scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Multilevel modelling of complex survey data

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, a pseudolikelihood approach for accommodating inverse probability weights in multilevel models with an arbitrary number of levels is implemented by using adaptive quadrature, and a sandwich estimator is used to obtain standard errors that account for stratification and clustering.
Abstract
Summary. Multilevel modelling is sometimes used for data from complex surveys involving multistage sampling, unequal sampling probabilities and stratification. We consider generalized linear mixed models and particularly the case of dichotomous responses. A pseudolikelihood approach for accommodating inverse probability weights in multilevel models with an arbitrary number of levels is implemented by using adaptive quadrature. A sandwich estimator is used to obtain standard errors that account for stratification and clustering. When level 1 weights are used that vary between elementary units in clusters, the scaling of the weights becomes important. We point out that not only variance components but also regression coefficients can be severely biased when the response is dichotomous. The pseudolikelihood methodology is applied to complex survey data on reading proficiency from the American sample of the ‘Program for international student assessment’ 2000 study, using the Stata program gllamm which can estimate a wide range of multilevel and latent variable models. Performance of pseudo-maximumlikelihood with different methods for handling level 1 weights is investigated in a Monte Carlo experiment. Pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimators of (conditional) regression coefficients perform well for large cluster sizes but are biased for small cluster sizes. In contrast, estimators of marginal effects perform well in both situations. We conclude that caution must be exercised in pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimation for small cluster sizes when level 1 weights are used.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling.

TL;DR: This article compares and contrasts HLM with alternative methods including generalized estimating equations and cluster-robust standard errors and demonstrates the advantages of the alternative methods and also when HLM would be the preferred method.
Journal ArticleDOI

Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error.

TL;DR: Results are used to test the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE), showing that individual student levels of academic self-concept (L1-ASC) are positively associated with individual level achievement and negatively associated with school-average achievement—a finding with important policy implications for the way schools are structured.
Journal ArticleDOI

International Large-Scale Assessment Data: Issues in Secondary Analysis and Reporting

TL;DR: The authors outline the issues surrounding the analysis and reporting of LSA data, with a particular focus on three prominent international surveys, and make recommendations targeted at applied researchers regarding bestAnalysis and reporting practices when using these databases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fitting multilevel models in complex survey data with design weights: Recommendations

TL;DR: The performance of scaled-weighted and unweighted analyses across a variety of MLM and software programs is examined, showing minimal differences across software programs, increasing confidence in results and inferential conclusions independent of software choice.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Is It a Myth or Reality?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between student engagement and academic performance, using U.S. data of the Program for International Student Assessment 2000 and found that behavioral engagement and emotional engagement significantly predicted reading performance.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Random-effects models for longitudinal data

Nan M. Laird, +1 more
- 01 Dec 1982 - 
TL;DR: In this article, a unified approach to fitting two-stage random-effects models, based on a combination of empirical Bayes and maximum likelihood estimation of model parameters and using the EM algorithm, is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inference and missing data

Donald B. Rubin
- 01 Dec 1976 - 
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that ignoring the process that causes missing data when making sampling distribution inferences about the parameter of the data, θ, is generally appropriate if and only if the missing data are missing at random and the observed data are observed at random, and then such inferences are generally conditional on the observed pattern of missing data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models

TL;DR: In this paper, generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) are used to estimate the marginal quasi-likelihood for the mean parameters and the conditional variance for the variances, and the dispersion matrix is specified in terms of a rank deficient inverse covariance matrix.
Journal ArticleDOI

Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

TL;DR: This article discusses extensions of generalized linear models for the analysis of longitudinal data in which heterogeneity in regression parameters is explicitly modelled and uses a generalized estimating equation approach to fit both classes of models for discrete and continuous outcomes.
Book

Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a linear variance-components model for expiratory flow measurements, which is based on the Mini Wright measurements, and a three-level logistic random-intercept model.
Trending Questions (1)
What means tau00 in a multilevel modelling?

The paper does not mention the term "tau00" in relation to multilevel modeling.