scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

News use across social media platforms 2017

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
For instance, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center found that a majority of adults in the United States access their news on social media, with 18% doing so often as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract
As part of an ongoing examination of social media platforms and news, the Pew Research Centre has found that a majority of adults in the United States – 62% or around two thirds – access their news on social media, with 18% doing so often.  The researchers analysed the scope and characteristics of social media news consumers across nine social networking sites, with Facebook coming out on top. News plays a varying role across the social networking sites studied. The survey shows that two-thirds of Facebook users (66%) access news on the site, nearly six-in-ten Twitter users (59%) access news on Twitter, and seven-in-ten Reddit users get news on that platform. On Tumblr, the figure sits at 31%, while for the other five social networking sites it is true of only about one-fifth or less of their user bases. Addressing the issue of news audiences overlapping on social media platforms, the researchers found that of those who access news using at least one of the sites, a majority (64%) access news on just one – most commonly Facebook. About a quarter (26%) get news on two social media sites. Just one-in-ten access news on three or more sites. The study is based on a survey conducted between 12 January and 8 February 2016 with 4,654 members of the Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The spread of true and false news online

TL;DR: A large-scale analysis of tweets reveals that false rumors spread further and faster than the truth, and false news was more novel than true news, which suggests that people were more likely to share novel information.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

TL;DR: The authors found that people are much more likely to believe stories that favor their preferred candidate, especially if they have ideologically segregated social media networks, and that the average American adult saw on the order of one or perhaps several fake news stories in the months around the 2016 U.S. presidential election, with just over half of those who recalled seeing them believing them.
Journal ArticleDOI

Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions

TL;DR: A review of how previous studies have defined and operationalized the term "fake news" can be found in this article, based on a review of 34 academic articles that used the term 'fake news' between 2003 and 2013.
Journal ArticleDOI

Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media

TL;DR: In this paper, preliminary research involves preliminary research to understand the mechanism by which influencer marketing affects the effectiveness of influencer campaigns, and the results show that the effect of influencers' marketing on the performance of online advertising has been studied.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature

TL;DR: The authors provide an overview of the current state of the literature on the relationship between social media; political polarization; and political "disinformation", a term used to encompass a wide range of types of information about politics found online.
Related Papers (5)