scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

On the Use of Doppler Shift for Sea Surface Wind Retrieval From SAR

TL;DR: In this article, an empirical geophysical model function (CDOP) is derived, predicting Doppler shifts at both VV and HH polarization as function of wind speed, radar incidence angle, and wind direction with respect to radar look direction.
Abstract: The synthetic aperture radar (SAR) Doppler centroid has been used to estimate the scatter line-of-sight radar velocity. In weak to moderate ocean surface current environment, the SAR Doppler centroid is dominated by the directionality and strength of wave-induced ocean surface displacements. In this paper, we show how this sea state signature can be used to improve surface wind retrieval from SAR. Doppler shifts of C-band radar return signals from the ocean are thoroughly investigated by colocating wind measurements from the ASCAT scatterometer with Doppler centroid anomalies retrieved from Envisat ASAR. An empirical geophysical model function (CDOP) is derived, predicting Doppler shifts at both VV and HH polarization as function of wind speed, radar incidence angle, and wind direction with respect to radar look direction. This function is used into a Bayesian inversion scheme in combination with wind from a priori forecast model and the normalized radar cross section (NRCS). The benefit of Doppler for SAR wind retrieval is shown in complex meteorological situations such as atmospheric fronts or low pressure systems. Using in situ information, validation reveals that this method helps to improve the wind direction retrieval. Uncertainty of the calibration of Doppler shift from Envisat ASAR hampers the inversion scheme in cases where NRCS and model wind are accurate and in close agreement. The method is however very promising with respect of future SAR missions, in particular Sentinel-1, where the Doppler centroid anomaly will be more robustly retrieved.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper opens perspectives for MetOp-SG SCA, the next-generation C-band scatterometer with co- and cross-polarization capability, and shows that the decrease in resolution does not dramatically change the sensitivity difference between VV and VH polarizations.
Abstract: During summer 2016, the European Space Agency (ESA) set up the Satellite Hurricane Observations Campaign, a campaign dedicated to hurricane observations with Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) in both vertical-vertical (VV) and vertical-horizontal (VH) polarizations acquired in wide swath modes. Among the 70 Sentinel-1 passes scheduled by the ESA mission planning team, more than 20 observations over hurricane eyes were acquired and tropical cyclones were captured at different development stages. This enables us to detail the sensitivity difference of VH and VV normalized radar cross section (NRCS) to the response of intense ocean surface winds. As found, the sensitivity of the VH-NRCS computed at 3-km resolution is reported to be more than 3.5 times larger than in VV. Taking opportunity of SAR high resolution, we also show that the decrease in resolution (up to 25 km) does not dramatically change the sensitivity difference between VV and VH polarizations. For wind speeds larger than 25 m/s, a new geophysical model function (MS1A) to interpret cross-polarized signal is proposed. Both channels are then combined to get ocean surface wind vectors. SAR winds are further compared at 40-km resolution against L-band soil moisture active and passive mission (SMAP) radiometer winds with co-locations less than 30 min. Overall excellent consistency is found between SMAP and this new SAR winds. This paper opens perspectives for MetOp-SG SCA, the next-generation C-band scatterometer with co- and cross-polarization capability.

107 citations


Additional excerpts

  • ...Hereafter, a standard procedure to retrieve surface wind information from single-antenna SAR observations (see [8], [9]) is then extended to consistently consider and combine CP measurements....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the offshore wind climatology in the Northern European seas using a total of 9256 scenes, ten years of QuikSCAT and two years of ASCAT gridded ocean surface vector wind products and high quality wind observations from four meteorological masts in the North Sea.

89 citations


Cites background from "On the Use of Doppler Shift for Sea..."

  • ...…(Furevik, Johannessen, & Sandvik, 2002; Gerling, 1986; Koch, 2004; Lehner, Horstmann, Koch, & Rosenthal, 1998) or the Doppler shift in SAR data (Mouche et al., 2012), from scatterometer (Monaldo, Thompson, Pichel, & Clemente-Colon, 2004) and from in-situ measurements (Christiansen et al.,…...

    [...]

  • ...Other options for obtaining wind directions are: wind streak analysis (Furevik, Johannessen, & Sandvik, 2002; Gerling, 1986; Koch, 2004; Lehner, Horstmann, Koch, & Rosenthal, 1998) or the Doppler shift in SAR data (Mouche et al., 2012), from scatterometer (Monaldo, Thompson, Pichel, & Clemente-Colon, 2004) and from in-situ measurements (Christiansen et al....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a methodology is demonstrated to exploit the polarization sensitivity of high-resolution radar measurements to interpret and quantify upper ocean dynamics, where the polarized Bragg-type radar scattering is isolated by considering the difference (PD) between vertically and horizontally polarized radar signals.
Abstract: A methodology is demonstrated to exploit the polarization sensitivity of high-resolution radar measurements to interpret and quantify upper ocean dynamics. This study particularly illustrates the potential of quad-polarization synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements. The analysis relies on essential characteristics of the electromagnetic scattering mechanisms and hydrodynamical principles. As the relaxation scale of centimeter-scale ocean surface scatters is typically small, radar signal anomalies associated with surface manifestations of the upper ocean dynamics on spatial scales exceeding 100 m are mostly dominated by nonresonant and nonpolarized scatters. These “scalar” contributions can thus efficiently trace local breaking and near-breaking areas, caused by surface current variations. Using dual copolarized measurements, the polarized Bragg-type radar scattering is isolated by considering the difference (PD) between vertically and horizontally polarized radar signals. The nonpolarized (NP) contribution associated with wave breaking is then deduced, using the measured polarization ratio (PR) between polarized signals. Considering SAR scenes depicting various surface manifestations of the upper ocean dynamics (internal waves, mesoscale surface current features, and SST front), the proposed methodology and set of decompositions (PD, PR, and NP) efficiently enable the discrimination between surface manifestation of upper ocean dynamics and wind field variability. Applied to quad-polarized SAR images, such decompositions further provide unique opportunities to more directly assess the cross-polarized (CP for HV or VH) signal sensitivity to surface roughness changes. As demonstrated, such an analysis unambiguously demonstrates and quantitatively evaluates the relative impact of breakers on cross-polarized signals under low to moderate wind conditions.

87 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Alexis Mouche1, Bertrand Chapron1
TL;DR: In this paper, a global analysis of ENVISAT and Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements helps to refine, at medium resolution (tens of kilometers) and especially for HH configuration, a C-band geophysical model function (GMF) to analyze wind sensitivity for different incidence and azimuth angles.
Abstract: Using colocated ASCAT and ECMWF winds, a careful global analysis of ENVISAT and Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements helps to refine, at medium resolution (tens of kilometers) and especially for HH configuration, a C-band geophysical model function (GMF, i.e., C-SARMOD) to analyze wind sensitivity for different incidence and azimuth angles. Results unify major findings from previous global and case studies for polarization ratio (PR, VV/HH), polarization difference (PD, VV-HH), and cross-polarization (CP). At lower level than standard two-scale predictions, PR increases with increasing incidence angle and decreases with increasing wind speed. PR further exhibits a strong azimuthal modulation, with maximum values in downwind configurations. The PD azimuth modulation is found more pronounced for VV than HH (VV being larger than HH), reaching maximum values for wind speed about 10 m/s. CP signals decrease with incidence angle but increase with wind speed, especially beyond 10 m/s, with no evidence of saturation. Remarkably, this also applies to HH crosswind measurements. This comparable high wind sensitivity for both CP and HH crosswind signals, with a clear departure from PD ones, can be related to the onset of vigorous breaking events, large enough to impact in-plane and out-of-plane local tilts. Considering that VV polarization best maximizes the polarized resonant contribution, combined CP and VV wide swath SAR observations can thus have the potential to efficiently map and contrast local directional aspects.

86 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The processing steps and error corrections needed to retrieve estimates of sea surface range Doppler velocities from Envisat Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar Wide Swath Medium resolution image products are presented and retrieval accuracies based on examination of the corrected Dopplers shift measurements are assessed.
Abstract: The processing steps and error corrections needed to retrieve estimates of sea surface range Doppler velocities from Envisat Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar Wide Swath Medium resolution image products are presented. Retrieval accuracies based on examination of the corrected Doppler shift measurements are assessed. The root-mean-square errors of the Doppler shift after bias corrections are found to be 4.7 and 3.9 Hz in VV and HH polarizations, respectively. At 35° incidence angle, this corresponds to horizontal Doppler velocities of 23 and 19 cm/s.

82 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors estimate the 18 coefficients of the CMOD4 σ0-to-wind transfer function using a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method in order to improve the prelaunch function.
Abstract: In this paper we estimate the 18 coefficients of the CMOD4 σ0-to-wind transfer function using a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method in order to improve the prelaunch function. We show that a MLE method has to be used with caution when dealing with a nonlinear relationship or with measurement errors that depend on the measured values. In the transfer function estimation it is crucial to use the components of the wind, rather than wind speed and direction, to use σ0 in logarithmic units rather than physical ones, and to use well-sampled input data. In Stoffelen and Anderson [1997a] we showed that the triplets of measured backscatter are very coherent and, when plotted in a three-dimensional measurement space, they lie on a well-defined conical surface. Here we propose a strategy for validation of a transfer function, the first step of which is to test the ability of a transfer function to fit this conical surface. We derive an objective measure to compute the average fit of the transfer function surface to the distribution of measured σ0 triplets. The transfer function CMOD4, derived in the first part of this paper, is shown to fit the cone surface to within the observed scatter normal to the cone, i.e., within roughly 0.2 dB, equivalent to a root-mean-square wind vector error of ∼0.5 m s−1 The second step in the validation strategy is the verification of retrieved scatterometer winds at each position on the cone surface. Scatterometer winds computed from CMOD4 compare better to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts model winds than real-time conventional surface wind data (ship, buoy, or island reports) with the root-mean-square wind vector difference typically 3.0 m s−1. This surprising result can be explained by the so-called representativeness error. We further show that no significant spatial wind error correlation is present in scatterometer data and therefore conclude that the ERS 1 scatterometer provides winds useful for weather forecasting and climate studies.

538 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a new C-band geophysical model function (GMF) is derived on the basis of measurements from the scatterometer on board of the European Remote Sensing Satellite ERS-2.
Abstract: [1] In this paper CMOD5, a new C-band geophysical model function (GMF), is derived on the basis of measurements from the scatterometer on board of the European Remote Sensing Satellite ERS-2. First-guess winds from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts were used as a reference for the period from August to December 1998, adding up to more than 22,000,000 collocations. CMOD5 corrects some deficiencies of the currently widely used CMOD4 GMF. Linear and higher-order wind speed corrections as computed with a triple collocation method are implemented. Recent measurements of extreme backscatter and wind obtained by aircraft and in situ data are fitted. Also, a more accurate fit of the two-dimensional cone surface in three-dimensional measurement space is established, especially in the regime of strong winds. These improvements result not only in better wind retrievals at high wind speed, but also in a more uniform performance across the ERS scatterometer swath. Moreover, the wind ambiguity problem has been reduced owing to the improved fit of the cone surface, resulting in about 75% skill of the first rank solution for winds above 10 m/s. These improvements aid the general usefulness of retrieved C-band scatterometer winds for climate and weather applications, and the ambiguity removal in dynamical and extreme weather conditions in particular.

507 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the median Doppler shift of radar echoes is analyzed in measurements by ENVISAT's Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) over the ocean, and a simple quantitative forward model is proposed, based on a practical two-scale decomposition of the surface geometry and kinematics.
Abstract: The median Doppler shift of radar echoes is analyzed in measurements by ENVISAT's Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) over the ocean. This Doppler centroid differs from a predicted signal based on the predicted motion of the satellite and Earth. This anomaly, converted to a surface Doppler velocity U D , appears to be of geophysical origin. Two wide-swath images over the Gulf Stream around Cape Hatteras suggest that U D contains high-resolution information on surface currents, while on a global scale, U D is found to vary with the wind speed in the range direction. A simple quantitative forward model is proposed, based on a practical two-scale decomposition of the surface geometry and kinematics. The model represents the effect of the wind through the wave spectrum, and gives U D ≈ γU 10 ∥ + U c ∥ , with U 10 ∥ and U c ∥ as the 10 m wind speed and quasi-Eulerian current in the line of sight of the radar projected on the sea surface, respectively, and γ as a coefficient function of the wind speed, wave development, and radar geometry. It is found that for an incidence angle of 23°, γ ≈ 0.3 for moderate winds and fully developed seas. This model is validated with a global data set of ASAR Wave Mode observations, with colocated model winds, acquired over the global ocean during the years 2003 and 2004. The Doppler signal therefore provides the signed parameter U D that can be used to reduce the wind direction ambiguity in the inversion of high-resolution wind fields from SAR imagery. A qualitative validation of current effects is shown for the English Channel where tidal currents dominate. Thus it should be possible to combine this previously ignored geophysical Doppler signal with traditional information on sea surface roughness, in order to provide very high resolution wind and current fields.

298 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive analysis of the backscattering measurements in the case of high winds and high sea states obtained within TCs is proposed in order to refine the interpretation of the wind vector derived from a backscatter model that is currently only calibrated up to moderate winds (< 20 m/s) in neutral conditions.
Abstract: Unprecedented views of surface wind fields in tropical cyclones (hereafter TCs) are provided by the European Remote Sensing Satellite (ERS) C band scatterometer. Scatterometer measurements at C band are able to penetrate convective storms clouds, observing the surface wind fields with good accuracy. However the resolution of the measurements (50x50 km 2) limits the interpretation of the scatterometer signals in such mesoscale events. The strong gradients of the surface wind existing at scales of a few kms are smoothed in the measured features such as the intensity and location of the wind maxima, and the position of the center. Beyond the ERS systems, the scatterometers on-board the ADEOS and METOP satellites, designed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and by the European Space Agency, respectively, will be able to produce measurements of the backscattering coefficient at about 25x25 km 2 resolution. A few sets of ERS-1 orbits sampling TC events were produced with an experimental 25x25 km 2 resolution. Enhancing the resolution by a factor of 2 allows location of the wind maxima and minima in a TC with a much better accuracy than at 50 km resolution. In addition, a better resolution reduces the geophysical noise (variability of wind speed within the cell and effect of rain) that dominates the radiometric noise and hence improves the definition of the backscattering measurements. A comprehensive analysis of the backscattering measurements in the case of high winds and high sea states obtained within TCs is proposed in order to refine the interpretation of the wind vector derived from a backscattering model that is currently only calibrated up to moderate winds (< 20 m/s) in neutral conditions. Observations of the TOPEX-POSEIDON dual-frequency altimeter are also used for that purpose. Patterns of the surface winds in TCs are described and characteristic features concerning asymmetries in the maximum winds and in the divergence field are discussed.

283 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The method described here is based on the local gradients computed with standard image processing algorithms and handles image features not caused by wind and can be applied to irregularly shaped regions.
Abstract: Currently, the retrieval of wind fields from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images suffers from inadequate knowledge of the wind direction. State-of-the-art spectral analysis works fine on open seas, but is limited in spatial resolution. The method described here is based on the local gradients computed with standard image processing algorithms. It handles image features not caused by wind and can be applied to irregularly shaped regions. The new method has already been applied to many images from the European Remote sensing Satellite SARs and RADARSAT-1 ScanSAR, usually supplying reasonable wind fields. The spatial sampling most frequently used was 20 /spl times/ 20 and 10/spl times/10 km/sup 2/. In some cases, samplings down to 1/spl times/1 km/sup 2/ were tested. This paper describes the local gradients method including the filtering of nonwind generated image features and gives some application examples.

234 citations