New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration
01 Apr 2002-Journal of Operations Management (No longer published by Elsevier)-Vol. 20, Iss: 2, pp 135-157
TL;DR: The management of new service development (NSD) has become an important competitive concern in many service industries as discussed by the authors, however, NSD remains among the least studied and understood topics in the service management literature.
Abstract: The management of new service development (NSD) has become an important competitive concern in many service industries. However, NSD remains among the least studied and understood topics in the service management literature. As a result, our current understanding of the critical resources and activities to develop new services is inadequate given NSD’s importance as a service competitiveness driver. Until recently, the generally accepted principle behind NSD was that “new services happen” rather than occurring through formal development processes. Recent efforts to address this debate have been inconclusive. Thus, additional research is needed to validate or discredit the belief that new services happen as a result of intuition, flair, and luck. Relying upon the general distinctions between research exploitation and exploration, this paper describes areas in NSD research that deserve further leveraging and refinement (i.e. exploitation) and identifies areas requiring discovery or new study (i.e. exploration). We discuss the critical substantive and research design issues facing NSD scholars such as defining new services, choice in focusing on the NSD process or performance (or both), and specification of unit of analysis. We also examine what can be exploited from the study of new product development to further understanding of NSD. Finally, we explore one important area for future NSD research exploration: the impact of the Internet on the design and development of services. We offer research opportunities and research challenges in the study of NSD throughout the paper.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: Product service systems (PSS) have been heralded as one of the most effective instruments for moving society towards a resource-efficient, circular economy and creating a much needed "resource revolution" as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Since the 1990s, Product Service Systems (PSS) have been heralded as one of the most effective instruments for moving society towards a resource-efficient, circular economy and creating a much-needed ‘resource revolution’. This paper reviews the literature on PSS in the last decade and compares the findings with those from an earlier review in this journal in 2006. Close to 300 relevant papers were identified, over 140 of which have been referenced in this review. Research in the field of PSS has become more prolific, with the output of refereed papers quadrupling since 2000, while on average scientific output has only doubled. PSS has also become embedded in a wider range of science fields (such as manufacturing, ICT, business management, and design) and geographical regions (Asia now produces more papers than Europe). The literature of the last seven years has refined insights with regard to the design of PSS, as well as their business and environmental benefits, and confirmed the definitions and PSS concepts already available in 2006. A major contribution of the recent literature is research into how firms have implemented PSS in their organization and what the key success factors and issues that require special attention are (such as a focus on product availability for clients; an emphasis on diversity in terms of services provided rather than the range of products; and the need for staff to possess both knowledge of the product and relationship management skills). The reasons why PSS have nonetheless still not been widely implemented, particularly in the B2C context, seem to have already been explained fairly well in the literature available in 2006. For consumers, having control over things, artifacts, and life itself is one of the most valued attributes. PSS are often less accessible, or have less intangible value, than the competing product, in part because PSS usually do not allow consumers as much behavioral freedom or even leave them with the impression that the PSS provider could prescribe how they should behave.
1,345 citations
Posted Content•
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which they classify under five research fields: consumer response to innovation, including attempts to measure consumer innovative-ness, models of new product growth, and recent ideas on network externalities.
Abstract: Innovation is one of the most important issues in business research today. It has been studied in many independent research traditions. Our understanding and study of innovation can benefit from an integrative review of these research traditions. In so doing, we identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which we classify under five research fields: - Consumer response to innovation, including attempts to measure consumer innovative-ness, models of new product growth, and recent ideas on network externalities - Organizations and innovation, which are increasingly important as product development becomes more complex and tools more effective but demanding - Market entry strategies, which includes recent research on technology revolution, exten-sive marketing science research on strategies for entry, and issues of portfolio manage-ment - Prescriptive techniques for product development processes, which have been transformed through global pressures, increasingly accurate customer input, web-based communica-tion for dispersed and global product design, and new tools for dealing with complexity over time and across product lines - Defending against market entry and capturing the rewards of innovating, which includes extensive marketing science research on strategies of defense, managing through metrics and rewards to entrants For each topic, we summarize key concepts and highlight research challenges. For pre-scriptive research topics, we also review current thinking and applications. For descriptive top-ics, we review key findings.
1,040 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which they classify under five research fields: consumer response to innovation, including attempts to measure consumer innovativeness, models of new product growth, and recent ideas on network externalities; organizations and innovation, which are increasingly important as product development becomes more complex and tools more effective but demanding.
Abstract: Innovation is one of the most important issues in business research today. It has been studied in many independent research traditions. Our understanding and study of innovation can benefit from an integrative review of these research traditions. In so doing, we identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which we classify under five research fields:
Consumer response to innovation, including attempts to measure consumer innovativeness, models of new product growth, and recent ideas on network externalities; Organizations and innovation, which are increasingly important as product development becomes more complex and tools more effective but demanding;.
Market entry strategies, which includes recent research on technology revolution, extensive marketing science research on strategies for entry, and issues of portfolio management;
Prescriptive techniques for product development processes, which have been transformed through global pressures, increasingly accurate customer input, Web-based communication for dispersed and global product design, and new tools for dealing with complexity over time and across product lines;
Defending against market entry and capturing the rewards of innovating, which includes extensive marketing science research on strategies of defense, managing through metrics, and rewards to entrants.
For each topic, we summarize key concepts and highlight research challenges. For prescriptive research topics, we also review current thinking and applications. For descriptive topics, we review key findings.
956 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a framework for conducting case studies examining how smart cities were being implemented in San Francisco and Seoul Metropolitan City by integrating various practical perspectives with a consideration of smart city characteristics taken from the literature.
Abstract: This study aims to shed light on the process of building an effective smart city by integrating various practical perspectives with a consideration of smart city characteristics taken from the literature We developed a framework for conducting case studies examining how smart cities were being implemented in San Francisco and Seoul Metropolitan City The study's empirical results suggest that effective, sustainable smart cities emerge as a result of dynamic processes in which public and private sector actors coordinate their activities and resources on an open innovation platform The different yet complementary linkages formed by these actors must further be aligned with respect to their developmental stage and embedded cultural and social capabilities Our findings point to eight ‘stylized facts’, based on both quantitative and qualitative empirical results that underlie the facilitation of an effective smart city In elaborating these facts, the paper offers useful insights to managers seeking to improve the delivery of smart city developmental projects
622 citations
Cites background from "New service development: areas for ..."
...[36] borrow March [33] notion of exploitation (meaning ‘persuading further leveraging and refinement’) and exploration (meaning the ‘identification of newareas or domains...
[...]
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the relation between the exploration of new possibilities and the exploitation of old certainties in organizational learning and examine some complications in allocating resources between the two, particularly those introduced by the distribution of costs and benefits across time and space.
Abstract: This paper considers the relation between the exploration of new possibilities and the exploitation of old certainties in organizational learning. It examines some complications in allocating resources between the two, particularly those introduced by the distribution of costs and benefits across time and space, and the effects of ecological interaction. Two general situations involving the development and use of knowledge in organizations are modeled. The first is the case of mutual learning between members of an organization and an organizational code. The second is the case of learning and competitive advantage in competition for primacy. The paper develops an argument that adaptive processes, by refining exploitation more rapidly than exploration, are likely to become effective in the short run but self-destructive in the long run. The possibility that certain common organizational practices ameliorate that tendency is assessed.
16,377 citations
6,797 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors organize the product development literature into three streams of research: product development as rational plan, communication web, and disciplined problem solving, and synthesize research findings into a model of factors affecting the success of product development.
Abstract: The literature on product development continues to grow. This research is varied and vibrant, yet large and fragmented. In this article we first organize the burgeoning product-development literature into three streams of research: product development as rational plan, communication web, and disciplined problem solving. Second, we synthesize research findings into a model of factors affecting the success of product development. This model highlights the distinction between process performance and product effectiveness and the importance of agents, including team members, project leaders, senior management, customers, and suppliers, whose behavior affects these outcomes. Third, we indicate potential paths for future research based on the concepts and links that are missing or not well defined in the model.
3,824 citations
"New service development: areas for ..." refers background in this paper
...…that a common set of factors—development process, market/environment, organizational and strategic—impact NPD performance (Schilling and Hill, 1998; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995; Montoya-Weiss and Calantone, 1994) and NSD performance (de Brentani, 1995; Cooper et al., 1994; Cooper and de Brentani,…...
[...]
...This challenge is particularly difficult given the diverse literature reporting NPD research (see Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001; Wind and Mahajan, 1997; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995)....
[...]
...The extant NPD research does not have all the answers to the questions of product or service development, but there is a foundation that can be drawn on (see integrative reviews by Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001; Schilling and Hill, 1998; Wind and Mahajan, 1997; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995)....
[...]
...Underlying the empirical work addressing the antecedents of development performance is the belief that a common set of factors—development process, market/environment, organizational and strategic—impact NPD performance (Schilling and Hill, 1998; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995; Montoya-Weiss and Calantone, 1994) and NSD performance (de Brentani, 1995; Cooper et al....
[...]
Journal Article•
TL;DR: Porter as discussed by the authors argues that the Internet is not disruptive to most existing industries and established companies and, contrary to recent thought, the Internet itself will be neutralized as a source of advantage.
Abstract: Many of the pioneers of Internet business, both dot-coms and established companies, have competed in ways that violate nearly every precept of good strategy. Rather than focus on profits, they have chased customers indiscriminately through discounting, channel incentives, and advertising. Rather than concentrate on delivering value that earns an attractive price from customers, they have pursued indirect revenues such as advertising and click-through fees. Rather than make trade-offs, they have rushed to offer every conceivable product or service. It did not have to be this way--and it does not have to be in the future. When it comes to reinforcing a distinctive strategy, Michael Porter argues, the Internet provides a better technological platform than previous generations of IT. Gaining competitive advantage does not require a radically new approach to business; it requires building on the proven principles of effective strategy. Porter argues that, contrary to recent thought, the Internet is not disruptive to most existing industries and established companies. It rarely nullifies important sources of competitive advantage in an industry; it often makes them even more valuable. And as all companies embrace Internet technology, the Internet itself will be neutralized as a source of advantage. Robust competitive advantages will arise instead from traditional strengths such as unique products, proprietary content, and distinctive physical activities. Internet technology may be able to fortify those advantages, but it is unlikely to supplant them. Porter debunks such Internet myths as first-mover advantage, the power of virtual companies, and the multiplying rewards of network effects. He disentangles the distorted signals from the marketplace, explains why the Internet complements rather than cannibalizes existing ways of doing business, and outlines strategic imperatives for dot-coms and traditional companies.
3,558 citations
"New service development: areas for ..." refers background in this paper
...The Internet dramatically reduces these barriers, as summarized in Table 3 ( Porter, 2001 )....
[...]
...A differentiation strategy is difficult to attain in a service environment where innovations are quickly and easily copied ( Porter, 2001 )....
[...]
Book•
01 Jan 1986TL;DR: Innovation is defined as "the development and implementation of new ideas by people who over time engage in transactions with others within an institutional order" as mentioned in this paper, where the authors focus on four basic factors new ideas, people, transactions, and institutional context.
Abstract: Innovation is defined as the development and implementation of new ideas by people who over time engage in transactions with others within an institutional order. This definition focuses on four basic factors new ideas, people, transactions, and institutional context. An understanding of how these factors are related leads to four basic problems confronting most general managers: 1 a human problem of managing attention, 2 a process problem in managing new ideas into good currency, 3 a structural problem of managing part-whole relationships, and 4 a strategic problem of institutional leadership. This paper discusses these four basic problems and concludes by suggesting how they fit together into an overall framework to guide longitudinal study of the management of innovation.
3,513 citations
"New service development: areas for ..." refers background in this paper
...Focusing on NPD, Van de Ven (1986) notes four problems related to the management of development and innovation efforts....
[...]
...Focusing on NPD, Van de Ven (1986) notes four problems related to the management of development and innovation efforts....
[...]