Microfluidic actuation by modulation of surface stresses
Summary (3 min read)
Introduction
- SINCE THE eighties, the resonance method to improve thegain of printed antennas has been well documented [1]–[3].
- Frequency selective surfaces (FSS) [13] based on the Fabry-Perot effect [14] have also been proposed as an alternative to dielectric EBGs for gain enhancement.
- The distance between the FSS superstrate and the ground plane of the antenna, which determines the resonant frequency, still needs to be about of the resonant frequency of the resonator.
II. META-SURFACE DESIGN
- During the recent years, several double negative materials (DNG) have been designed by different authors [23]–[25] several of them based on the topology proposed by [26], i.e., a combination of split ring resonators (SRRs) and wires.
- The meta-surface under study is based on the unit cell proposed by Prof. Ziolkowski in [25].
- The material selected to fabricate the layers was RT/Duroid 5880, a low loss dielectric characterized by the parameters , loss tangent , thickness 0.254 mm and copper cladding 70 on both faces.
- The transmission and reflection properties of the manufactured meta-surface were tested under waveguide excitation.
- The measured results are depicted in Fig.
III. RADIATION PERFORMANCE
- As was mentioned before, this meta-surface is basically a resonant structure exhibiting pass and stop bands.
- It is formed by a finite periodic repetition of the unit cell.
- By tuning a dipole antenna to the pass band frequency of the superstrate, an in-phase resonance of the unit cells will be induced leading to a more uniform illumination of the superstrate.
- The dimensions and position of the dipole were optimized by simulating it embedded in a dielectric slab of and loaded with the superstrate.
- Fig. 4 shows the deviation of the resonant frequency of the dipole with and without superstrate with respect to the optimized configuration when the dimensions of the dipole are slightly modified.
A. Parameter
- The parameter of the dipole with the superstrate was measured by using a network analyzer (Marconi 6210 Reflection Analyzer).
- Based on the simulation optimization process the dipole was placed just above the superstrate.
- The set-up for the measurements is shown in Fig.
- The influence of the meta-surface in the impedance matching of the dipole was analyzed and measured by varying the number of periods of the superstrate in the x direction from 4 to 12.
- As expected, an impedance matching better than 12 dB with a resonant frequency around 11.1 GHz and a deviation smaller than 3.5% with respect to the central frequency has been obtained.
B. Resonant Frequency
- Fig. 7 shows the dependence of the resonant frequency (minimum ) of the configuration (meta-surface + dipole) and the frequency of maximum gain at boresight with the number of cells of the superstrate.
- The process of deriving the gain will be explained in the next section.
- It can be observed that both parameters do not exactly coincide, but there is a slight frequency shift between them.
- A similar tendency was obtained in both cases; as the number of cells increases, the resonant frequency decreases varying from 11.19 GHz in the case of 4 cells to 10.9 GHz in the case of 12 cells [this agrees with the result obtained with the waveguide measurements (see Fig. 2)].
- The resonant frequency curve flattens for larger superstrates since the meta-surface trends to behave as a more uniform media resonating at 10.9 GHz instead of a set of single scatterers.
C. Gain
- In order to characterize the different configurations in terms of absolute-gain, the two-antenna method described in [27] was followed.
- The gain of the radiating configurations was measured in an anechoic chamber and compared with the one of a single dipole by using a horn antenna as receiver and the dipole (with and without superstrate) as transmitter.
- The superstrate was placed close to the dipole, as in the case of the measurements, in order to maximize the power radiated at boresight.
- The set-up used for these measurements is shown in Fig.
- The reason for this is the appearance of a standing wave in the transversal direction of the configuration, which limits the maximum size of the structure that achieves large gain.
D. Radiation Pattern
- Once the frequency of maximum gain was known (see Fig. 9), the radiation patterns were measured at that frequency.
- In order to avoid reflections from the clamp and the feeding cable, the back side of the antenna was covered with the absorbing material shown in Fig. 8(b).
- The back radiation pattern (from 90 to 270 ) was not measured because of physical limitations in the test set-up (see the back side feeding network and clamp in Fig. 8).
- Fig. 11 shows the H and E-plane radiation patterns for the case of nine cells.
- The back radiation level at 180 was around 5 dB what means a front-back radiation of 10 dB.
E. Radiation Efficiency
- The radiation efficiency is defined as the ratio of the total power radiated by the antenna to the total power accepted by the antenna at its terminals during radiation.
- Following this approach, the radiation efficiency has been computed for all the configurations, (see Fig. 13 solid line), taking into account 1 dB errors in the gain measurements.
- For superstrates smaller or larger, the radiation efficiency reduces, but it always exceeds 50%.
- So, the real part of the input impedance with the sphere in place will be .
- Thus by making two impedance measurements, without and with the cap, the radiation efficiency can be determined by using (5).
F. Effective Area
- Once the maximum directivity at boresight of the configuration is obtained, the effective area of the meta-surface can be calculated by applying (6) (6) Fig. 14 shows a comparison between the effective area derived from the measurements (taking into account the errors in the measurements of the gain) and the physical area of the meta-surface.
- When the superstrate is small (4 unit cells; equal to ), it can be observed that the effective area is larger than the physical one.
- This is an artefact effect produced by the mathematical definition of the effective area when the radiating surface is not wide enough and there are not metallic walls surrounding the antenna.
- This is a known phenomena described by Balanis for dipole antennas [27] p. 83.
- For larger superstrates (from five to eight cells), the effective area is similar to the physical one, what means that the meta-surface is completely illuminated, i.e., a uniform illumination has been achieved.
IV. MULTIFREQUENCY ANTENNA CONFIGURATION
- The results obtained in the previous sections show that the physical area of the proposed structure can be used very effectively in order to enhance the radiation performance of planar antennas due to the uniform illumination of the superstrate.
- It is possible to place the same type of unit cell but with a different resonant frequency (same shape but different size) on both sides.
- In order to implement it, the unit cell explained in Section II has been scaled to be working at a higher frequency, around 12.5 GHz.
- By combining superstrates consisting of low resonant frequency (LRF) unit cells and high resonant frequency (HRF) ones, and tuning dipoles to these frequencies, the MFAA is designed.
- The MFAA studied is schematically depicted in Fig. 16.
V. CONCLUSION
- A novel implementation to enhance the radiation performances of a dipole antenna based on the use of meta-surfaces as superstrate has been presented.
- A finite uniform meta-surface has been characterized in terms of parameter, gain, radiation pattern, radiation efficiency and effective area.
- Measurements of different configurations have proven an enhancement of the gain at boresight of about 3.5 1 dB with a reduction of the H-plane endfire radiation of about 15 dB.
- For larger superstrates, the effective area does not increase since the maximum area that the dipole can illuminate has been estimated around .
- Based on this configuration, a compact multifrequency antenna array has been simulated, showing the gain enhancement and low coupling between elements.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
4,044 citations
3,307 citations
Cites background from "Microfluidic actuation by modulatio..."
...Two distinct configurations can be distinguished: drop formation and movement in small channels, which we discuss in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, and drop movements on substrates using micron-scale control of interfacial energies, which we only briefly mention (e.g., Darhuber et al. 2003)....
[...]
474 citations
Cites background from "Microfluidic actuation by modulatio..."
...2004; Darhuber et al. 2003b,c; Ford & Nadim 1994; Smith 1995; Yarin et al. 2002)....
[...]
...Inlet position at x = 0 (Darhuber et al. 2003a)....
[...]
...Darhuber et al. (2003a) examined the horizontal thermocapillary spreading of Newtonian liquids emanating from a small reservoir pad onto a wettable microstripe subject to a linear A nn u....
[...]
...…scale, , which determines the longitudinal extent of capillary deformation near the moving front for an infinitely wide film, and the pattern feature size w. Experimental measurements for a wide parameter range show excellent agreement with numerical solutions of Equation 3 (Darhuber et al. 2003a)....
[...]
...(j–l) Dodecane droplet turning a 90◦ corner ( ttotal = 164 s) (Darhuber et al. 2003b)....
[...]
466 citations
381 citations
References
4,530 citations
2,334 citations
1,471 citations
1,153 citations
443 citations