NERD: A framework for evaluating named entity recognition tools in the Web of data
Citations
130 citations
Cites background or methods from "NERD: A framework for evaluating na..."
...This set of evaluations is further used to compute statistics about precision scores for each tool, with the goal to highlight strengths and weaknesses and to compare them (Rizzo and Troncy, 2011b)....
[...]
...The main purpose of this interface is to enable a human user to assess the quality of the extraction results collected by those tools (Rizzo and Troncy, 2011a)....
[...]
118 citations
64 citations
51 citations
Cites background from "NERD: A framework for evaluating na..."
...[45] have also validated the performance of AlchemyAPI on a number of datasets and in different contexts: Rizzo and Troncy found out that AlchemyAPI is better at extracting named entities and categorizing them than other semantic entity extractors [44]—such as, Zemanta [46], OpenCalais [47], Extractiv [48] and DBpedia Spotlight [49]....
[...]
41 citations
Cites background from "NERD: A framework for evaluating na..."
...The combination can be performed based on the agreement between two or more of the involved APIs....
[...]