© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/518866/
NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs
wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material
on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms
and conditions of use of this material at
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access
This document is the author’s final manuscript version of the journal
article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review
process. There may be differences between this and the publisher’s
version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish
to cite from this article.
The definitive version is available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
Article (refereed) - postprint
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:
Horton, Alice A.; Dixon, Simon J. 2018. Microplastics: an introduction to
environmental transport processes. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5
(2), e1268, which has been published in final form at
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1268
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with
Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Contact CEH NORA team at
noraceh@ceh.ac.uk
The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos (‘the Trademarks’) are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and
other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner.
Microplastics: an introduction to environmental transport
1
processes
2
3
Article type: Primer
4
5
Alice A. Horton*
6
alihort@ceh.ac.uk
7
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford,
8
Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
9
10
ORCID: 0000-0001-6058-6048
11
Conflicts of interest: none
12
*Corresponding author
13
14
Simon J. Dixon
15
s.j.dixon@bham.ac.uk
16
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,
17
Birmingham, B15 2TT
18
19
ORCID: 0000-0003-3029-8007
20
Conflicts of interest: none
21
22
Abstract
23
Microplastic pollution is widespread across the globe, pervading land, water and air. These
24
environments are commonly considered independently, however in reality these are closely
25
linked. This review gives an overview of the background knowledge surrounding sources, fate
26
and transport of microplastics within the environment. We introduce a new ‘Plastic Cycle’
27
concept in order to better understand the processes influencing flux and retention of
28
microplastics between and across the wide range of environmental matrices. As microplastics
29
are a pervasive, persistent and potentially harmful pollutant, an understanding of these
30
processes will allow for assessment of exposure to better determine the likely long-term
31
ecological and human health implications of microplastic pollution.
32
33
34
Keywords: plastic pollution, plastic cycle, sediment, soil, freshwater, fate
35
1. Introduction
36
Plastic has many appealing characteristics to manufacturers and consumers, including
37
being versatile, lightweight, durable, cheap and watertight. As a result, production of plastic
38
has increased enormously since the introduction of commercially available plastics. In 1950
39
an estimated 1.7 Mt were produced,
1
with production estimates for the year 2015 ranging
40
between 322 Mt and 380 Mt.
2, 3
An estimated 8300 million metric tons (Mt) of virgin plastic has
41
been manufactured to date.
3
Today, around 40% of plastic produced is for packaging, with
42
these items generally designed for a single use before disposal.
2
Unfortunately, this surge in
43
the use of plastic has led to a massive increase in plastic items being released to the
44
environment, due to intentional or unintentional losses.
4
It is estimated that around 60% of all
45
plastics ever made have accumulated in landfill or the natural environment.
3
46
Plastic items are manufactured in all shapes and sizes, with the smallest sizes (< 5mm)
47
considered to be ‘microplastics’. Those specifically manufactured to be of this small size are
48
called ‘primary microplastics’ and are produced as ‘nurdles’ (small pellets used as a raw
49
material to make plastic products, Fig. 1), glitter and microbeads, which are added to
50
cosmetics and personal care products. Once in the environment, plastic items can break down
51
and therefore even large items may eventually form hundreds if not thousands of ‘secondary
52
microplastics’ in the form of fragments, fibres or films (Fig. 1). There are a number of
53
mechanisms by which this breakdown can occur, including mechanical degradation such as
54
road wear, tyre abrasion, physical weathering of large items and washing of synthetic textiles,
5-
55
8
chemical degradation (e.g. exposure to acids or alkalis) and UV degradation (exposure to
56
UV radiation). Biological degradation can also occur in the presence of organisms with the
57
capacity to ingest and degrade plastics, for example waxworms,
9
mealworms,
10
and some
58
microbes.
11
Additionally, over time the plasticisers added to plastics during manufacture to
59
give them their flexible and durable properties leach out, rendering the plastic brittle and more
60
susceptible to degradation.
12, 13
61
62
63
Fig 1. Images of different types of plastic particles a) pellets/nurdles, b) fibres and c) fragments. Scale
64
bars are approximate.
65
66
2. Presence and sources of microplastics within the environment
67
There are many ways in which plastics can be released to the environment, either as
68
primary microplastics or as larger plastic items (‘macroplastics’) which will break down to form
69
secondary microplastics (Fig. 2). Primary microplastics from domestic products, such as
70
microbeads, can be present in waste water and subsequently discharged to rivers, while
71
nurdles can be lost to freshwaters during production processes. Examples of secondary
72
microplastic sources include intentional release (illegal dumping), mismanaged waste (litter)
73
or unintentional losses (e.g. fishing gear and loss of shipping cargo),
14
with the magnitude of
74
different sources and pathways for microplastic release varying between the terrestrial,
75
freshwater and marine environments.
76
77
2.1. Microplastics on land
78
All plastic is manufactured on land and, other than maritime or fishing uses, it is also
79
where the majority of plastic is used in consumer products. The pathways for release of waste
80
consumer products to land include direct littering and inefficient waste management e.g. loss
81
during the waste disposal chain, industrial spillages, or release from landfill sites (Figure 2a).
15,
82
16
Modern agricultural practises make use of plastic in a variety of ways including as mulches,
83
which can degrade in situ, in addition to bale twine and wrapping which can be improperly
84
disposed of.
17
These items can degrade to form secondary microplastics within the
85
environment.
86
Microplastics may also be released directly to land along with sewage sludge applied to
87
agricultural land as a fertiliser. Wastewater treatments plants are quite effective at removing
88
microplastic particles from the wastewater stream, often with ~99% removal,
18-20
and many of
89
these particles will settle to the sludge. It is estimated that throughout Europe, between 125-
90
850 tons of microplastics per million inhabitants are added annually to agricultural soils as a
91
result of sewage sludge application.
17
Horton et al.
21
calculated that 473,000-910,000 metric
92
tonnes of plastic waste is retained within European continental environments (terrestrial and
93
freshwater) annually, which includes microplastics derived from sewage sludge, in addition to
94
predicted inputs of litter and inadequately managed waste. Where plastics are not transported
95
from land to rivers or the sea, this could lead to massive accumulation. However, few studies
96
have investigated abundance of microplastics within terrestrial environments, or linked
97
abundance to input pathways, therefore it is not currently possible to directly link accumulation
98
with specific environmental characteristics or anthropogenic activities.
99
100
2.2. Microplastics in freshwater environments
101
Freshwaters represent the most complex system regarding microplastic transport and
102
retention, as they receive microplastics from the terrestrial environment, function as conduits
103
for microplastics to the marine environment (Figure 2b), act as a means of microplastic
104
production through breakup of larger items and act as sinks retaining microplastics in
105
sediments. Additionally, ‘freshwater’ represents rivers, streams, ditches, lakes and ponds, all
106
with very different characteristics.
107
Larger plastic items can enter the freshwater environment through inadequate waste
108
disposal, either through littering or loss from landfill and transported from land via wind or
109