scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

One dimensional man

01 May 1965-Philosophical Books (Blackwell Publishing Ltd)-Vol. 6, Iss: 2, pp 17-20
About: This article is published in Philosophical Books.The article was published on 1965-05-01. It has received 2842 citations till now.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The demarcation of science from other intellectual activities is an analytic problem for philosophers and sociologists and is examined as a practical problem for scientists in this article, where a set of characteristics available for ideological attribution to science reflect ambivalences or strains within the institution: science can be made to look empirical or theoretical, pure or applied.
Abstract: The demarcation of science from other intellectual activities-long an analytic problem for philosophers and sociologists-is here examined as a practical problem for scientists. Construction of a boundary between science and varieties of non-science is useful for scientists' pursuit of professional goals: acquisition of intellectual authority and career opportunities; denial of these resources to "pseudoscientists"; and protection of the autonomy of scientific research from political interference. "Boundary-work" describes an ideological style found in scientists' attempts to create a public image for science by contrasting it favorably to non-scientific intellectual or technical activities. Alternative sets of characteristics available for ideological attribution to science reflect ambivalences or strains within the institution: science can be made to look empirical or theoretical, pure or applied. However, selection of one or another description depends on which characteristics best achieve the demarcation in a way that justifies scientists' claims to authority or resources. Thus, "science" is no single thing: its boundaries are drawn and redrawn inflexible, historically changing and sometimes ambiguous ways.

3,402 citations


Cites background from "One dimensional man"

  • ...Still others define science as an ideology itself (Marcuse, 1964); for Habermas (1970:115) the form of scientific knowledge embodies its own values of prediction and control, and thus may substitute for "the demolished bourgeois ideology" in legitimating structures of domination and repression....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the corporate social reporting literature, its major theoretical preoccupations and empirical conclusions, attempts to re-examine the theoretical tensions that exist between “classical” political economy interpretations of social disclosure and those from more “bourgeois” perspectives.
Abstract: Takes as its departure point the criticism of Guthrie and Parker by Arnold and the Tinker et al. critique of Gray et al. Following an extensive review of the corporate social reporting literature, its major theoretical preoccupations and empirical conclusions, attempts to re‐examine the theoretical tensions that exist between “classical” political economy interpretations of social disclosure and those from more “bourgeois” perspectives. Argues that political economy, legitimacy theory and stakeholder theory need not be competitor theories but may, if analysed appropriately, be seen as alternative and mutually enriching theories from alternative levels of resolution. Offers evidence from 13 years of social disclosure by UK companies and attempts to interpret this from different levels of resolution. There is little doubt that social disclosure practice has changed dramatically in the period. The theoretical perspectives prove to offer different, but mutually enhancing, interpretations of these phenomena.

2,923 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined accounts of travelers in terms of Erving Goffman's front versus back distinction and found that tourists try to enter back regions of the places they visit because these regions are associated with intimacy of relations and authenticity of experiences.
Abstract: The problem of false consciousness and its relationship to the social structure of tourist establishments is analyzed. Accounts of travelers are examined in terms of Erving Goffman's front versus back distinction. It is found that tourists try to enter back regions of the places they visit because these regions are associated with intimacy of relations and authenticity of experiences. It is also found that tourist settings are arrenged to produce the impression that a back region has been entered even when this is not the case. In tourist settings, between the front and the back there is a series of special spaces designed to accommodate tourists and to support their beliefs in the authenticity of their experiences. Goffman's front-back dichotomy is shown to be ideal poles of a continuum, or a variable.

2,627 citations


Cites background from "One dimensional man"

  • ...David Riesman's "other directed" (1950) and Herbert Marcuse's "one-dimensional" men (1964) are products of a traditional intellectual concern for the superficiality of knowledge in mass industrial society, but the tourist setting per se is just beginning to prompt intellectual commentary....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors trace the rise of the modern cultural engineering paradigm of branding, premised upon a consumer culture that granted marketers cultural authority, and describe the current post-postmodern consumer culture, which is premised on the pursuit of personal sovereignty through brands.
Abstract: Brands are today under attack by an emerging countercultural movement. This study builds a dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding that explains the rise of this movement and its potential effects. Results of an interpretive study challenge existing theories of consumer resistance. To develop an alternative model, I first trace the rise of the modern cultural engineering paradigm of branding, premised upon a consumer culture that granted marketers cultural authority. Intrinsic contradictions erased its efficacy. Next I describe the current postmodern consumer culture, which is premised upon the pursuit of personal sovereignty through brands. I detail five postmodern branding techniques that are premised upon the principle that brands are authentic cultural resources. Postmodern branding is now giving rise to new contradictions that have inflamed the antibranding sentiment sweeping Western countries. I detail these contradictions and project that they will give rise to a new post-postmodern branding paradigm premised upon brands as citizen-artists.

1,797 citations

Book
Jon Elster1
29 Jul 1983
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a list of states that are essentially by-products of rationality, bias, and ideology, including sour grapes, as well as byproducts of belief, bias and ideology.
Abstract: Preface and acknowledgements 1. Rationality 2. States that are essentially by-products 3. Sour grapes 4. Belief, bias and ideology References Index.

1,221 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper examined the American Dream through categories of mobility, marginalization, and hope, and examined the ability to reframe the American dream through select speeches at the 2008 Democratic National Convention.
Abstract: The American Dream functions as a myth within our political discourse by providing hope to citizens and reinforcing beliefs in the protestant work ethic and meritocracy. This article examines the myth through categories of mobility, marginalization, and hope. Elite theory and institutional isomorphism are used to explore business privilege within Public Administration. The ability to reframe the American Dream is considered through an examination of select speeches at the 2008 Democratic National Convention. Despite evidence of declining mobility and structural inequality, citizens cling to the myth. One explanation is that marginalization perpetuates the American Dream by crowding out issues of social class through various methods of institutional isomorphism. Another explanation is that the dream endures because it can be re-conceptualized.

21 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss why philosophers and engineers are now meeting together at international workshops and answer from an engineering perspective using an analogy to Kuhn, suggesting that engineers are seeking conceptual clarification using philosophy in the technological crisis of a creative era.
Abstract: This chapter asks why philosophers and engineers are now meeting together at international workshops and answers from an engineering perspective using an analogy to Kuhn. Specifically, the chapter suggests that engineers are now seeking conceptual clarification using philosophy in the technological crisis of a creative era in the same way that scientists sought conceptual clarification using philosophy in the scientific crisis that came in the wake of the discovery of relativity and quantum mechanics. The chapter starts by enumerating a number of ways in which philosophers and engineers are strange bedfellows. It continues with a cursory sociotechnical review of recent times. It carries on by making the connection to Kuhn, and it concludes with three specific ways in which philosophy can help engineers achieve greater methodological, pedagogical, and epistemological clarity. Although the chapter wonders whether newly philosophical engineers will persist in their reflections, it suggests that, regardless, the encounter should be productive for engineering and philosophy, both.

21 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: A case study of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI) can be found in this paper where the authors explore the sorely overlooked role of science within the civil society.
Abstract: This article explores the sorely overlooked role of science within the civil society scheme, subscribing a scientific sphere of influence according to the minimalist civil society model It first introduces the relevance of this sphere to the civil society project as a whole, and then provides a case study of one organization of scientists, the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), situated on the border of the science and civil spheres The study reviews SPSSI’s successes in advancing values today associated with civil society, and then examines more closely the challenges that have been posed to such activities by the state, market, science, and civil realms alike These challenges, it is argued, are a threat to all organizations seeking to advance the values of civil society, and such organizations would do well to prepare for the probable interference by each of these spheres as SPSSI did not In addition, those aspects of SPSSI’s history unique to social scientific endeavors can illuminate challenges which civil society researchers share as social scientists with a particular social vision SPSSI’s perpetual negotiation of two sets of tensions – that between elitism and democratic values; and that between scientific neutralist and social engagement – reveal the paradoxes inherent in any social scientific movement Finally, it is concluded that studies of “borderland” organizations like SPSSI may provide a fruitful point of departure for further studies of science and civil society Der Beitrag untersucht die stark vernachlassigte Rolle der Wissenschaften im ‚Projekt Zivilgesellschaft’ und skizziert die wissenschaftliche Einflusssphare vor dem Hintergrund eines minimalistischen Zivilgesellschaftsmodells Die Bedeutung dieser Sphare fur das ‚Projekt Zivilgesellschaft’ insgesamt wird zunachst umrissen und sodann beispielhaft anhand einer Fallstudie uber die „Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI)“, einer wissenschaftlichen Organisation an der Grenze zwischen Wissenschaft und der Sphare burgerschaftlichen Engagements, vertieft Die Studie gibt einen Uberblick uber die Erfolge, die SPSSI bei der Verbreitung von Werten hatte, die heute mit ‚Zivilgesellschaft’ verbunden werden, und untersucht dann naher die Herausforderungen, denen diese Aktivitaten von seiten des Staates, des Marktes, der Wissenschaft und der Bereiche zivilgesellschaftlichen Engagements gleichermasen ausgesetzt waren Diese Herausforderungen, so wird argumentiert, stellen eine Bedrohung fur alle Organisationen dar, die versuchen, zivilgesellschaftliche Werte voranzubringen, so dass diese, anders als SPSSI, gut daran taten, sich auf mogliche Storungen aus jeder dieser Spharen vorzubereiten Diese Aspekte der fur sozialwissenschaftliche Bestrebungen einzigartigen Geschichte von SPSSI konnen daruber hinaus die Herausforderungen erhellen, denen sich Forscher der Zivilgesellschaft als Sozialwissenschaftler mit einer besonderen sozialen Vision gegenuber sehen Der standige Balanceakt von SPSSI zwischen zwei Spannungsverhaltnissen – zum einen zwischen Elitismus und demokratischen Werten, zum anderen zwischen wissenschaftlichem Neutralismus und sozialem Engagement – enthullt die Widerspruche, die jeder sozialwissenschaftlichen Bewegung innewohnen Daher konnen Studien uber Organisationen „im Grenzgebiet“ wie SPSSI, so die Schlussfolgerung, einen fruchtbaren Ausgangspunkt fur weitere Forschungen uber das Verhaltnis von Wissenschaft und Zivilgesellschaft bieten

21 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: French Marxist sociologist, Henri Lefebvre, was one of the foremost social theorists of the twentieth century, celebrated for his critiques of everyday life, urban revolution, and the production of...
Abstract: French Marxist sociologist, Henri Lefebvre, was one of the foremost social theorists of the twentieth century, celebrated for his critiques of everyday life, urban revolution, and the production of...

21 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an internal criticism of Winch's seminal "Understanding a Primitive Society" is presented, which distinguishes between two contrasting approaches to critical social understanding: (1) the metaphysical approach, central to the whole tradition of critical philosophy and critical social theory from Kant, through Marx to the Frankfurt School and contemporary theorists such as Habermas and Searle; (2) the descriptive approach, advocated by Winch, and which derives from Wittgenstein's critique of philosophical theory.
Abstract: This paper presents an 'internal' criticism of Winch's seminal 'Understanding a Primitive Society'. It distinguishes between two contrasting approaches to critical social understanding: (1) the metaphysicalapproach, central to the whole tradition of critical philosophy and critical social theory from Kant, through Marx to the Frankfurt School and contemporary theorists such as Habermas and Searle; (2) the descriptiveapproach, advocated by Winch, and which derives from Wittgenstein's critique of philosophical theory. It is argued, against a long tradition of 'critical theory' depicting Wittgenstein's philosophy as irredeemably 'conservative', that the descriptive approach is perfectly apt for generating a critical understanding of central Western institutions. Rather than seeking to provide an explanatory theory through which to discern what allegedly is imperceptible to theoretically unaided perception (i.e. the metaphysical approach), the descriptive approach aims for a 'perspicuous presentation' of our ...

20 citations