scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Military Versus Police Interrogations: Similarities and Differences

Allison D. Redlich
- 05 Dec 2007 - 
- Vol. 13, Iss: 4, pp 423-428
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the shared and non-shared aspects of military and police-based interrogations are described, and current events such as the war in Iraq and the increasing number of identified false confessions, warrant the empirical comparison of these two interrogation forms.
Abstract
In this article, the shared and non-shared aspects of military- and police-based interrogations are described. Current events, such as the war in Iraq and the increasing number of identified false confessions, warrant the empirical comparison of these two interrogation forms. In regard to shared characteristics, both military and police interrogations utilize psychologically oriented techniques. In regard to non-shared characteristics, the types of interrogation diverge in their main purpose (intelligence gathering vs. confession/self-incrimination), the people they question, the degree of training interrogators receive, the use of direct questions, and the permissible use of torture. Implications for innocents in military and police interrogation settings are addressed.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review

TL;DR: This article conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available empirical literature assessing the influence of accusatorial and information-gathering methods of interrogation in eliciting true and false confessions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice:

TL;DR: This paper examined the similarities and differences between interrogations in criminal and human intelligence settings, and discussed the extent to which the current empirical literature can be applied to criminal and/or human intelligence interrogations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions

TL;DR: This paper presents a meta-analysis of Google’s search strategy and results to derive conclusions about how to improve the quality of searches and increase the likelihood of finding matches.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Who, What, and Why of Human Intelligence Gathering: Self-Reported Measures of Interrogation Methods

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used an online survey to examine the frequency of use and perceived effectiveness of interrogation methods for up to 152 military and federal-level interrogators from the USA and found that rapport and relationship-building techniques were employed most often and perceived as the most effective regardless of context and intended goal.
References
More filters
Book

Influence : science and practice

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the principle of social proof in the context of Jujitsu and discuss the power of authority pressure and the dangers of blind obedience in the realm of influence.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Psychology of Confessions A Review of the Literature and Issues

TL;DR: It is argued that there is a need to reform interrogation practices that increase the risk of false confessions and recommend a policy of mandatory videotaping of all interviews and interrogations.
Book

Criminal Interrogation and Confessions

TL;DR: The Fourth Edition of Criminal Interrogation and Confessions as mentioned in this paper is the classic text for the Reid Technique of interviewing and interrogation, and it has been used successfully by thousands of criminal investigators.
Journal ArticleDOI

Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: on the dangers of presuming guilt.

TL;DR: Results indicate that a presumption of guilt sets in motion a process of behavioral confirmation by which expectations influence the interrogator'sbehavior, the suspect's behavior, and ultimately the judgments of neutral observers.
Book ChapterDOI

"You're Guilty, So Just Confess!" Cognitive and Behavioral Confirmation Biases in the Interrogation Room.

TL;DR: In this article, Van Meter suggested that individual prejudices should be left outside of the interrogation room, as a good interrogator must be impartial, and he further elaborated: "I have seen interrogators personally involved with a suspect, and they usually become very sensitive to the suspect and all that he says. This personal sensitivity often leads to harsh words and useless conversations with the suspect."
Related Papers (5)