Journal ArticleDOI
Mouvements Populaires Et Autonomisme Urbain Dans L'Asie Musulmane Du Moyen Age, Ii
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The notion of "solidarite" was introduced by I400 Ibn Halduin this article, who defined the notion of solidarite as "a degager de maniere plus generale l'existence -de tels elements autonomistes, spontanes cette fois and ne devant primitivement rien a aucune organisation officielle".Abstract:
ous avons donc vu, dans ce qui precede 1, comment des inN stitutions, qui en principe representent le gouvernement unitaire de la Communaute, peuvent en fait, par interference avec les conditions locales de leur fonctionnement, en venir 'a representer, face a ce gouvernement, un element de resistance urbaine particulariste. Inversant maintenant notre enquete, nous allons -chercher directement 'a degager de maniere plus generale l'existence -de tels elements autonomistes, spontanes cette fois et ne devant primitivement rien a aucune organisation officielle. Certaines considerations preliminaires ne seront pas inutiles. L'importance de la notion de solidarite, solidarite de groupe, 'asabiyya, dans la societe musulmane a ete mainte fois soulignee ,depuis qu'a ete remise en lumiere 2 la magistrale analyse qu'en a :faite vers I400 Ibn Halduin, sur la base des societes de lui connues. Mais derriere ce terme on evoque d'abord la solidarite de tribu, ,contrepartie des luttes entre tribus, dans l'ancien monde arabe ou dans les elements du nouveau qui ont conserve' une partie de l'ancienne structure. Plus largement aussi on pense parfois a la .solidarite generale entre croyants, ou a la solidarite vague entre les sujets d'une meme principaute, d'un m6me ensemble regional .humain, dans les cas oju une telle solidarite existe. Mais dans les -textes de la periode musulmane classique, le mot 'asabiyya au singulier ou au pluriel, casabiyydt, intervient constamment aussi pour designer des formes de solidarite entre groupes restreints aread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Islamic city, Arab city: orientalist myths and recent views
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an Islamic city, Arab city, and orientalist myths and recent views in the British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 3-18.
Book ChapterDOI
The political and dynastic history of the iranian world (a.d. 1000–1217)
TL;DR: For nearly a thousand years, Iran has generally been ruled by non-Persian dynasties, usually Turkish, but sometimes Mongol or Kurdish as discussed by the authors, which has had less effect on Iranian national psychology and literary consciousness than might be expected, for all of the alien ruling Dynasties have come from races of low cultural development and thus they have lacked the administrative expertise necessary for ruling a land of ancient settlement and civilization.
Book ChapterDOI
Dynastic and political history of the il-khāns
TL;DR: The chronology of Sultan Muhammad's first contacts with the Mongols is extremely confusing, and it is difficult and sometimes impossible to reconcile the accounts of the various authorities as mentioned in this paper. But the terms which Abaqa's emissary transmitted to Baraq were generous enough.
Journal ArticleDOI
Two European Images of Non-European Rule ∗
TL;DR: The anthropological picture of African societies is one of rule by consent when ruler and ruled are bound by ties of mutuality and interdependence, while Western students of Islamic history have emphasised the cleavage between governor and governed, the arbitrary despotism of the former and the passive acquiescence of the latter.
Book ChapterDOI
The socio-economic condition of iran under the īl-khāns
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss three periods in the socio-economic history of Iran during the Mongol dominion, ranging from the twenties of the thirteenth century to the eighties of the fourteenth century.