scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Mechanisms of DNA Transposition

01 Jan 2015-Microbiology spectrum (American Society of Microbiology)-Vol. 3, Iss: 2, pp 531-553
TL;DR: The more-recently characterized single-stranded DNA transposases provide insight into how an ancient HUH domain fold has been adapted for transposition to accomplish excision and then site-specific integration.
Abstract: DNA transposases use a limited repertoire of structurally and mechanistically distinct nuclease domains to catalyze the DNA strand breaking and rejoining reactions that comprise DNA transposition. Here, we review the mechanisms of the four known types of transposition reactions catalyzed by (1) RNase H-like transposases (also known as DD(E/D) enzymes); (2) HUH single-stranded DNA transposases; (3) serine transposases; and (4) tyrosine transposases. The large body of accumulated biochemical and structural data, particularly for the RNase H-like transposases, has revealed not only the distinguishing features of each transposon family, but also some emerging themes that appear conserved across all families. The more-recently characterized single-stranded DNA transposases provide insight into how an ancient HUH domain fold has been adapted for transposition to accomplish excision and then site-specific integration. The serine and tyrosine transposases are structurally and mechanistically related to their cousins, the serine and tyrosine site-specific recombinases, but have to date been less intensively studied. These types of enzymes are particularly intriguing as in the context of site-specific recombination they require strict homology between recombining sites, yet for transposition can catalyze the joining of transposon ends to form an excised circle and then integration into a genomic site with much relaxed sequence specificity.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The characteristics of the major types of mobile genetic elements involved in acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria are outlined, focusing on the so-called ESKAPEE group of organisms, which have become the most problematic hospital pathogens.
Abstract: SUMMARY Strains of bacteria resistant to antibiotics, particularly those that are multiresistant, are an increasing major health care problem around the world. It is now abundantly clear that both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria are able to meet the evolutionary challenge of combating antimicrobial chemotherapy, often by acquiring preexisting resistance determinants from the bacterial gene pool. This is achieved through the concerted activities of mobile genetic elements able to move within or between DNA molecules, which include insertion sequences, transposons, and gene cassettes/integrons, and those that are able to transfer between bacterial cells, such as plasmids and integrative conjugative elements. Together these elements play a central role in facilitating horizontal genetic exchange and therefore promote the acquisition and spread of resistance genes. This review aims to outline the characteristics of the major types of mobile genetic elements involved in acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, focusing on the so-called ESKAPEE group of organisms (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., and Escherichia coli), which have become the most problematic hospital pathogens.

1,162 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: SMART version 9 contains manually curated models for more than 1300 protein domains, with a topical set of 68 new models added since the last update article, greatly increasing the total number of annotated domains and other protein features available in architecture analysis mode.
Abstract: SMART (Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool) is a web resource (https://smart.embl.de) for the identification and annotation of protein domains and the analysis of protein domain architectures. SMART version 9 contains manually curated models for more than 1300 protein domains, with a topical set of 68 new models added since our last update article (1). All the new models are for diverse recombinase families and subfamilies and as a set they provide a comprehensive overview of mobile element recombinases namely transposase, integrase, relaxase, resolvase, cas1 casposase and Xer like cellular recombinase. Further updates include the synchronization of the underlying protein databases with UniProt (2), Ensembl (3) and STRING (4), greatly increasing the total number of annotated domains and other protein features available in architecture analysis mode. Furthermore, SMART's vector-based protein display engine has been extended and updated to use the latest web technologies and the domain architecture analysis components have been optimized to handle the increased number of protein features available.

898 citations


Cites background from "Mechanisms of DNA Transposition"

  • ...For this purpose, we bring together a comprehensive set of 68 domains that cover five major recombinase families namely transposase––DDE (8), relaxase––HUH (9), casposase––cas1 (10), (resolvase-) serine and (integrase-) tyrosine recombinase (11)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Koonin et al. as mentioned in this paper provided their perspectives on how recent evidence points to tight evolutionary connections between MGEs and defence systems that reach far beyond the proverbial arms race.
Abstract: All cellular life forms are afflicted by diverse genetic parasites, including viruses and other types of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and have evolved multiple, diverse defence systems that protect them from MGE assault via different mechanisms. Here, we provide our perspectives on how recent evidence points to tight evolutionary connections between MGEs and defence systems that reach far beyond the proverbial arms race. Defence systems incur a fitness cost for the hosts; therefore, at least in prokaryotes, horizontal mobility of defence systems, mediated primarily by MGEs, is essential for their persistence. Moreover, defence systems themselves possess certain features of selfish elements. Common components of MGEs, such as site-specific nucleases, are ‘guns for hire’ that can also function as parts of defence mechanisms and are often shuttled between MGEs and defence systems. Thus, evolutionary and molecular factors converge to mould the multifaceted, inextricable connection between MGEs and anti-MGE defence systems. Incessant encounters of all cellular life forms with mobile genetic elements (MGEs) have driven the evolution of diverse defence mechanisms, including CRISPR–Cas and restriction–modification systems. In this Perspective, Koonin, Makarova, Wolf and Krupovic describe the surprisingly intricate interplay between MGEs and host defence systems. Not only do defence systems commonly show high horizontal mobility but many molecular components are ‘guns for hire’ that have been co-opted by defence systems from MGEs and vice versa.

137 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of the current picture of TE classification and evolutionary relationships is presented, updating the diversity of TE types uncovered in sequenced genomes.
Abstract: In recent years, much attention has been paid to comparative genomic studies of transposable elements (TEs) and the ensuing problems of their identification, classification, and annotation. Different approaches and diverse automated pipelines are being used to catalogue and categorize mobile genetic elements in the ever-increasing number of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, with little or no connectivity between different domains of life. Here, an overview of the current picture of TE classification and evolutionary relationships is presented, updating the diversity of TE types uncovered in sequenced genomes. A tripartite TE classification scheme is proposed to account for their replicative, integrative, and structural components, and the need to expand in vitro and in vivo studies of their structural and biological properties is emphasized. Bioinformatic studies have now become front and center of novel TE discovery, and experimental pursuits of these discoveries hold great promise for both basic and applied science.

83 citations


Additional excerpts

  • ...[24, 25] focused on the same four types of transposases, as specified by the chemistry of the transpos-...

    [...]

Journal Article
TL;DR: The mechanism by which mariner, a eukaryotic transposable element, performs DNA cleavage is examined and it is shown that the nontransferred strand is cleaved initially, unlike prokaryotictransposons which cleave the transferred strand first.

80 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
14 Nov 1997-Cell
TL;DR: Sleeping Beauty is an active DNA-transposon system from vertebrates for genetic transformation and insertional mutagenesis, and it mediates precise cut-and-paste transposition in fish as well as in mouse and human cells.

1,397 citations


"Mechanisms of DNA Transposition" refers background in this paper

  • ...Sleeping Beauty, a resurrected vertebrate transposase of the Tc1/mariner family (117), is also proposed to form a tetrameric transpososome (118)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Mar 2002-Cell
TL;DR: Artemis forms a complex with the 469 kDa DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) in the absence of DNA to permit enzymatic activities that are critical for the hairpin-opening step of V(D)J recombination and for the 5' and 3' overhang processing in nonhomologous DNA end joining.

1,171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The mechanism postulates that chemical catalysis is facilitated by two divalent metal ions 3.9 A apart, as in phosphoryl transfer reactions catalyzed by protein enzymes, such as the 3',5'-exonuclease of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I.
Abstract: A mechanism is proposed for the RNA-catalyzed reactions involved in RNA splicing and RNase P hydrolysis of precursor tRNA. The mechanism postulates that chemical catalysis is facilitated by two divalent metal ions 3.9 A apart, as in phosphoryl transfer reactions catalyzed by protein enzymes, such as the 3',5'-exonuclease of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. One metal ion activates the attacking water or sugar hydroxyl, while the other coordinates and stabilizes the oxyanion leaving group. Both ions act as Lewis acids and stabilize the expected pentacovalent transition state. The symmetry of a two-metal-ion catalytic site fits well with the known reaction pathway of group I self-splicing introns and can also be reconciled with emerging data on group II self-splicing introns, the spliceosome, and RNase P. The role of the RNA is to position the two catalytic metal ions and properly orient the substrates via three specific binding sites.

1,089 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review focuses on DNA-mediated or class 2 transposons and emphasizes how this class of elements is distinguished from other types of mobile elements in terms of their structure, amplification dynamics, and genomic effect.
Abstract: Transposable elements are mobile genetic units that exhibit broad diversity in their structure and transposition mechanisms. Transposable elements occupy a large fraction of many eukaryotic genomes and their movement and accumulation represent a major force shaping the genes and genomes of almost all organisms. This review focuses on DNA-mediated or class 2 transposons and emphasizes how this class of elements is distinguished from other types of mobile elements in terms of their structure, amplification dynamics, and genomic effect. We provide an up-to-date outlook on the diversity and taxonomic distribution of all major types of DNA transposons in eukaryotes, including Helitrons and Mavericks. We discuss some of the evolutionary forces that influence their maintenance and diversification in various genomic environments. Finally, we highlight how the distinctive biological features of DNA transposons have contributed to shape genome architecture and led to the emergence of genetic innovations in different eukaryotic lineages.

1,040 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The refined crystal structures of the large proteolytic fragment (Klenow fragment) of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and its complexes with a deoxynucleoside monophosphate product and a single‐stranded DNA substrate offer a detailed picture of an editing 3′‐5′ exonuclease active site.
Abstract: The refined crystal structures of the large proteolytic fragment (Klenow fragment) of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and its complexes with a deoxynucleoside monophosphate product and a single-stranded DNA substrate offer a detailed picture of an editing 3'-5' exonuclease active site. The structures of these complexes have been refined to R-factors of 0.18 and 0.19 at 2.6 and 3.1 A resolution respectively. The complex with a thymidine tetranucleotide complex shows numerous hydrophobic and hydrogen-bonding interactions between the protein and an extended tetranucleotide that account for the ability of this enzyme to denature four nucleotides at the 3' end of duplex DNA. The structures of these complexes provide details that support and extend a proposed two metal ion mechanism for the 3'-5' editing exonuclease reaction that may be general for a large family of phosphoryltransfer enzymes. A nucleophilic attack on the phosphorous atom of the terminal nucleotide is postulated to be carried out by a hydroxide ion that is activated by one divalent metal, while the expected pentacoordinate transition state and the leaving oxyanion are stabilized by a second divalent metal ion that is 3.9 A from the first. Virtually all aspects of the pretransition state substrate complex are directly seen in the structures, and only very small changes in the positions of phosphate atoms are required to form the transition state.

1,020 citations