scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

No general edge effects for invertebrates at Afromontane forest/grassland ecotones

01 Mar 2001-Biodiversity and Conservation (Kluwer Academic Publishers)-Vol. 10, Iss: 3, pp 443-466
TL;DR: The authors investigated epigaeic amphipod, carabid and ant distribution patterns across Afromontane forest/grassland ecotones and found little evidence to support the biological edge effect.
Abstract: The Afromontane region of South Africa is characterised by numerous small, remnant forests in a grassland matrix. The edges, or ecotones between forests and grasslands are usually sharp (typically just over a few metres) and are mainly maintained by both natural and, more recently, anthropogenic fires. We investigated epigaeic amphipod, carabid and ant distribution patterns across Afromontane forest/grassland ecotones and found little evidence to support the biological edge effect. Five of the fifty-two sampled species however, did increase significantly in abundance at the ecotone. Among these was a very distinct edge species, the amphipod Talistroides africana. Overall, carabids were more abundant and species rich in forests while for ants it was in the grasslands. Ants and carabids were both more abundant and species rich in spring and summer than in autumn and winter. More interestingly, the abundance and species richness patterns across the ecotone did not change with the passing of the seasons. We argue that a conservation strategy for the Afromontane forest patches must also incorporate the surrounding grassland. The grassland habitat is often perceived as less valuable than forest and, as a consequence, is subject to many anthropogenic disturbances such as fragmentation, cattle grazing and afforestation. Protecting grasslands around forest patches not only conserves the rich ant diversity, but also conserves the biota in the forests and at the edges, and would therefore be more meaningful in terms of the overall conservation of Afromontane biodiversity.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work reviews the extensive literature on species responses to habitat fragmentation, and detail the numerous ways in which confounding factors have either masked the detection, or prevented the manifestation, of predicted fragmentation effects.
Abstract: Habitat loss has pervasive and disruptive impacts on biodiversity in habitat remnants. The magnitude of the ecological impacts of habitat loss can be exacerbated by the spatial arrangement -- or fragmentation -- of remaining habitat. Fragmentation per se is a landscape-level phenomenon in which species that survive in habitat remnants are confronted with a modified environment of reduced area, increased isolation and novel ecological boundaries. The implications of this for individual organisms are many and varied, because species with differing life history strategies are differentially affected by habitat fragmentation. Here, we review the extensive literature on species responses to habitat fragmentation, and detail the numerous ways in which confounding factors have either masked the detection, or prevented the manifestation, of predicted fragmentation effects. Large numbers of empirical studies continue to document changes in species richness with decreasing habitat area, with positive, negative and no relationships regularly reported. The debate surrounding such widely contrasting results is beginning to be resolved by findings that the expected positive species-area relationship can be masked by matrix-derived spatial subsidies of resources to fragment-dwelling species and by the invasion of matrix-dwelling species into habitat edges. Significant advances have been made recently in our understanding of how species interactions are altered at habitat edges as a result of these changes. Interestingly, changes in biotic and abiotic parameters at edges also make ecological processes more variable than in habitat interiors. Individuals are more likely to encounter habitat edges in fragments with convoluted shapes, leading to increased turnover and variability in population size than in fragments that are compact in shape. Habitat isolation in both space and time disrupts species distribution patterns, with consequent effects on metapopulation dynamics and the genetic structure of fragment-dwelling populations. Again, the matrix habitat is a strong determinant of fragmentation effects within remnants because of its role in regulating dispersal and dispersal-related mortality, the provision of spatial subsidies and the potential mediation of edge-related microclimatic gradients. We show that confounding factors can mask many fragmentation effects. For instance, there are multiple ways in which species traits like trophic level, dispersal ability and degree of habitat specialisation influence species-level responses. The temporal scale of investigation may have a strong influence on the results of a study, with short-term crowding effects eventually giving way to long-term extinction debts. Moreover, many fragmentation effects like changes in genetic, morphological or behavioural traits of species require time to appear. By contrast, synergistic interactions of fragmentation with climate change, human-altered disturbance regimes, species interactions and other drivers of population decline may magnify the impacts of fragmentation. To conclude, we emphasise that anthropogenic fragmentation is a recent phenomenon in evolutionary time and suggest that the final, long-term impacts of habitat fragmentation may not yet have shown themselves.

1,889 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although indicator taxa are considered to be generally unreliable as broad indicators of biodiversity, they may serve a useful function in identifying ecological characteristics or monitoring the effects of habitat management.
Abstract: Bioindicators, as taxa or functional groups, are widely used as indicators of environmental change, specific ecological factors or taxonomic diversity. The use of ecological, environmental and biodiversity indicators, is reviewed here. Although indicator taxa are considered to be generally unreliable as broad indicators of biodiversity, they may serve a useful function in identifying ecological characteristics or monitoring the effects of habitat management. Use of only a narrow range of taxa may be unreliable, and is particularly vulnerable to distortion by a small number of invasive species. Taxa also need to be selected to reflect the specific ecosystem being studied. It is recommended that isopods be used for soil systems (if there is sufficient local diversity), in some areas earthworms or mites may be useable but are generally too difficult to identify to be practically useful. In the ground layer indicator sets could include ants, millipedes, molluscs (snails in particular), ground beetles, harvestmen and gnaphosid spiders. Foliage-inhabiting indicators could comprise ants, chrysomelid leaf beetles, theridiid spiders and arctiid moths. Ants, orthopterans and butterflies may be appropriate for use in open habitats. These basic sets should be supplemented by other taxa where appropriate resources and taxonomic expertise are available.

346 citations


Cites background from "No general edge effects for inverte..."

  • ...There is evidence that in South Africa, they are edge specialists in Afromontane forest/ grassland interfaces (Kotze and Samways 2001)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that crustaceans inhabiting fragmented Zostera seagrass meadows show a dramatic response (change in abundance) to patch edges, with 11 out of 12 tests showing greatest abundance at the boundary between sand and seagRass.
Abstract: Fragmented habitats are a common occurrence in many marine systems, but remain poorly studied in comparison to their terrestrial counterparts. Here, I show that crustaceans inhabiting fragmented Zostera seagrass meadows show a dramatic response (change in abundance) to patch edges, with 11 out of 12 tests showing greatest abundance at the boundary between sand and seagrass. These patterns occurred on a scale of 0.25-1 m around the patch edge. Changes in seagrass biomass are unlikely to explain this pattern, as seagrass biomass increased smoothly at the patch edge, and did not decline towards patch interiors. In contrast to crustaceans, only a few polychaete taxa responded to the patch edge (9 of 25 tests), and bivalves generally did not show a response (1 of 5 tests). These latter groups are predominantly infaunal, and their lack of response may be partly due to the presence of substantial quantities of seagrass root and rhizome material in the sand habitat, which was defined visually based on the lack of above-ground seagrass components only.

131 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of small-scale disturbance on terrestrial arthropods and select groups that could be used as ecological indicators in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest were assessed, and the abundance of exotic species was higher in the disturbed site, and this pattern seems to be an adequate indicator of anthropogenic disturbance.

119 citations


Cites background from "No general edge effects for inverte..."

  • ...Anthropogenic disturbance may affect species richness and diversity in several ways, and responses may vary within studies among taxonomic or functional groups or among studies within the same group (Kimberling et al., 2001; Kotze and Samways, 2001; Perfecto et al., 2003; Rainio and Niemelä, 2003; Hill and Hamer, 2004; Schulze et al., 2004; Barlow et al., 2007; Basset et al., 2008; Fonseca et al., 2009; Pardini et al., 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...…ways, and responses may vary within studies among taxonomic or functional groups or among studies within the same group (Kimberling et al., 2001; Kotze and Samways, 2001; Perfecto et al., 2003; Rainio and Niemelä, 2003; Hill and Hamer, 2004; Schulze et al., 2004; Barlow et al., 2007; Basset et…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared ground beetles (Carabidae) from a range of different forest fragments along an urbanization gradient in Brussels, Belgium, and found that the effects of urbanization, forest size and edge effects slightly influenced total species richness and abundance but appeared to have a major effect on ground beetle assemblages through species specific responses.

102 citations


Cites background from "No general edge effects for inverte..."

  • ...In some studies, forest edges are supposed to function as source habitats (Pulliam, 1988) or stepping stones (Den Boer, 1990) for small scale dispersal processes after disturbances (Magura, 2002) as edges contain species from both adjacent habitats (Kotze and Samways, 2001)....

    [...]

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 2001

11,748 citations


"No general edge effects for inverte..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Didham (1997) pointed out that an increase in insect abundance and diversity at forest edges is almost certainly a result of invasion of generalist species from disturbed habitats outside the forest fragment, also termed the mass effect (Shmida and Wilson 1985). The question is then, whether edge effects are a characteristic of natural habitat boundaries, or whether they are an artefact of anthropogenically created landscape patterns. Kolasa and Zalewski (1995) argued that the identification of an ecotone depends on the time over which interactions of two habitats are observed. Furthermore, Wolda (1992) emphasised that invertebrate assemblages inevitably change over time....

    [...]

  • ...Didham (1997) pointed out that an increase in insect abundance and diversity at forest edges is almost certainly a result of invasion of generalist species from disturbed habitats outside the forest fragment, also termed the mass effect (Shmida and Wilson 1985)....

    [...]

  • ...Cluster analysis aims to find natural groupings of samples such that samples within a group are more similar to each other than samples in different groups (Clarke and Warwick 1994)....

    [...]

  • ...Didham (1997) pointed out that an increase in insect abundance and diversity at forest edges is almost certainly a result of invasion of generalist species from disturbed habitats outside the forest fragment, also termed the mass effect (Shmida and Wilson 1985). The question is then, whether edge effects are a characteristic of natural habitat boundaries, or whether they are an artefact of anthropogenically created landscape patterns. Kolasa and Zalewski (1995) argued that the identification of an ecotone depends on the time over which interactions of two habitats are observed....

    [...]

Book
01 Jan 1953
TL;DR: This book discusses the role of energy in Ecological Systems, its role in ecosystem development, and its implications for future generations of ecologists.
Abstract: Preface. Eugene P. Odum and Gary W. Barrett. 1. The Scope of Ecology. 2. The Ecosystem. 3. Energy in Ecological Systems. 4. Biogeochemical Cycles. 5. Limiting and Regulatory Factors. 6. Population Ecology. 7. Community Ecology. 8. Ecosystem Development. 9. Landscape Ecology. 10. Regional Ecology: Major Ecosystem Types and Biomes. 11. Global Ecology. 12. Statistical Thinking for Students of Ecology. Glossary. References. Index.

6,230 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although estimates of the intensity and impact of edge effects in fragmented forests are urgently required, little can be done to ameliorate edge effects unless their mechanics are better understood.
Abstract: Edges are presumed to have deleterious consequences for the organisms that remain in forest fragments. However, there is substantial discrepancy among recent studies about the existence and intensity of edge effects. Most studies have focused on seeking simplistic and static patterns. Very few have tested mechanistic hypotheses or explored the factors that modulate edge effects. Consequently,studies are very site-specifci and their results cannot be generalized to produce a universal theory of edges. Although estimates of the intensity and impact of edge effects in fragmented forests are urgently required, little can be done to ameliorate edge effects unless their mechanics are better understood.

2,759 citations


"No general edge effects for inverte..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Edge effects, manifested as elevated species richness (Odum 1971; Rapoport et al. 1986; Murcia 1995; Risser 1995) as a change in species interactions (Wilcove 1985; Andren and Angelstam 1988) or abiotic factors (Murcia 1995) are often associated with ecotones....

    [...]

  • ...In our study there was no significant increase in numbers of carabid and ant individuals or species at the sharp Afromontane forest edges, i.e. no biological edge effect (Murcia 1995; Dennis 1997) was observed....

    [...]

  • ...Edge effects, manifested as elevated species richness (Odum 1971; Rapoport et al. 1986; Murcia 1995; Risser 1995) as a change in species interactions (Wilcove 1985; Andrén and Angelstam 1988) or abiotic factors (Murcia 1995) are often associated with ecotones....

    [...]

  • ...no biological edge effect ( Murcia 1995; Dennis 1997) was observed....

    [...]

  • ...Edge effects, manifested as elevated species richness (Odum 1971; Rapoport et al. 1986; Murcia 1995; Risser 1995) as a change in species interactions (Wilcove 1985; Andren and Angelstam 1988) or abiotic factors ( Murcia 1995 ) are often associated with ecotones....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Odum and Barrett as mentioned in this paper discuss the scope of ecology and its role in the development of communities and landscapes, and provide an overview of the major ecosystems types and biomes.
Abstract: Preface. Eugene P. Odum and Gary W. Barrett. 1. The Scope of Ecology. 2. The Ecosystem. 3. Energy in Ecological Systems. 4. Biogeochemical Cycles. 5. Limiting and Regulatory Factors. 6. Population Ecology. 7. Community Ecology. 8. Ecosystem Development. 9. Landscape Ecology. 10. Regional Ecology: Major Ecosystem Types and Biomes. 11. Global Ecology. 12. Statistical Thinking for Students of Ecology. Glossary. References. Index.

2,534 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

2,406 citations


Additional excerpts

  • ...(Acocks 1988)....

    [...]