Near Earth Asteroids with measurable Yarkovsky effect
Citations
3 citations
Cites methods from "Near Earth Asteroids with measurabl..."
...Also, I used the DE431 version of JPL’s planetary ephemerides and additional 16 massive perturbing asteroids and dwarf planet Pluto as in Del Vigna et al. (2018), and in Farnocchia et al. (2013b)....
[...]
...…(99942) Apophis computed using shorter observational arc and different Solar System models are widely published, e.g. in Vokrouhlicky et al.(2015), Farnocchia et al.(2013b), Bancelin et al.(2012), Zizka and Vokrouhlicy(2011), Krolikowska and Sitarski(2010), Krolikowska et al.(2009) and in…...
[...]
3 citations
3 citations
2 citations
References
1,692 citations
717 citations
"Near Earth Asteroids with measurabl..." refers background or methods in this paper
...This excess of retrograde rotators can be explained by the nature of resonance feeding into the inner Solar System (Bottke et al., 2002). Most of the primary NEA source regions (e.g., the 3:1 resonance, JFCs, Outer Belt, etc.) allow main belt asteroids to enter by drifting either inwards or outwards, but the m6 resonance is at the inner edge of the main belt and so asteroids can generally enter only by inwards drift, i.e., with retrograde rotation. Bottke et al. (2002) report that 37% of NEAs with absolute magnitude H < 22 arrive via m6 resonance. La Spina et al. (2004) point out that this implies 37% of NEAs have retrograde spin (via m6), plus half of the complement (via other pathways). Thus, the retrograde fraction should be 0.37 + 0.5 0.63 = 0.69, while La Spina et al. (2004) report 67% retrograde for their sample, which is dominated by large NEAs. Table 2 contains 81% retrograde rotators, which is larger than 69% and thus, at face value, appears to be inconsistent with the theory. The sample of asteroids shown in Table 2, however, is based on measured Yarkovsky mobility and is not a representative sample of the debiased NEA population as described by Bottke et al. (2002). For example, the sample is dominated by small PHAs (MOID < 0.05 AU) on fairly deep Earth-crossing orbits. We find that 9 of the 21 objects are Aten asteroids (43%), compared to the 6% fraction predicted for the debiased NEA population. Bottke et al. (2002) suggest that the majority of Atens ( 79%) should come from the innermost region of the main belt where the m6 resonance is located....
[...]
...This excess of retrograde rotators can be explained by the nature of resonance feeding into the inner Solar System (Bottke et al., 2002)....
[...]
...This excess of retrograde rotators can be explained by the nature of resonance feeding into the inner Solar System (Bottke et al., 2002). Most of the primary NEA source regions (e.g., the 3:1 resonance, JFCs, Outer Belt, etc.) allow main belt asteroids to enter by drifting either inwards or outwards, but the m6 resonance is at the inner edge of the main belt and so asteroids can generally enter only by inwards drift, i.e., with retrograde rotation. Bottke et al. (2002) report that 37% of NEAs with absolute magnitude H < 22 arrive via m6 resonance....
[...]
...This excess of retrograde rotators can be explained by the nature of resonance feeding into the inner Solar System (Bottke et al., 2002). Most of the primary NEA source regions (e.g., the 3:1 resonance, JFCs, Outer Belt, etc.) allow main belt asteroids to enter by drifting either inwards or outwards, but the m6 resonance is at the inner edge of the main belt and so asteroids can generally enter only by inwards drift, i.e., with retrograde rotation. Bottke et al. (2002) report that 37% of NEAs with absolute magnitude H < 22 arrive via m6 resonance. La Spina et al. (2004) point out that this implies 37% of NEAs have retrograde spin (via m6), plus half of the complement (via other pathways). Thus, the retrograde fraction should be 0.37 + 0.5 0.63 = 0.69, while La Spina et al. (2004) report 67% retrograde for their sample, which is dominated by large NEAs. Table 2 contains 81% retrograde rotators, which is larger than 69% and thus, at face value, appears to be inconsistent with the theory. The sample of asteroids shown in Table 2, however, is based on measured Yarkovsky mobility and is not a representative sample of the debiased NEA population as described by Bottke et al. (2002). For example, the sample is dominated by small PHAs (MOID < 0....
[...]
...Bottke et al. (2002) report that 37% of NEAs arrive via ν6 resonance....
[...]
661 citations
"Near Earth Asteroids with measurabl..." refers background in this paper
...It is well known that nongravitational forces should be considered as important as collisions and gravitational perturbations for the overall understanding of asteroid evolution (Bottke et al., 2006)....
[...]
480 citations
364 citations