scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests

James G. MacKinnon
- 01 Nov 1996 - 
- Vol. 11, Iss: 6, pp 601-618
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors used response surface regressions based on simulation experiments to calculate distribution functions for some well-known unit root and cointegration test statistics, which can be used to calculate both asymptotic and finite sample critical values and P-values for any of the tests.
Abstract
SUMMARY This paper employs response surface regressions based on simulation experiments to calculate distribution functions for some well-known unit root and cointegration test statistics. The principal contributions of the paper are a set of data files that contain estimated response surface coefficients and a computer program for utilizing them. This program, which is freely available via the Internet, can easily be used to calculate both asymptotic and finite-sample critical values and P-values for any of the tests. Graphs of some of the tabulated distribution functions are provided. An empirical example deals with interest rates and inflation rates in Canada. Tests of the null hypothesis that a time-series process has a unit root have been widely used in recent years, as have tests of the null hypothesis that two or more integrated series are not cointegrated. The most commonly used unit root tests are based on the work of Dickey and Fuller (1979) and Said and Dickey (1984). These are known as Dickey-Fuller (DF) tests and Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) tests, respectively. These tests have non-standard distributions, even asymptotically. The cointegration tests developed by Engle and Granger (1987) are closely related to DF and ADF tests, but they have different, non-standard distributions, which depend on the number of possibly cointegrated variables. Although the asymptotic theory of these unit root and cointegration tests is well developed, it is not at all easy for applied workers to calculate the marginal significance level, or P-value, associated with a given test statistic. Until a few years ago (MacKinnon, 1991), accurate critical values for cointegration tests were not available at all. In a recent paper (MacKinnon, 1994), I used simulation methods to estimate the asymptotic distributions of a large number of unit root and cointegration tests. I then obtained reasonably simple approximating equations that may be used to obtain approximate asymptotic P-values. In the present paper, I extend the results to allow for up to 12 variables, instead of six, and I correct two deficiencies of the earlier work. The first deficiency is that the approximating equations are considerably less accurate than the underlying estimated asymptotic distributions. The second deficiency is that, even though the simulation experiments provided information about the finite-sample distributions of the test statistics, the approximating equations were obtained only for the asymptotic case. The key to overcoming these two deficiencies is to use tables of response surface coefficients, from which estimated quantiles for any sample size may be calculated, instead of equations to

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Unit root tests for panel data

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed unit root tests for panel data under more general assumptions than the tests previously proposed, such as the number of groups in the panel data is assumed to be either finite or infinite.
Posted Content

Critical values for cointegration tests

TL;DR: In this article, the results of the simulation experiments are summarized by means of response surface regressions in which critical values depend on the sample size and can be read off directly, and critical values for any finite sample size can easily be computed with a hand calculator.
Journal ArticleDOI

Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration

TL;DR: In this article, the authors employ response surface regressions based on simulation experiments to calculate asymptotic distribution functions for the Johansen-type likelihood ratio tests for cointegration.
Posted Content

Numerical Distribution Functions of Likelihood Ratio Tests for Cointegration

TL;DR: The authors employed response surface regressions based on simulation experments to calculate asymptotic distribution functions for the likelihood ratio tests for cointegration proposed by Johansen and provided tables of critical values that are very much more accurate than those available previously.
Journal ArticleDOI

New Simple Tests for Panel Cointegration

TL;DR: In this article, two simple residual-based panel data tests are proposed for the null of no cointegration, which do not require any correction for the temporal dependencies of the data.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing

TL;DR: The relationship between co-integration and error correction models, first suggested in Granger (1981), is here extended and used to develop estimation procedures, tests, and empirical examples.
Journal ArticleDOI

Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root

TL;DR: In this article, the limit distributions of the estimator of p and of the regression t test are derived under the assumption that p = ± 1, where p is a fixed constant and t is a sequence of independent normal random variables.
Journal ArticleDOI

Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed new tests for detecting the presence of a unit root in quite general time series models, which accommodate models with a fitted drift and a time trend so that they may be used to discriminate between unit root nonstationarity and stationarity about a deterministic trend.

Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models / Søren Johansen

S Johansen
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the likelihood methods for the analysis of cointegration in VAR models with Gaussian errors, seasonal dummies, and constant terms, and show that the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator is mixed Gausssian.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models

Søren Johansen
- 01 Nov 1991 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors derived the likelihood analysis of vector autoregressive models allowing for cointegration and showed that the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of the cointegrating relations can be found by reduced rank regression and derives the likelihood ratio test of structural hypotheses about these relations.
Related Papers (5)