Microbial abundance and composition influence litter decomposition response to environmental change
read more
Citations
Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems
Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition
Temporal dynamics of biotic and abiotic drivers of litter decomposition
Litter quality and environmental controls of home-field advantage effects on litter decomposition
Decomposition responses to climate depend on microbial community composition.
References
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers:
An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Related Papers (5)
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.
Microbial stress‐response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function
Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. How long does the legacy effect last?
The duration of this legacy effect implies that reduced rainfall in any given winter is likely to constrain litter decomposition for the next 11 months.
Q3. What species of grass did the site dominated in spring 2010?
In spring 2010, the site was dominated by the annual grass genera Avena, Bromus, and Lolium; the annual forb genera Erodium and Lupinus; and the native perennial grass Nassella pulchra.
Q4. What was the effect of the grinding of the microbial inoculum on the fun?
Fungal hyphae in particular were likely disrupted by the grinding of the microbial inoculum, possibly resulting in altered fungal biomass and community composition.
Q5. Why does teasing apart these mechanisms require independent manipulation of abiotic conditions and biological communities?
Because physiological responses and indirect processes can occur simultaneously, teasing apart these mechanisms requires independent manipulation of abiotic conditions and biological communities.
Q6. What is the role of microbial communities in influencing environmental change?
For some processes such as litter decomposition, changes in both plant and microbial communities may contribute to the environmental response.
Q7. How long did the extract be incubated?
The extract was pushed through a 2.7-lm GF/D syringe filter to remove large particles, stained with SYBR Green (13), and incubated for 15 min at 208C in the dark.
Q8. Why was litter origin additive in the drought plots?
Because there were nointeractions, plot environment and microbial origineffects were essentially additive in June, meaning thatlitter in the drought plots with drought-derived microbeslost only 13% of its mass compared to 24% mass loss inthe control plots with control-derived microbes (Fig.3D).
Q9. What was the effect of litter origin on bacterial densities?
Drought-derived litter had significant negative effects on bacterial densities, with declines .50% on all dates (P , 0.001 for litter origin effect, overall ANOVA; Fig. 4F).
Q10. What is the history of the microbial community in the Kansas grassland study?
A historical legacy of precipitation manipulation was observed with fungal : bacterial ratios and soil respiration in a Kansas, USA, grassland study (Evans and Wallenstein 2012).
Q11. How many counts were reported in the stained extracts?
Particles in stained extracts and unstained controls were counted by flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6; BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA), and cell densities are reported as the number of stained counts minus unstained counts per gram dry litter.
Q12. What is the role of microbial communities in the decomposition of plant litter?
especially fungi and bacteria, play a major role in the decomposition of plant litter (Waksman 1927), it is not clear how the environmental responses of microbial communities will ultimately affect decomposition in most ecosystems (Hättenschwiler et al. 2005, Gessner et al. 2010).