scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Natural selection in the wild

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It is argued that the common assumption that selection is usually weak in natural populations is no longer tenable, but that natural selection is only one component of the process of evolution; natural selection can explain the change of frequencies of variants, but not their origins.
Abstract
Natural selection is an immense and important subject, yet there have been few attempts to summarize its effects on natural populations, and fewer still which discuss the problems of working with natural selection in the wild. These are the purposes of John Endler's book. In it, he discusses the methods and problems involved in the demonstration and measurement of natural selection, presents the critical evidence for its existence, and places it in an evolutionary perspective. Professor Endler finds that there are a remarkable number of direct demonstrations of selection in a wide variety of animals and plants. The distribution of observed magnitudes of selection in natural populations is surprisingly broad, and it overlaps extensively the range of values found in artificial selection. He argues that the common assumption that selection is usually weak in natural populations is no longer tenable, but that natural selection is only one component of the process of evolution; natural selection can explain the change of frequencies of variants, but not their origins.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies

TL;DR: A recent survey of capture-recapture models can be found in this article, with an emphasis on flexibility in modeling, model selection, and the analysis of multiple data sets.

Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified

TL;DR: This paper synthesizes, using a common framework, recent developments of capture-recapture models oriented to estimation of survival rates together with new ones, with an emphasis on flexibility in modeling, model selection, and the analysis of multiple data sets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive versus non‐adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments

TL;DR: It is concluded that adaptive plasticity that places populations close enough to a new phenotypic optimum for directional selection to act is the only Plasticity that predictably enhances fitness and is most likely to facilitate adaptive evolution on ecological time-scales in new environments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch.

Martin Edwards, +1 more
- 19 Aug 2004 - 
TL;DR: It is shown that not only is the marine pelagic community responding to climate changes, but also that the level of response differs throughout the community and the seasonal cycle, leading to a mismatch between trophic levels and functional groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations

TL;DR: Comparisons of estimated linear selection gradients and differentials suggest that indirect components of phenotypic selection were usually modest relative to direct components, and no evidence that stabilizing selection is stronger or more common than disruptive selection in nature.