New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration
01 Apr 2002-Journal of Operations Management (No longer published by Elsevier)-Vol. 20, Iss: 2, pp 135-157
TL;DR: The management of new service development (NSD) has become an important competitive concern in many service industries as discussed by the authors, however, NSD remains among the least studied and understood topics in the service management literature.
About: This article is published in Journal of Operations Management.The article was published on 2002-04-01. It has received 688 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Service system & New product development.
Citations
More filters
02 Aug 2016
TL;DR: Co-creation, namely the involvement of customers in the different stages of the new product development process, is increasingly viewed as an effective strategy to improve the new service success as discussed by the authors. But it is not suitable for large scale systems.
Abstract: Co-creation, namely, the involvement of customers in the different stages of the new product development process, is increasingly viewed as an effective strategy to improve the new service success ...
5 citations
01 Dec 2019
TL;DR: In this paper, the role of customer-facing or frontline employees (FLEs) as sources of inimitable knowledge valuable for service innovation is discussed, and a taxonomy of network domains connecting customer-and internal-facing employees and resource flows is proposed to provide a framework for FLE roles in knowledge networks for service-innovation.
Abstract: Service organizations often view customer-facing or frontline employees (FLEs) as sources of inimitable knowledge valuable for innovation. This is due to the experiential nature of service and subtle qualities of engaging customer interactions. Yet, organizations face significant challenges while leveraging the knowledge of their FLEs to develop service innovations. Drawing upon the open innovation and social network literatures, we theorize the role of FLE networks, and the degree to which these networks enable the flow of distinct content for realizing effective service innovation. Specifically, we conceptualize a taxonomy of network domains—connecting customer- and internal-facing employees, and resource flows—new knowledge and self-governance activities, to provide a framework for FLE roles in knowledge networks for service-innovation. Our taxonomy expands opportunities for theorizing the mechanisms of frontline knowledge networks in service innovation as well as identifying a “dark side” that undermines potential innovation gains if left unchecked. Future directions and implications for theory and practice are discussed.
5 citations
Book Chapter•
17 May 2016TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the results from a qualitative study that examined how the transitions from service concepts through specification to implementation occur, and propose two solutions: strengthening service design thinking inside the service organisations and having better methods and tools that support rigorous service specification.
Abstract: This paper presents the results from a qualitative study that examined how the transitions from service concepts through specification to implementation occur. Twelve people working in service organisations and service design agencies in Norway, were interviewed about their experience and opinions. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using NVivo10, and thematic analysis was applied to confirm the results from NVivo10. We found that there was a big communication gap between service concepts and implementation especially inside the service organisations. To bridge this gap, we propose two solutions: strengthening service design thinking inside the service organisations and having better methods and tools that support rigorous service specification. The results of the study can be useful to service organisations who wish to have deeper insight into the transition process, in addition to service designers and researchers to have a better understanding of the service design and development challenges inside service organisations.
5 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the impact of complexity, technological risk and market risk and uncertainty on the success of modern organizations is discussed, and the importance of innovation in products and services has become a necessity for modern organizations.
Abstract: Innovations in products and services have become a necessity for the survival of modern organizations. The impact of Complexity, Technological risk and Market risk and uncertainty on the success of...
5 citations
Proceedings Article•
01 Jan 2010TL;DR: An approach to service bundling that can be utilized by organizations to identify services that are suitable for bundling is presented and represents a structured conceptualization approach for organizations to facilitate the creation of bundles in practice based on empirical findings.
Abstract: The phenomenon of organizations offering service bundles can typically be observed in dynamic markets with heterogeneous customer demand. Available literature broaching the issue of service bundling covers strategic considerations for organizations related to their respective market position as well as their pricing options for different bundle configurations. However, little guidance can be found regarding the identification of potential bundle candidates and the actual process of bundling. In this paper, we present an approach to service bundling that can be utilized by organizations to identify services that are suitable for bundling. The contribution of the paper is twofold. Firstly, the proposed method represents a structured conceptualization approach for organizations to facilitate the creation of bundles in practice based on empirical findings. Secondly, from a Design Science research perspective, the proposed method represents an innovative artifact that extends the academic knowledge base related to service management.
5 citations
Cites background from "New service development: areas for ..."
...457. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/457 Authors Thomas Kohlborn, Christian Luebeck, Axel Korthaus, Erwin Fielt, Michael Rosemann, Christoph Riedl, and Helmut Krcmar This article is available at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL): http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/457...
[...]
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the relation between the exploration of new possibilities and the exploitation of old certainties in organizational learning and examine some complications in allocating resources between the two, particularly those introduced by the distribution of costs and benefits across time and space.
Abstract: This paper considers the relation between the exploration of new possibilities and the exploitation of old certainties in organizational learning. It examines some complications in allocating resources between the two, particularly those introduced by the distribution of costs and benefits across time and space, and the effects of ecological interaction. Two general situations involving the development and use of knowledge in organizations are modeled. The first is the case of mutual learning between members of an organization and an organizational code. The second is the case of learning and competitive advantage in competition for primacy. The paper develops an argument that adaptive processes, by refining exploitation more rapidly than exploration, are likely to become effective in the short run but self-destructive in the long run. The possibility that certain common organizational practices ameliorate that tendency is assessed.
16,377 citations
6,797 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors organize the product development literature into three streams of research: product development as rational plan, communication web, and disciplined problem solving, and synthesize research findings into a model of factors affecting the success of product development.
Abstract: The literature on product development continues to grow. This research is varied and vibrant, yet large and fragmented. In this article we first organize the burgeoning product-development literature into three streams of research: product development as rational plan, communication web, and disciplined problem solving. Second, we synthesize research findings into a model of factors affecting the success of product development. This model highlights the distinction between process performance and product effectiveness and the importance of agents, including team members, project leaders, senior management, customers, and suppliers, whose behavior affects these outcomes. Third, we indicate potential paths for future research based on the concepts and links that are missing or not well defined in the model.
3,824 citations
"New service development: areas for ..." refers background in this paper
...…that a common set of factors—development process, market/environment, organizational and strategic—impact NPD performance (Schilling and Hill, 1998; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995; Montoya-Weiss and Calantone, 1994) and NSD performance (de Brentani, 1995; Cooper et al., 1994; Cooper and de Brentani,…...
[...]
...This challenge is particularly difficult given the diverse literature reporting NPD research (see Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001; Wind and Mahajan, 1997; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995)....
[...]
...The extant NPD research does not have all the answers to the questions of product or service development, but there is a foundation that can be drawn on (see integrative reviews by Krishnan and Ulrich, 2001; Schilling and Hill, 1998; Wind and Mahajan, 1997; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995)....
[...]
...Underlying the empirical work addressing the antecedents of development performance is the belief that a common set of factors—development process, market/environment, organizational and strategic—impact NPD performance (Schilling and Hill, 1998; Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995; Montoya-Weiss and Calantone, 1994) and NSD performance (de Brentani, 1995; Cooper et al....
[...]
Journal Article•
TL;DR: Porter as discussed by the authors argues that the Internet is not disruptive to most existing industries and established companies and, contrary to recent thought, the Internet itself will be neutralized as a source of advantage.
Abstract: Many of the pioneers of Internet business, both dot-coms and established companies, have competed in ways that violate nearly every precept of good strategy. Rather than focus on profits, they have chased customers indiscriminately through discounting, channel incentives, and advertising. Rather than concentrate on delivering value that earns an attractive price from customers, they have pursued indirect revenues such as advertising and click-through fees. Rather than make trade-offs, they have rushed to offer every conceivable product or service. It did not have to be this way--and it does not have to be in the future. When it comes to reinforcing a distinctive strategy, Michael Porter argues, the Internet provides a better technological platform than previous generations of IT. Gaining competitive advantage does not require a radically new approach to business; it requires building on the proven principles of effective strategy. Porter argues that, contrary to recent thought, the Internet is not disruptive to most existing industries and established companies. It rarely nullifies important sources of competitive advantage in an industry; it often makes them even more valuable. And as all companies embrace Internet technology, the Internet itself will be neutralized as a source of advantage. Robust competitive advantages will arise instead from traditional strengths such as unique products, proprietary content, and distinctive physical activities. Internet technology may be able to fortify those advantages, but it is unlikely to supplant them. Porter debunks such Internet myths as first-mover advantage, the power of virtual companies, and the multiplying rewards of network effects. He disentangles the distorted signals from the marketplace, explains why the Internet complements rather than cannibalizes existing ways of doing business, and outlines strategic imperatives for dot-coms and traditional companies.
3,558 citations
"New service development: areas for ..." refers background in this paper
...The Internet dramatically reduces these barriers, as summarized in Table 3 ( Porter, 2001 )....
[...]
...A differentiation strategy is difficult to attain in a service environment where innovations are quickly and easily copied ( Porter, 2001 )....
[...]
Book•
01 Jan 1986TL;DR: Innovation is defined as "the development and implementation of new ideas by people who over time engage in transactions with others within an institutional order" as mentioned in this paper, where the authors focus on four basic factors new ideas, people, transactions, and institutional context.
Abstract: Innovation is defined as the development and implementation of new ideas by people who over time engage in transactions with others within an institutional order. This definition focuses on four basic factors new ideas, people, transactions, and institutional context. An understanding of how these factors are related leads to four basic problems confronting most general managers: 1 a human problem of managing attention, 2 a process problem in managing new ideas into good currency, 3 a structural problem of managing part-whole relationships, and 4 a strategic problem of institutional leadership. This paper discusses these four basic problems and concludes by suggesting how they fit together into an overall framework to guide longitudinal study of the management of innovation.
3,513 citations
"New service development: areas for ..." refers background in this paper
...Focusing on NPD, Van de Ven (1986) notes four problems related to the management of development and innovation efforts....
[...]
...Focusing on NPD, Van de Ven (1986) notes four problems related to the management of development and innovation efforts....
[...]