On generalizations of positive subdefinite matrices and the linear complementarity problem
TL;DR: The notion of generalized positive subdefinite matrices of level k is introduced by generalizing the definition of generalized Positive Subdefinite Matrices introduced by Crouzeix and Komlósi in [Applied optimization].
Abstract: In this paper, we introduce the notion of generalized positive subdefinite matrices of level k by generalizing the definition of generalized positive subdefinite matrices introduced by Crouzeix and Komlosi in [Applied optimization. Vol. 59, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications; 2001. p. 45–63]. The main motivation behind this generalization is to identify new subclasses of row sufficient matrices [Cottle, Pang and Venkateswaran, Linear Algebra Appl. 1989;114/115:231–249] which are not a subclass of copositive matrices. We establish new sufficient conditions for a matrix to be a non-copositive matrix and a non-copositive row sufficient matrix using the notion of generalized positive subdefinite matrices of level k. We present a new termination result for Lemke’s algorithm which supplements Jones’ result [Math Program. 1986;35:239–242].
...read more
References
2,837 citations
993 citations
"On generalizations of positive subd..." refers background in this paper
...The LCP provides a unified framework to study linear and quadratic programming problems as well as bimatrix game problems and it arises in a number of applications in operations research, mathematical economics, engineering and game theory (for details see [1,2])....
[...]
...The significance of matrix classes in the theory of LCP is well-known (see [1,2])....
[...]
948 citations
"On generalizations of positive subd..." refers background in this paper
...The importance of characterizing non-copositive row sufficient matrices is underscored by the fact that it exemplifies a familiar class of matrices that need not be copositive-plus [14]....
[...]
...Jones [15] proved the following termination criterion for Lemke’s algorithm that unifies Lemke’s result [14] and Evers’ result [24]....
[...]
202 citations
144 citations