescent cohorts, and the methodological quality of future research should be drastically improved.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fostering Resilience in Children: The Essential Role of Healthcare Professionals and Families
Massimo Pettoello-Mantovani,Tudor Lucian Pop,Julije Meštrović,Pietro Ferrara,Ida Giardino,Angel Carrasco-Sanz,Luigi Nigri,Leyla Namazova-Baranova,Mehmet Vural,Fügen Çullu Çokuğraş +9 more
TL;DR: The relationship between resilience and health is outlined to facilitate the ability of children and adolescents to discover and use their own strengths and resources to better cope with adversities, and most importantly to reduce the possible long-term effects of negative events in life.
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic review of factors associated with quality of life of asylum seekers and refugees in high-income countries
TL;DR: Key findings were that having established social networks and social integration were associated with higher QoL, whereas having mental disorders was strongly associated with reduced QOL, and more research is needed into physical and environmental predictors and correlates ofQoL.
Journal ArticleDOI
War and conflict: addressing the psychosocial needs of child refugees
TL;DR: For many children under the age of 8, a life of war and conflict is all they know as discussed by the authors, and since 2016, over 32 million children have been displaced from their homes mostly due to war and conflicts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Impact of spiritual beliefs and faith-based interventions on diabetes management.
TL;DR: The majority of the relationship studies showed positive relationships, while efficacy studies showed a high efficacy of interventions in faith-based approaches, but none of the studies clearly reported the mechanisms of change or modality of operation in a FBI that can serve as a model across culture and context.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.