scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
MonographDOI

Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science

01 Jan 2013-
TL;DR: This native american dna tribal belonging and the false promise of genetic science by, the best one, is readily available.
Abstract: Required a magnificent e-book? native american dna tribal belonging and the false promise of genetic science by , the best one! Wan na get it? Find this superb electronic book by here currently. Download or check out online is readily available. Why we are the most effective website for downloading this native american dna tribal belonging and the false promise of genetic science Naturally, you can choose the book in different documents kinds as well as media. Look for ppt, txt, pdf, word, rar, zip, as well as kindle? Why not? Obtain them below, currently!
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To properly invite you into this Special Issue, then, the authors need to say something about what they mean when they write about care.
Abstract: Care is a slippery word. Any attempt to define it will be exceeded by its multivocality in everyday and scholarly use. In its enactment, care is both necessary to the fabric of biological and social existence and notorious for the problems that it raises when it is defined, legislated, measured, and evaluated. What care looks and feels like is both context-specific and perspective-dependent. Yet, this elusiveness does not mean that it lacks importance. In our engagements with the worlds that we study, construct, and inhabit, we cannot but care: care is an essential part of being a researcher and a citizen. To properly invite you into this Special Issue, then, we need to say something about what we mean when we write about care.

303 citations


Cites background from "Native American DNA: Tribal Belongi..."

  • ...…perpetuated by reproductive and genetic technologies of the past and present (e.g. Casper, 1998; Nelson, 2013; Pollock, 2012; Reardon, 2005; TallBear, 2013); the forms of oppression and racisms propagated in the name of colonial and neocolonial science (e.g. Adams, 2002; Anderson, 2002;…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an ethnographic and theoretical critique of ontological anthropology is presented, which provides an empirical counterweight to what the ontological turn celebrates of Native worlds and what it rejects of modernity.
Abstract: What does ontological anthropology promise, what does it presume, and how does it contribute to the formatting of life in our present? Drawing from our respective fieldwork on how Indigenous alterity is coenvisioned and how the lively materiality of hydrocarbons is recognized, we develop an ethnographic and theoretical critique of ontological anthropology. This essay, then, provides an empirical counterweight to what the ontological turn celebrates of Native worlds and what it rejects of modernity. In it, we examine the methodological and conceptual investments of ontological anthropology. The figure of the ontological as commonly invoked, we argue, often narrows the areas of legitimate concern and widens the scope of acceptable disregard within social research. We chart how this paradigm's analytical focus on the future redefines the coordinates of the political as well as anthropology's relation to critique. Finally, we formulate three conceptual theses that encapsulate our criticism and open this discussion to further debate.

249 citations


Cites background from "Native American DNA: Tribal Belongi..."

  • ...Fortun, Kim 2001 Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, and New Global Orders....

    [...]

  • ...In Ecuador, shoddy drilling and disposal practices have endangered numerous Indigenous and peasant communities (Cepek 2012; Kimerling 1991; Sawyer 2004)....

    [...]

  • ...…have extended these conceptualizations in multivocal accounts, with notable examples by Joanne Barker (2011), Ned Blackhawk (2006), Jodi Byrd (2011), Kehaulani Kauanui (2008), Jean O’Brien (2010), Kim Tallbear (2013), Linda Tuhiwai Smith (1999), Dale Turner (2006), and Robert Warrior (1995)....

    [...]

  • ...Kimerling, Judith 1991 Amazon Crude....

    [...]

  • ...In recent years, scholars in critical Native studies have extended these conceptualizations in multivocal accounts, with notable examples by Joanne Barker (2011), Ned Blackhawk (2006), Jodi Byrd (2011), Kehaulani Kauanui (2008), Jean O’Brien (2010), Kim Tallbear (2013), Linda Tuhiwai Smith (1999), Dale Turner (2006), and Robert Warrior (1995)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2018
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the relationship between settler colonialism and environmental injustice, focusing on the context of Indigenous peoples' facing US domination, and propose an Anishinaabe intellectual tradition to describe an Indigenous conception of social resilience called collective continuance.
Abstract: Settler colonialism is a form of domination that violently disrupts human relationships with the environment. Settler colonialism is ecological domination, committing environmental injustice against Indigenous peoples and other groups. Focusing on the context of Indigenous peoples’ facing US domination, this article investigates philosophically one dimension of how settler colonialism commits environmental injustice. When examined ecologically, settler colonialism works strategically to undermine Indigenous peoples’ social resilience as self determining collectives. To understand the relationships connecting settler colonialism, environmental injustice, and violence, the article first engages Anishinaabe intellectual traditions to describe an Indigenous conception of social resilience called collective continuance. One way in which settler colonial violence commits environmental injustice is through strategically undermining Indigenous collective continuance. At least two kinds of environmental injustices demonstrate such violence: vicious sedimentation and insidious loops. The article seeks to contribute to knowledge of how anti-Indigenous settler colonialism and environmental injustice are connected.

206 citations


Cites background from "Native American DNA: Tribal Belongi..."

  • ...Hence, kin is not just based on birth or biology, as Indigenous studies scholars more broadly have discussed (TallBear 2013)....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
27 Jan 2020
TL;DR: The authors examine the way race and racial categories are adopted in algorithmic fairness frameworks, focusing on the history of racial categories and turning to critical race theory and sociological work on race and ethnicity to ground conceptualizations of race for fairness research, drawing on lessons from public health, biomedical research, and social survey research.
Abstract: We examine the way race and racial categories are adopted in algorithmic fairness frameworks. Current methodologies fail to adequately account for the socially constructed nature of race, instead adopting a conceptualization of race as a fixed attribute. Treating race as an attribute, rather than a structural, institutional, and relational phenomenon, can serve to minimize the structural aspects of algorithmic unfairness. In this work, we focus on the history of racial categories and turn to critical race theory and sociological work on race and ethnicity to ground conceptualizations of race for fairness research, drawing on lessons from public health, biomedical research, and social survey research. We argue that algorithmic fairness researchers need to take into account the multidimensionality of race, take seriously the processes of conceptualizing and operationalizing race, focus on social processes which produce racial inequality, and consider perspectives of those most affected by sociotechnical systems.

143 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In the special issue "Giving Back in Solidarity: A Guide for Field Research" as discussed by the authors, the thematic section is devoted to the importance of giving back in field research.
Abstract: This research note is part of the thematic section, Giving Back in Solidarity, in the special issue titled “Giving Back in Field Research,” published as Volume 10, Issue 2 in the Journal of Research Practice.

135 citations


Cites background from "Native American DNA: Tribal Belongi..."

  • ...My book, Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science (TallBear, 2013), is critical of the colonial practices that have made the concept of Native American DNA possible....

    [...]